Für Vielleser mit Magen– bisddu deppat! PAEDONEKROPHILIE.. und die finden sich selbst ok!! WAS HABEN DIE IN IHREN VERWITTERUNGSBIRNEN?
17.07.2026
Sind ja selbst miß´braucht?
Gott, irgendwo müßma anfangen die VERZAUVERUNG, die offenbar alle hienichen egal welcher Leibbaurt erleben, wenn sie in Menschenleibern herumfummeln, aufzubre3chen! BIS DAHIN HABEN WIR KEINE LEBEN!!! Niemad von uns, auch nicht die Schwipppbogerlhirntussis und ihre Draufpickseln…
Tja…
Arbeit ist nur gtan, wenn man sie anpackt und durchführt.
KOMISCH UNGEISTIGES Prinzip?
Tja… GERADE DAS Feinstoffliche ist hartes Wesengesamtraumhandwerk, weil da ja alle Deppen dauerhereinlappen.
NPÜCHTERNHEIT, Ärmel aufkrempeln und los!
ES IST EGAL, wo man anfängt, es ist hier der Kosmos Der Fehldenkwesenmorast!
ALLEN ECHTEN FRAUEN UND MÄNNERN, die als solche sich aufführen, WENN NIEMAND SIE SIEHT EBENFALLS … URDANKE! Ihr seid, was immerhin die Erde trösten mag, und uns allen Mut gibt, daß auch wir es dahin schaffen, egal wo es uns in diese Hirnrißkloake da hereingeschossen hat, und wir uns umzuschauen und anzufangen haben all diesen DRECK, der niemals Erde war… hier ist die hohe Schle meisterlcher Wirwilligkeit jedes Einzelnen – aus uns hinauszuputzen, was allen Parasiten, die auf einmal auf ihre eigenen Stummelbeinchen angewiesen sind.. RAUMPRO-B _Lähme macht.. und langsam zerlegt sich dieses Tobklumpert, daß das DENKFÜHLEN NICHT und nicht lernen hat wollen, als eigenraumtragungen, und sich lieber zu Suchtkarkassenabbruchbirnen in alles Leben verdichten hat wollen. Tja…. bei Mißständen hilft nur diese angehen. Gutes Werkzeug? DU!!! Dein Wesengesamtraum, darin deine erdenmenschliche Willigkeit und Sanftheit und Kraft…. und du in dir Werkstatt, WErkzeuge und Werkmeister auch. UND MAN KANN GENAU ALS DAS FREUNDE FINDEN, Kollegen! Toll, gell?
Wann fang’ma an?
HIER… Madonna… paedo-nekro-BRUNZKOLBENSUCHTTOBENd.. ekelig.
Arm auch?
JA… aber so kann man das nicht sich teilmachen immer weiter noch lassen machen. DEREN EIGENE KINDER sind ja vor denen zu retten!
WIE WIR AUCH, wir hingehaltenen all diesen Deckdenkkarkassen-Bringkinder?
JA! Ich SAGTE DOCH, es ist wurscht, woma anfangt!
Wer unseren Politpupperln endlich einmal auf die Finger klopft, sie haben nicht nur die Verschleierwanzerln zu tanzspielen.. GENAUSO GUT! WER ein Kind zeugt und mit seinem Partner liebevoll erzieht! PHANTASTISCH!
wer mir einen guten Apfelstrudel verkauft, urdank ganz genauso!!
<<<.
Na gut: für ECHTE Seitenschlinger: bitte hier:
i
c u z a m
Supreme Court, U.S.
FILED
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
No.
?o-M
•Bn W&t
Supreme Court pt tfie 3Hmteb States?
CHERYL D. UZAMERE AS SOLE PROPRIETOR OF
UZAMERE WORD PROCESSING & MORE
Petitioner,
v.
THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
Respondents.
On Petition For A Writ of Certiorari
To The United States Court of Appeals
For the Second Circuit
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Appearing Pro Se
Uzamere Word Processing
& More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
cheryl .uzamere @uzamere
w_Qrdpr_QC.essing.net RECEIVED
AUG 1 3 2020
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
SUPREME COURT, II RQUESTIONS PRESENTED
The questions presented are:
1.
unconstitutional:
Whether New York State Law S2942—A is
a) Federal Courts find that New York State Law
S2942—A is unconstitutional.
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates the
Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs Act.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on Its
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et
al.
2.
Whether the circuit court’s and district court’s
decisions are in contravention of the Second Circuit’s
mandate concerning court corruption that was established in
Chevron v. Donziger.
3.
Whether the petitioner has the First
Amendment right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
viewpoint regarding the Babylonian Talmud’s espousal of
the worship of the god Molech, the god of pedophilia.
i
ui e z n oc u z a m
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner
Cheryl D. Uzamere, Individually and as Sole Proprietor
of Uzamere Word Processing & More
Respondents
New York State The Honorable
Pamela L. Fisher
The Honorable
Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor
New York State
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Letitia James
Attorney General
New York State
The Honorable
Janet Difiore
Chief Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Robin S. Garson
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Bernard J. Graham
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
nThe Honorable
Lawrence K. Marks
Chief Administrative Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lara J. Genovesi
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lawrence Knipel
Administrative Judge
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Dawn Jimenez-Salta
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
The Honorable
Jeffrey Sunshine Matrimonial Kathy J. King
Practice Advisory and Rules Justice of the
Committee, Statewide
Kings County
Coordinating Judge for
Supreme Court
Matrimonial Cases
New York State
New York State
Unified Court System
Unified Court System
Susan Kaufman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Donald Kurtz
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
m
ui e z n oThe Honorable
Betty Weinberg Ellerin
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Sondra Miller
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jacqueline Silbermann
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Alton Abramowitz, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
IV
c u 2 a m
The Honorable
Carl Landicino
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Katherine A. Levine
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Richard J. Montelione
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lisa S. Ottley
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemSusan L. Bender, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Roseann Branda, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Andrew Crecca
Justice of the Supreme Court,
Suffolk County Supervising
Judge of Matrimonial Matters
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Kathleen Donelli, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
v
uezn:
The Honorable
Mark Partnow
Justice of the
Kings County .
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michael Pesce
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Eric Prus
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Karen B. Rothenberg
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court Systemc u z a m
The Honorable
The Honorable
Laura A. Drager
Leon Ruchelsman
Acting Justice of the Supreme Justice of the
Court New York County,
Kings County Supreme
Matrimonial Practice
Court
Advisory and Rules
New York State
Committee
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
Donna England, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Stephen J. Gassman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen Gesmer
Associate Justice
Appellate Division for the
First Department
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wayne P. Saitta
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Kenneth Sherman
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Debra Silber
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
viThe Honorable
Cheryl A. Joseph
Acting Supreme Court Justice
Supreme Court, Suffolk
County, Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Elena Karabatos, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jeffrey D. Lebowitz
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Christopher S. Mattingly Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Vll
meznj
The Honorable
Martin Solomon
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen M. Spodek
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court for The New
York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable Marsha
L. Steinhardt Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Peter P. Sweeney
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemMichael A. Mosberg Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Hemalee J. Patel, Esq.,
Referee of the Supreme Court
Richmond County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Florence Richardson Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Yesenia Rivera, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
vm
c u z a m
The Honorable Delores
J. Thomas Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wavny Toussaint
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
David B. Vaughan
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Richard
Velasquez Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemThe Honorable
Emily Ruben
Family Court Judge
Queens County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Sharon Kelly Sayers, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Carolyn
E. Wade Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Zenith T. Taylor, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Eric A. Tepper, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Edgar G. Walker
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michelle Weston
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Paul Wooten
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
IX
uezn:c u 2 a m
Bruce J. Wagner, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Michael McSweeney
New York City Clerk
of the Council
Harriet Weinberger, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Patrick L. Synmoie
Executive Agency
Counsel
New York City
Clerk’s Office
The Honorable
Howard A. Zucker
Hope Zimmerman Justice of M.D., J.D.,
the Supreme Court, Nassau Commissioner
County Matrimonial Practice New York State
Advisory and Rules
Department of Health
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Rachel A. Adams
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Richard Zahnleuter
General Counsel
New York State
Department of Health
xThe Honorable
Sylvia G. Ash
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Loren Baily-Schiffman
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Johnny Lee Baynes
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Reginald A. Boddie
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Andrew M. Saul
Commissioner
Social Security
Administration
Royce B. Min
General Counsel
Social Security
Administration
Monica Chyn
Social Security
Admini stration
Gail Ennis ■
Inspector General
Social Security
Administration
xi
uisznsThe Honorable
Theresa Ciccotto
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Lissette Colon
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Matthew
D’Emic Justice of the
Kings County Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Jeanine Edwards
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Xll
cuzam
Ellen Sovern
Regional General
Counsel, Regional II
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe7“Jane Doe,
Office Manager, Social
Security District Office
3386 Crescent Street,
Brooklyn, New York,
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe”/“Jane Doe,
Office Manager
Social Security
District Office
Social Security
Administration
“Jane Doe”
, a.k.a. “Ms.
Flores, Pass Cadre
Worker, Supervisor,
Social Security District
Office
Social Security
Administrationc u z a m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS xiv
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES xxi
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1
OPINIONS BELOW 1
JURISDICTION 1
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
PROVISIONS……………………………………… 1
INTRODUCTION 5
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 15
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION 27
I. New York State Law
Unconstitutional:……………..
S2942—A is
27
a) Federal Courts find that New York State
Law S2942—A is unconstitutional…………. 27
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates
the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs
Act 28
xivi
c) New York State Abrogated the
Fourteenth Amendment Regarding Age
and Race Based on Its Enforcement of the
Israel Anti-Boycott Law……………………….. 28
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of
Genocide against Palestinians and New
York State’s Acts of Genocide against Black
People are under federal scrutiny in the
case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin
Netanyahu, etal.……………………………………. 30
II.
The Circuit Courts and District Court’s
Decision are in Contravention of the Second
Circuit’s Mandate concerning Court
Corruption that was established in Chevron
v. Donziger.…………………………………………..……
32
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment
Right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
Viewpoint……………………………………………………
35
CONCLUSION
39
APPENDIX A
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3825-cv dated April 10, 2020 3
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3402-cv dated October 24, 2019 4
U.S. District Court Bar Order
19-cv-9064…………………………… 5-7
U.S. District Court Dismissal
19-cv-9064………………………….. 8-12
xv
ui u z n oi
c u 2 a m
APPENDIX B
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 108b,
footnote 34……………………………………………………………. 5
Artsot Ha-Hayyim, pages 52a/52b 8
Midrash Rabbah, Vol. 1, page 293 11
Legends of the Jews, Vol. page 169
The Curse of Drunkenness………… 13
Come and Hear, Sex with Children
by Talmud Rules………………………… 15
History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties in a
Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra-Orthodox Males
with Pedophilia……………………………………………….. 40
News Punch — News Punch — Netanyahu To Release
Evidence of a Pedophile in Washington DC…………… 48
Veterans Today, Larry King, Overachiever 54
Haaretz, A Nation of Pedophiles 66
Haaretz, Defying a Conspiracy of Silence about
Pedophilia…………………………..………………………. 68
Haaretz, Israel Become a Refuge for Pedophiles
Warns Advocate for Child Sex Abuse…………….. 69
Haaretz, Israel Admits Ethiopian Women Were
Given Birth Control Shots…………………………….. 70
The Truth about Prostitution in Israel 71
xviThe Haredim (Orthodox Jews) Who Crowd Tel Aviv
Brothels……………………………………………………………… 72
Tikum Olam: The Ringworm Scandal: When Israeli
Doctors Killed Tens of Thousands of Arab Jewish
Children…………………………………………………………….. 77
Tikun Olam: Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies
Murdered in Medical Experiments, Abducted from
Parents, and Exploited in Paid National Institutes of
Health Experiments……………………………………..…………. 81
Telesur: 59,000 Palestinian Children Physically
Abused by Israel…………………………………………… 86
Monoweiss: Baltimore is Here; Ethiopian Jews
Protest Police Brutality in Jerusalem………….. 87
Anadolu Agency: Ethiopian Jews Suffer Racism in
Israel………………………………………………………………… 90
Personal Representative to the Dawabsheh Family v.
Benjamin Netanyahu……………………………………………. 91
The Ten Stages of Genocide 271
APPENDIX C
David P. Walker’s Facebook Statement 6
Tara A. Uzamere’s Affidavit and Exhibits 7
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Affidavit 11-12
xvn
iu e z n oI
\
c u z a m
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Certificate/License…………………….. 13
New York State Department of Health Father-
Identity-Lacking Birth Certificate………………… 14
1-130 Falsified Immigration Form 15
1-214 Complaint Form to Immigration and
Naturalization Service…………………………... 16-19
Attorney Osato Eugene Uzamere Falsified
Affirmation…………………………………………….. 20-21
Ehigie Uzamere Falsified Affidavit
(Posing as “Godwin E. Uzamere”)… 22-27
Respondent Honorable Justice Jeffrey Sunshine
Interlocutory Decision, page 9…………………………. 28
Respondent Honorable Jeffrey Sunshine
Decision Regarding Identity of Petitioner’s
Husband Ehigie Uzamere……………………….. 29-30
FOIA Response from U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services Regarding Identity of
Ehigie Uzamere with Exhibits…………………. 31-33
General Docket Sheet for Docket No. 19-3402
as of Julyl2, 2020……………………………………… 34-38
Order of Dismissal/Show Cause with
Superimposed Date October 17, 2010
38-43
Petitioner’s Notice on Record of Appeal dated
October 17, 2019…………..……………………………. 44-48
XVlllPetitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Declaration of Motion to Withdraw Court’s
Fraudulent Sua Sponte Notice of Interlocutory
Appeal Docket No. 19-3402 dated
October 22, 2019……………………………………………. 49-185
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York, Case No. 19-3402……………………..
186
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York with Mandate for Case No. 19-3402 187
General Docket Sheet for Docket 19-3825 188-196
Docket Notice and Notice of Appeal for
Docket 19-3825 (pages 1-5) Dated
November 13, 2019…………………………… 197-201
Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
and Certificate of Services dated
December 16, 2019…………………………….. 202-203
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Affidavit/Declaration in Support of Motion
Dated December 16, 2019……………………………… 204-205
Petitioner’s Brief, Page 1 dated
December 16, 2019………………… 206
Letter from Benjamin Torrance dated
January 6, 2020……………………………… 207-208
Letter from Oren L. Zeve dated
January 6, 2020…………………….
209-211
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief dated
January 15, 2020……………………………………… 212
xix
I
1
ui e z n a
!\
c u z
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix A
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 213
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix B
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 214
Petitioner’s Combined Amended Response
And Reply and Motion in Support dated
January 15, 2020…………………………………… 215
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
dated January 21, 2020…………………………………… 216
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix A dated January 21, 2020………………… 217
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix B dated January 21, 2020………………… 218
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix C dated January 21, 2020………………… 219
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix D dated January 21, 2020……………….. 220
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement
and Combined Amended Affidavit in Support
dated January 31, 2020……………………………… 221
xxTABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District 27
Bryan v. Moore
7, 35
Bulloch v. United States,
763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985) 21, 32
Chevron v. Donziger 1, 21, 32, 33, 34
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive
Health, et al., 462 U.S. 416, 103 S. Ct. 2481; 76 L.
Ed. 2d 687……………………………………………………….. 1, 21, 32,
Federal Communications Commission, v. Fox
Television Stations, 10-1293, 567 U.S. 239, 132 S.
Ct. 2307; 183 L. Ed. 2d 234; 2012 WL 2344462;
2012 U.S. LEXIS 4661;…………………………………….. 21
Johnson v. United States, 13-7120, 576 U.S. 591,
135 S. Ct. 2551; 192 L. Ed. 2d 569;………………..…. 21
Jordahl v. Brnovich 21
Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968) 21,32
Kolender, et al. v. Edward Lawson , 461 U.S. 352,
103 S. Ct. 1855; 75 L. Ed. 2d 903………………………. 21
Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1007 (2018) 21
Margaret Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville,
70-5030, 405 U.S. 156, 92 S. Ct. 839; 31 L. Ed. 2d
110; 1972…………………………………………………………….. 21
xxi
ui e z n o
i
ic u z a m
Personal Representative of the Dawabsheh
Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
etal.……………………………………………………….i, 15, 17, 22, 30
Sessions v. Dimaya\ 15-1498, 584 U.S., 138 S. Ct.
1204; 200 1. L. Ed. 2d 549; 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2497 22
Uzamere v. Allen E. Kaye, P.C., l:09-CV-3506,
S.D.N.Y. April 2, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 09-
1600-cv (2d Cir. June 24, 2009), cert, denied, 558
U.S. 965 (Oct. 13, 2009)…..………………………………. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Cuomo, No. ll-CV-2831 (E.D.N.Y. June
22, 2011), appeal dismissed, No. 11-2713-cv (2d Cir.
Nov. 28, 2011), cert denied, 565 U.S. 1264 (Mar. 19,
2012)………………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Rice, No. 08-CV-0891 (NGG)
(E.D.N.Y. July 6, 2007)……………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. United States, No. 13-505S, 2013 WL
5781216 (D.R.I. Oct. 25, 2013), affd, No.13-2454 (1st
Cir. Apr. 11, 2014), cert, denied, 135 S. Ct. 451 (Nov.
3, 2014)……………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Village of Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside,
Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 102 S. Ct.
1186; 71 L. Ed. 2d………………………………………………. 22
Constitutional Provisions
U.S. Const. Article VI, Section 2
Supremacy Clause…………………. 2, 7, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. I .1,2, 5, 7, 15,
22, 23, 27, 25
XXIIU.S. Const. Amend. V (Due Process) 2, 3, 14, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. XIII 2
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV (Due Process) 1, 3,
12, 14, 15, 28, 32
i
Statutes, Regulations, and Rules
18 U.S.C. § 873, blackmail, RICO 26
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 26, 33
18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B), domestic terrorism 23
18 U.S.C. § 1503, obstruction of justice 23
18 U.S.C. § 872, extortion 23
18 U.S.C. § 1951, Hobbs Act extortion 5, 23
28 U.S.C. § 1254(1) 1
Americans with Disabilities Act 15
Civil Rights Act of 1964 23
New York State Domestic Relations Law § 236 23
New York State Executive Law No. 157
16, 23
New York State Sessions Law S2942—A
(The Act) 1, 14, 16 23, 27, 28
Texas House Bill 89
27
Violence Against Women Act 22
XXlll
iu e z n oc u z a m
7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, J 60.23 32
Other Authorities
Babylonian Talmud
Tractate Abodah Zarah, Folio 26b
(Law of Moser)………………………….. 11, 15
Tractate Kethuboth, Folio lib 10
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 64a 36
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 745, 108b 7, 24, 16
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 57a 9
Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a 9, 35
Com eandHear
New America, America’s New Government
Church……………………………………………………. 6, 9
Death Penalty and Talmud Law,
Sentence and Execution…………. 6
What About Gentiles
Co-existence:…………. 24
Informing on Fellow Jews Who Commit
Crimes………………………………………………. 11
Sex with Children by Talmud Rules 11
XXIVThe Benediction against the Minim
Lawrence Schiffman……………………. 9, 11
Guide to the Perplexed
Rabbi Moses Maimonides 7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, page 293 Birkat HaMinim
8, 16, 25
8, 16, 25
8
Holy Bible
Genesis 19:1-23
38
Leviticus 20:1
Leviticus 20:1-5
25, 36
25
Leviticus 20:14
25
Numbers 25 38
Judges 19-21
Amos 5:23
39
37
Acts 7:42-43
37
xxv
ui e z n ac u z a m
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere, sole proprietor of Uzamere
Word Processing & More petitions this Court for a writ of
certiorari to review the judgment of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in this matter.
♦
OPINIONS BELOW
The decisions of the court of appeals is printed in
Appendix A (App. A) at 3a-4a. The district court’s opinions
are printed at App. A 5a-12a.
JURISDICTION
The court of appeals entered its judgment on April
10, 2020; this petition is therefore timely filed. This Court
has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1).
CONSTITUTIONAL AND
STATUTORY PROVISIONS
Article I, Section 8, the Commerce Clause of the United
States Constitution provides:
1. To regulate commerce with foreign nations,
and among the several states, and with the
Indian tribes;
2. To constitute tribunals inferior to the
Supreme Court;
1Article VI, Section 2, the Supremacy Clause of the
United States Constitution provides:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United
States…shall be the supreme Law of the
Land…
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law;
The Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
The Judicial power of the United States shall
not be construed to extend to any suit in law or
equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of
the United States by Citizens of another State,
or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,
except as a punishment for crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
2
ui e z n o
ic u 2 a m
within the United States, or any place subject
to their jurisdiction.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution provides:
Section 1: nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.
Statutory Provisions
Civil Law
42JJ.S.C. §19_8_1,.Equal Rights Under the Law:
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United
States shall have the same right in every State
and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to
sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full
and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings
for the security of persons and property as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject
to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes,
licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no
other.
42JLI.S.C.§1983,CivilActionfor_DeprivatiQn_of
Rights
Every person who, under color of any statute,
ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any
State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen
of the United States or other person within the
jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any
3rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the
party injured in an action at law, suit in equity,
or other proper proceeding for redress, except
that in any action brought against a judicial
officer for an act or omission taken in such
officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall
not be granted unless a declaratory decree was
violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
Criminal Law
15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Law:
Every contract, combination in the form of trust
or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade
or commerce among the several states or with
foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every
person who shall make any contract or engage
in any combination or conspiracy hereby
declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of
a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be
punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if
a corporation, or, if any other person
$1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding
10 years, or by both said punishments, in the
discretion of the court.
18 U.S.C. § 1962, Racketeering-Influenced
C or rupt_organiz ation:
It shall be unlawful for any person through a
pattern of racketeering activity or through
collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or
maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in
or control of any enterprise which is engaged in,
or the activities of which affect, interstate or
foreign commerce.
4
ui e 2 n dl
\
\
cuzam
18U.S.C.§1951,Interferencejvith„Commerce
by ThreatsorViolenee
Whoever in any way or degree obstructs,
delays, or affects commerce or the movement of
any article or commodity in commerce, by
robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires to
do so, or commits or threatens physical violence
to any person or property in furtherance of a
plan or purpose to do anything in violation of
this section shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than twenty years, or
both.
18 U.S.C. § 3771, 18 U.S.C. § 10607(c), Crime
Victims’ Rights: A crime victim has the
following rights:
The right to be treated with fairness and with
respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.
¥
INTRODUCTION
“…Let me say first that a constitution, as
important as it is, will mean nothing unless the
people are yearning for liberty and freedom. If
the people don’t care, then the best constitution
in the world won’t make any difference. So, the
spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and
then the constitution
first, it should
safeguard basic fundamental human rights,
like our First Amendment, the right to speak
5freely, and to publish freely, without the
government as a censor.1,2
You should certainly be aided by all the
constitution-writing that has gone one since the
end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S.
constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in
the year 2012.”
Excerpt from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg interview with A1 Hayat TV in Egypt3
On November 5, 2002, nearly ten (10) years prior to
the publicized statement eschewing the U.S. Constitution
as a model for other countries to emulate, the National
Institute for Judaic Law celebrated its founding in the
building housing the U.S. Supreme Court. The gala …was
attended by 200 dinner guests, including justices from this
honorable Court.
Information regarding the gala was publicized by
Come and Hear, at the website entitled New America,
America’
s New Government Church.4
At the Come and Hear website, a chapter entitled
Death Penalty and Talmud Law, Sentence and Execution5
5, says:
I
I1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg;
2 https://www.memri.org/tv/us-supreme-court-justice-ruth-
baderginsburgegyptians-look-constitutions-south-africa-or-canada
3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg&t=3s
4 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html.
5 http://www.come-and-hear.eom/editor/capunish_l.html#n7
1
6
w p z n o1
c u z a in
SupremeCourtConsidersTalmudic Law
“In December 1999, the United States
Supreme Court set a precedent by accepting
for consideration an amicus [curiae] brief in a
death penalty case (Bryan v. Moore)…the brief
was based wholly on Talmud law.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
prohibits the favoring and/or establishment of any religion
in governmental settings. Governmental reliance on
religion, no matter how well-intentioned, is disingenuous
on its face because it violates the Supremacy Clause of the
U.S. Constitution.
The public is unaware of Babylonian Talmudic
dogma that is discriminatory and deadly to people of
African descent, Gentiles, children and especially
whistleblowers:
HatredofPeopleofAfricanDescent6
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio p. 745, 108b: „Our Rabbis taught: …
Ham was smitten in his skin.“ (This is
footnoted, and the footnote reads: „I.e., from
him was descended Cush (the negro), who is
black-skinned.“
Rabbi Moses Maimonides (RamBam), Guide
to the Perplexed: “[T]he Kushites (Negroes)
found in the remote South… rank lower than
the rank of man but higher than the rank of
apes. For they have the external shape and
lineaments of a man and a faculty of
http://_wjv_w_.ottmalLcom/mj_ht_arch/v_15/mj_vl5i20.html#jCDX
7discernment that is superior to that of the
apes.7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim: “the reason Abraham
Lincoln was killed was because he freed the
blacks, this is also the reason why Kennedy
was killed, i.e. because he was good to the
blacks. He continues by saying that this will
be the fate of any who adopt a progressive
attitude towards blacks, because they are
meant to be enslaved.
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
„AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN
(Breishit 9:25): (Commentary omitted) …R.
Huna also said in R. Joseph’s name: You [i.e.
Noah is speaking to Ham) have prevented me
from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed
will be ugly and dark-skinned. R. Chiyya said:
Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark
therefore, Ham came forth black-skinned
while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.“
Hatred of Christians
Birkat HaMinin (Curse against Christians):
…Let the nozerim and the minim be destroyed
in a moment. And let them be blotted out of
the Book of Life and not be inscribed together
with the righteous. Blessed art thou, O Lord,
who humblest the arrogant.“
7 https://www.sefaria.org/Guide_for_the_Perplexed%2C_Part_3.5171an
g=bi
8
ui e z n oc u z a m
Professor Lawrence H. Schiffman: …These
passages present evidence that some version
of the benediction was already recited in the
mid-second century C.E. and that it included
explicit reference to the Christians.8
ComeandHear, New_Ameriea,_America’s_N_ew
GovernmentChurch9
The Noahide Laws promise deadly
consequences for Christians… LORD God
tasked the Jews to enforce the seven Noahide
Commandments, and to enforce them with
liberal use of the death penalty.
EspQusaloftheSlaughterofGentiles
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio 57a: ‚For murder, whether of a Cuthean
by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean,
punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by
an Israelite, there is no death penalty‘?10
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama,
Folio 113a: ‚Where a suit arises between an
Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the
former according to the laws of Israel, justify
him and say: ‚This is our law‘; so also if you
can justify him by the laws of the heathens
justify him and say [to the other party:] ‚This
is your law‘; but if this cannot be done, we use
subterfuges to circumvent him.11
8 http://lawrenceschiffman.com/the-benediction-against-the-minim/
9 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html
10 https://halakhah.com/sanhedrin/_sanhedrin_5_7_.html
11 https://halakhah.com/babakamma/babakamma
113.html
_
9Death Penalty and the Babylonian Talmud12
…Talmud law insists on unequal justice
under law. Talmudic law holds there is one
law for Jews, and one for Gentiles. This is not
inconsistent
with the Old
Testament…Gentiles are the proper slaves of
Jews.
Co-existence?13
What does the future hold? Can the Jews ever
co-exist with the rest of humanity? The
answer is „yes,“ provided the rest of humanity
accepts the role designed for them by Jewish
leadership. If Gentiles do not accept
enslavement, there will be conflict.
The Worship of Molech and Pedophilia
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth,
Folio lib: GEMARA: … When a grown-up
man has intercourse with a little girl it is
nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it
is as if one puts the finger into the eye…»14
12 http://w_w_w_.come-and-hear.com/editor/cap.unish_4.html
13 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/gentile.html
14 https ://halakhah.com/kethuboth/kethuboth_l 1 .html
10
ui e z n dc u z a m
Come and Hear, Sex with Children by Talmud
Rules:15 Again, there is no prohibition of a
sexual practice that would almost certainly
cause physical damage to a young girl due to
the mismatched sizes of genitals between an
adult’s penis and a child’s vagina or anus.
In the Talmud, grown men are permitted to
have sexual intercourse with female babies and
children, and homosexual relations with boys
younger than nine.
Sentence
of Death
for
Christian/Minim,
__
__
__
Apostates and Whistleblowers/Mosrim16
R. Abbahu recited to R. Johanan: ‚Idolaters and
[Jewish] shepherds of small cattle need not be
brought up though they must not be cast in, but
minim, informers, and apostates may be cast
in, and need not be brought up.
Michael J. Broyde, Esq., Co-Directors of National
Institute for Judaic Law’s Inaugural Project17 expounded on
Zarah 26b’s
Abodah prohibition against
whistleblowing/meshira in his speech entitled “Informing on
Fellow Jews Who Commit Crimes18:
… the Talmud recounts – in a number of places
– that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the
secular government, even when their conduct is
a violation of secular law and even when their
conduct is a violation of Jewish law.
15 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
16 The Curse against Christians,
http://lawrenceschifrman.com/thebenediction-againstrthe-minim
17http://nijLorg/contactJitml
18 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/moser-broyde/index.html
11As of the writing of this petition, the petitioner’s
children are victims of sexual violence by respondent New
York State’s foster care system. They have never been
heard, and the petitioner’s attempts to seek justice on
behalf of her children has been successfully rebuffed by
members of the Ashkenazi community’s legal and judicial
community for several decades. The groom-identity-
lacking marriage affidavit containing the fictitious name
“Godwin E. Uzamere” that the petitioner’s husband and his
attorneys submitted to respondent New York State’s
Department of Health, New York City Clerk’s Marriage
License Bureau and the U.S. Department of Justice’s
Immigration and Naturalization Service were criminally
used as an identification document to produce a falsified
marriage license; a falsified birth certificate; a falsified
request for immigration status; and decades of the
petitioner’s receipt of public assistance from respondent New
York State based on its acceptance of the groom-
identification-lacking marriage affidavit that successfully
removed the petitioner’s husband as financial protector from
the then-pregnant petitioner and her children.
Additionally, in spite of the district court’s, the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security’s and the respondent
New York State appellate court’s recognition of
petitioner’s husband as the former Nigerian Senator
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, the respondent New York State’s
Department of Health and its political subdivision New
York City Clerk’s Marriage License Bureau have
vehemently refused to correct their records to reflect
petitioner and her daughter’s rightful marital and
consanguineous
relationship to their African relative,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
Respondent New York State has normalized the
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause’s extension, the Civil Rights Act that prohibits age
discrimination by allowing the ritualized fellating of
12
ui e z n 3c u z a m
helpless Ashkenazi boys during bris, such that in the City
of New York, eleven (11) Ashkenazi baby boys have
contracted herpes, with two (2) of them dying.19 There has
been an upsurge of the killings of unarmed people of
African descent by law enforcement officers across the
country. Although Chinese citizens and the Chabad
Lubavitch were exposed to COVID-19 during the outbreak
in Wuhan, American citizens of African descent are now
listed as being disproportionately affected because of
issues associated with anti-black racism, with the vast
majority of people still not knowing that anti-Hamite/anti-
Canaanite/anti-African hatred is a defamatory religious
teaching associated with the Babylonian Talmud.
This country is now in the grips of the enforcement
of Israel anti-boycott laws. Israel’s prime minister has: 1)
called for the enforcement of the Babylonian Talmud; 2)
threatened U.S. politicians with exposing those who
engaged in sex with children; but, 3) has withheld the
identities of those U.S. politicians Israel’s prime minister
claims had sex with children from the parents, who like
the petitioner, are worried sick about the effects of rape on
their children, and are victims of the intentional infliction of
emotional distress associated with the inability to obtain
justice for their children because of the respondents’
single-minded determination to support Israel’s Ashkenazi-
led government.
As of the completion of this petition, the petitioner
alleges that the respondents have made themselves
unavailable for service by electronic means – as suggested by
this Court. The respondents have refused to comply with
petitioner’s request for return receipt for e-mail sent to them.
https://_ww_w.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmv/rhtml/mm6122a2.htm7.s_cids
mm6122a
13With the assistance of the district and circuit courts,
the petitioner is again forcibly relegated to the position of a
helpless, nonconsenting sex slave to mimic the sexually
sadistic domestic terrorism, sexual harassment, sexual
predation and psychological gang-rape to which the
respondents subjected the petitioner’s children after
facilitating the use of the fictitious name “Godwin E.
Uzamere” to remove the petitioner’s husband as a financial
protector for the petitioner and her children. The petitioner
also alleges that based on a long-term pattern of behavior
associated with members of the Ashkenazi community who
are jurists, there is a disproportionately high percentage of
them who are pedophile-oriented sexually sadistic predators,
who, when adjudicating the lawsuits of unprotected self-
represented litigants, especially in forma pauperis litigants,
create any legal ruse to use their positions of power
psychologically “gang-rape” helpless pro se litigants20.
The petitioner seeks to avail herself of the benefits
of the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy, Freedom of Speech,
Establishment, Religion, Petition, Due Process and Equal
Protection clauses, and to allow the petitioner to present
her request for certiorari with the openness of which the
attendees of the founding of the National Institute for
Judaic Law availed themselves. More importantly, this
petition seeks to connect respondent New York State’s
enforcement of S2942—A, the Israel Anti-Boycott Law to
20 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Sexual Sadism
Disorder
Diagnostic
Criteria
302.84 ’ (F65.52)
(https://mrkmnls.co/2XtKlgi) Over a period of at least 6 months,
recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological
suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or
behaviors…The diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are
intended to apply both to individuals who freely admit to having such
paraphilic interests and to those who deny any sexual interest in the
physical or psychological suffering of another individual despite
substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
14
ui e z n oc u z a m
the unconstitutional enforcement
Talmud’s Law of Moser.
of the Babylonian
To that end, the petitioner has, in addition to
availing herself of her First Amendment right to petition
the government for a redress of grievances, has further
exercised her First Amendment right to free speech by
informing the members of the European Union and the
African Union of the existence of this petition before filing
it with this honorable Court, as well as members of the
international Hamitic/Canaanite/African community, to
expose the havoc that the continued interference of the
Babylonian Talmud has wrought, and in particular, the
havoc that children of Hamitic/Canaanite/African descent
have suffered, who petitioner alleges like her son, were
gang-raped as a result of the enforcement of the
Babylonian Talmudic Law of Moser, which the petitioner
alleges has now been politicized into the New York State
Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Cheryl D. Uzamere, the petitioner, is a member of
several groups that are protected by federal statutes that
invoke the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause. She is an African American. She is a woman. She
is one of Jehovah’s Witnesses and a servant of the true god,
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ; and hater of Molech, the god of pedophilia, sexual
pervasion associated with pedophilia and child sacrifice.
She was diagnosed as having bipolar disorder, an organic
mental condition in February 1993, that is recognized as a
disability pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act,
and for which she has received Social Security Disability
Insurance retroactively since 1996. She is the mother of
David Paul Walker and Tara Ann Uzamere, African
American children who are victims of sexually sadistic
15terrorism by respondents New York State and New York
City’s Babylonian Talmud-based foster care system, and
who were kidnapped and trafficked by respondent State of
New York and City of New York for purposes of the
Babylonian Talmud/Molech-fomented trafficking of
humans for the sex trade and kidnapping and trafficking
of boys of African descent for anal sodomy. She is an
individual against whom the extrajudicial sentence of
death has been ordered pursuant to the Babylonian
Talmudic crime of meshira/mesira (whistleblowing), a
religious law that is now politicized and legalized by New
York State Executive Order No. 157 and the New York
State Legislative Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A
regarding boycotting Israel.
Based on those matters in which she was personally
involved, and on information and belief as to all other
matters, she makes the following statements under
penalty of perjury.
Statement of Petitioner’s Son, David Paul Walker’s
Sexual Abuse While a Client at JCCA-Edenwald Group
Home
The petitioner became aware of the incident
described below sometime during 2018. The petitioner’s
son, David Paul Walker described an occasion where, while
he was six years old, he was in a setting where the
employees of JCCA-Edenwald did not supervise the
sleeping area, nor provide security cameras or security
guards to ensure that her son’s or other foster children
were safe, in what she alleges was an attempt to hide their
goals of allowing Babylonian Talmud-adherent, sex-crazed
members of the Ashkenazi Jewish community to engage in
the Babylonian Talmudic practice of anally sodomizing the
petitioner’s son:
16
ui e z n Dc u z a m
“Please Mr. Don’t touch me there, I’m only
six…love you not, hate you a lot, Shall we
commence to crucifix???… When I was a little
boy, teenage boy masturbated in front of me,
then politely ask me to lick???… “If you come
near me, I’ll scream”
, First time seeing
someone else’s dick… So easy to pass
judgment, tell everybody else what to do…Say
stranger, my advice but your ass, shall we
suffer together for a spell or two??? Disturbed
by the vacant lifeless expression in my eyes
yes
??? of
Systematic
rape my
soul…prolonged torture of my mind, please
my darling. I wholeheartedly invite you to try
your best…
Statement of Petitioner’s Daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere
That Was Ignored By New York State Supreme Court
Justice Jeffrey S. Sunshine:
The petitioner’s daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere, now a
registered nurse with the State of New York for over 10
years, submitted a New York State-notarized affidavit in
which she described Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, at that time a
senator for the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as her father:
I, Tara A. Uzamere, being duly sworn,
depose and say that:
1) I am the daughter of the Plaintiff
and the Defendant in the above-entitled action.
2) following facts:
I make this Affidavit based on the
3) That the Plaintiff has always told
me that Defendant is my father ever since I was
a child.
174) That I met the Defendant for the first
time at JFK Airport in Jamaica, New York
around the year 2004 to the best of my
recollection.
5)
That I took a photograph of the
Defendant during the aforesaid visit.
Photograph taken at JFK Airport is hereby
attached as Exhibit A.
6) That on the day that I first met the
Defendant at JFK Airport, I called my friend
Eusi Patterson on the cell phone that I used to
take a photograph of the Defendant.
7)
That on the aforesaid day the
Defendant openly and notoriously introduced
himself to Eusi as my father.
8) That I met and visited the
Defendant’s late brother, John Uzamere at 476
Amboy Street.
9) That the Defendant and his
brother George Uzamere openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at 489 Ray
Street, Freeport, New York.
10)
That while I was a resident in
Freeport, New York, I experienced a car
accident, and that George Uzamere and the
Defendant openly and notoriously sent checks
to pay the rest of my car note to Drive
Financial, a financing company based in
Dallas, Texas.
18
uiezn:c u z a m
11) That the Defendant openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at Nichol
Road in Wyandanch, New York.
12) That the Defendant met my
landlord, Martin Marta when the Defendant
visited me while I was living at the aforesaid
address.
13) That during the aforesaid meeting
the Defendant openly and notoriously
identified himself to my landlord as my father.
14) That I spoke with Wellington
Uzamere on the telephone several times before
and after I first met the Defendant.
15) That Wellington Uzamere
referred to the Defendant as „Ehigie.“
16) That based on information
received from members of the Edo/Bini
community as well as my own belief, my facial
structure resembles that of the Defendant as
evidenced in my photograph hereby attached as
Exhibit B.
17) That while I spend three or four
pleasant occasions with the Defendant and
received monetary gifts during those occasions,
the Defendant has never been a consistent part
of my life as I explained in the report [that] I
provided to Nigerian newspaper Huhu Online.
See aforesaid report hereby attached as Exhibit
C.
1918) That based on what I learned at
Long Island College School of Nursing
regarding psychiatric nursing and psychiatric
illnesses, as well as personal day-to-day
observation of the Plaintiff, that while the
Plaintiffs predominate affect is consistent with
what I believe to be hypomania, the Plaintiff is
not psychotic and does not require
hospitalization, as untruthfully implied by
Eugene
Uzamere’s defamatory
characterization of the Plaintiff as „certifiably
insane“ to Nigerian newspaper Point Blank
News Online, hereby attached as Exhibit D.
19) That before 2004 the Defendant
never visited me; never celebrated a birthday
with me; never kissed me; never told me he
loved me; never wiped away my tears; never
talked to me about God; never attended a house
of God with me; never read me a Bible story;
never talked to me about how to comport myself
around men or the importance of being a chaste
woman; never let other men know that I was
precious to him; never let other men know that
they would be responsible to him if they hurt
me; never held my hand; never walked with me;
never sat me on his lap; never played games
with me; never took me to the movies; never
picked me up; never gave me a hug; never
attended a school meeting with my teachers;
never visited me in the hospital; never told me
he was proud of me; never accompanied me to a
father/daughter dance, never attended a
graduation; never invited other members of the
Edo/Bini community to a naming ceremony in
honor of my birth; never told me that he was
glad I was born and never treated me like he
loved me and wanted to protect me from the
20
ui e 2 n ocuzam
dangers of the world the way normal fathers do
with their daughters, and especially in the
manner that Nigerian men are known to treat
their children.
20) That the falsely concocted
„counter-affidavit“ and the falsely concocted
affirmation by Eugene Uzamere makes me
feel heartsick because I have always been
made to believe by the Plaintiff, the
Defendant and members of the Defendant’s
family that the Defendant is my father and
that being a blood member of the Uzamere
clan, a blood member of the proud and ancient
Edo/Bini nation and culture and being a
native Nigerian based on consanguinity are
my birthrights and a part of who I am; that the
aforesaid „counter-affidavit and attorney’s
affirmation are emotionally and psychologically
abusive as they suggest that I am a bastard
child while the Defendant is not willing to end
the question of paternity by taking a simple
DNA test.
21) That I now experience financial
difficulties such that I do not have money to
return to college to continue studying nursing,
and that because of the Plaintiffs advanced age
and disability, it is very difficult for her to
obtain employment to help me pay for college;
PELL grant rejection information is attached at
Exhibit E.
22) That I am willing to submit myself
for honest DNA testing to confirm that the
Defendant is my father if conditions can be
controlled so that the Defendant does not know
and cannot access the location of the laboratory
21where said DNA test is performed so that the
Defendant does not unduly influence anyone to
lie about the results of the DNA test as it seems
the Defendant was able to do on the marriage
affidavit where the municipal clerk signed
his/her name to indicate that he/she verified
the Defendant’s age, but that on inspection of
said page, did not mark off any box to indicate
the type of identification the municipal clerk
used to verify the Defendant’s age and date of
birth and identity; see Plaintiffs Affidavit and
Application for License to Marry, top of back
page hereby attached as Exhibit F.
Wherefore, as the Defendant has forced
the Plaintiff and I to suffer domestic violence as
identified by the U.S. Justice Department’s
Office of Violence Against Women, I
respectfully ask that this Court considers that
the Plaintiff is not just pleading for herself but
for our entire family; that this Court grant the
Plaintiffs lawful and just request to dismiss
attorney
Eugene Uzamere’s falsified
affirmation in its entirety, and to grant the
Plaintiffs motion for default judgment and
money judgment in its entirety.
The basis of the petitioner’s request for a writ of
certiorari by this Court is the lower courts’ refusal of her
request for declaratory and injunctive relief. The
petitioner asked the lower courts for two things: 1) the
right to speak; and 2) for the lower court to prevent the
respondents from violating the petitioner’s First
Amendment right to speak. The response of both the
district court and the circuit court were “Plaintiff, we will
not allow you to speak about issues regarding the gang-
rape of your children, the falsified marriage-affidavit or
other issues contained in the 540 exhibits of your lawsuit.”
22
ui e z n oc u z a m
The petitioner requested the lower courts to grant
her First Amendment right to speak in court about, among
other things, the rape of her children. The Second Circuit,
a Sherman-Antitrust-violating, white supremacist,
Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi-led judicial
cartel where every U.S. attorney that received the
petitioner’s complaints are members of the Ashkenazim,
has consistently demonstrated to the petitioner that black
lives do not matter. The lower courts’ judiciary know that
with a disproportionate percentage of the Second Circuit’s
judiciary being members of a religion that teaches that
people of African descent are meant to be enslaved, that
the petitioner’s chances of being granted certiorari are
slim to none.
Pursuant to a recently enacted law, New York State
Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A, (“2942–A” or “the
Act”), the State of New York requires government
contractors to certify that they are not engaged in boycotts
of Israel or territories controlled by Israel.
The petitioner is the sole proprietor of a home-based
typing service. Over the course of several decades, the
respondents have sought to extort, defraud, and otherwise
torturously injure the petitioner by means of a plan they
conceived and executed against the petitioner and her
children. It has been continuously carried out a
racketeering-influenced criminal organization led by
members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi
leadership in positions of great power, among others,
immigration attorneys, Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro,
New York State Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey S.
Sunshine and other New York State Supreme Court
justices/judges, federal and municipal law enforcement
officers, Affinity Federal Credit Union; Metavante
Corporation; Verizon, Inc.; the New York City Housing
Authority; New York City Comptroller’s Office’s 50-H
23attorney Jane Barrett; New York City Department of
Information Technology and Telecommunication; the City
University of New York; the New York City Police
Department; Web.com; the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission; the Social Security
Administration; the New York State Attorney General’s
Office; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; New York
City Health and Hospitals Corporation; New York State
Office of Mental Health, Brookdale Hospital Medical
Center, Interfaith Medical Center; the National Credit
Union Administration, America Works, Inc.; Brooklyn
Defender, Inc.; Federal Defenders of Brooklyn; Federation
Employment and Guidance Services (FEGS); and other
governmental and nongovernmental employees under the
control of respondent New York State’s powerful
Ashkenazi leadership for whom the petitioner provided the
circuit court with irrefutable proof of embezzlement of the
petitioner’s SSDI funds; malicious prosecution; unlawful
imprisonment; medical malpractice; but against whom
respondent New York State and its subdivision New York
City have done nothing.
The petitioner alleges that the Act superficially
seeks to suppress participation in political boycott
campaigns aimed at Israel and/or territories controlled by
Israel, particularly Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions
(“BDS”) campaigns. These campaigns seek to apply
economic pressure on Israel to protest the Israeli
government’s treatment of Palestinians and occupation of
the Palestinian territories.
The petitioner alleges that the real purpose of the
Act is to facilitate what the Israeli scientific and public
health sectors, the Israel movie entitled Conventional Sins
and CBS Channel 2 News identify as a disproportionately
high percentage of Ashkenazi Jews who have a
predisposition for pedophilia, and to use the Babylonian
Talmud’s misinterpretation regarding the Holy Bible’s
24
Ui G Z n 0c u 7. a ra
identity of Ham and his son Canaanite as the religious
excuse to subject them to international sexualized
enslavement and tyranny the Jehovah God and the U.S.
Constitution forbid. The petitioner alleges that, based on
historical records: a) from the completion of the writing of
the Babylonian Talmud; b) to the Babylonian Talmud’s
promulgation of the inferiority of people of African descent;
c) to Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership’s monopolization of the African slave trade
where Africans, including their children were anally
sodomized; d) to Ashkenazi Jew-controlled Israel’s murder
of over 100,000 Arab-Jewish and Palestinian children
during the Ringworm Experiment; e) to Israel’s Knesset’s
acknowledgment of the Ashkenazi Jew-controlled
kidnapping, torturous experimentation and murder of
thousands of Yemeni Jewish children; f) to the Franklin
Scandal where children, predominately European boys
were removed from foster homes to be anally raped; g) to
the disproportionately high percentage of Ashkenazi
Jewish children who are fellated after circumcision, some
of who contracted herpes and died; h) to Jeffrey Epstein’s
numerous international forays for the purpose of raping
European American children; i) to New York State’s
warehousing of boys of African descent in distantly located
group homes where boys like my son, David Paul Walker
are anally sodomized; j) to Electric Intifada’s description
of Ashkenazi Jew-controlled weaponized rape of
Palestinians; k) to New York State’s immigration policy
that disproportionately admits individuals from South
Asia and the Middle East, parts of the world where the
institutionalized prostitution of children has been
normalized; 1) to Israel’s citizenry’s desperate attempts to
stop the flow of Ashkenazi Jewish pedophiles from using
Aliyah to escape prosecution in countries where they have
raped children, just to escape to Israel to rape children
there; the respondents have exhibited, not just a glaring
refusal to protect children, but an even more glaring
ability to create impoverished children who are trafficked
25and anally raped in its foster care system. The, petitioner
alleges that the respondents’ leaders are violent,
pedophilic sodomites, and that the BDS issue is a cover to
deflect attention from Ashkenazi Jewish’ leadership’s
organic predisposition for pedophilia.
Not only does the petitioner allege that respondent
New York State’s Anti-Boycott law is a cover for the
Ashkenazi community’s organic predisposition with
pedophilia and sexual sadism, the petitioner alleges that
the enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott law is a
violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Act; 18
U.S.C. § 1961-1968 regarding obstruction, domestic
terrorism and Hobbs Act extortion; a violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 873 regarding blackmail; and is as much an act of
sexually sadistic domestic terrorism and psychological
torture as is Israel’s prime minister’s act of sexualized,
blackmail/psychological torture regarding his threat to
expose U.S. politicians who are pedophiles21 relating to the
fate of the missing Yemenite children of the 1950s22, while
intentionally inflicting emotional distress on the parents
of the children who Israel’s prime minister claims were
raped by withholding the names of those U.S. politicians
Israel’s prime minister claims raped children. –
21 Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile Ring —
Chinese https://bit.ly/3hHE0_Cy_.
22 Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies Murdered in Medical
Experiments, https://bit.ly/2ZwEitY.
26
uieznsi
c u z a m
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION
I. New York State Sessions Law S2942—A is
U nconstitutional.
a) Other Federal Courts Have Found that
the Israel Anti-Boycott Law is
U nconstitutional
In an article entitled Third Federal Court Rules
Anti-BDS Law Violates First Amendment3, the website
TheFire.org stated:
Last week, a federal court in Austin,
Texas issued an order blocking enforcement of
a state law dubbed Texas’ “anti-BDS bill” by
the governor. Texas House Bill 89, enacted in
2017, required government contractors to
certify that they do not and would not boycott
Israel while doing business with a state
entity.
The
order in Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District granted the
preliminary injunction motions of five sole
proprietors in two consolidated lawsuits filed
in late 2018 by the ACLU and the Council on
American-Islamic Relations.
Last year, federal district courts in Kansas24 and
Arizona25 sustained First Amendment challenges and
issued injunctions against enforcement of the state laws.
23 Third federal court rules anti-BDS law violates First Amendment,
https://bit.ly/3hQ9MBS.
24 Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp.3d 1007 (2018)
25 Jordahl, et al v. Brnovich, et al, 18-16896
27b) Respondent New York State’s Sessions Law
S2942—A Violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
the Hobbs Act.
The petitioner alleges that enforcement of New York
State’s Israel Anti-Boycott law sets the stage for its own
undoing because it violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
RICO law regarding the Hobbs Act.
The News Punch website published an article entitled
Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile
Ring, the article states:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
just declassified 400,000 documents that
expose child trafficking and a child sex ring
in Washington.
Per se violations of the Sherman Antitrust law do not
allow justifications. Conversely, while per se acts cannot be
defended or justified, there are limited exceptions where
courts will instead apply the rule of reason.26 For example,
in Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 363 F 3d.
761 (8th Cir. 2004), the Eighth Circuit held that an
agreement between Ford and a trade association of
limousine converters to prevent the plaintiff from
advertising its products in the trade association publications
was motivated by safety concerns. Thus, the court applied
the rule of reason even though this was a (non-price)
horizontal conspiracy among competitors.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on It
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
26 BonaLaw PC – Does the Group Boycott Violate Antitrust Laws
https://bit.ly/2Nop6aN
28
ui e z n oc u z a m
The website The Chronicle for Social Change
published an article dated February 27, 2019 entitled New
York City Confronts Massive Overrepresentation of Black
Children in Foster Care. The article states:
… the foster care system is expanding its efforts
to address longstanding disparities, especially
for black children whose presence in the system
is roughly double their share of the general
population.
…It’s part of ACS’ recent focus on “lifting the
value of racial disproportionality to the value of
safety and risk within our system,” says David
Peters, ACS’ head of the Office of Equity
Strategies (OES). That focus was prompted in
part by a legislative package De Blasio
signed in September of 2017, which mandated
training on implicit bias, discrimination and
structural inequity at city agencies.
…Fifty-three percent of the roughly 9,000
children in the city foster care system identified
as black in 2017, according to state data. Yet,
only around a quarter of all New Yorkers
younger than 18 are black.
The petitioner alleges that the implicit bias against
black children is directly related to the Babylonian Talmud’s
explicit dissemination of anti-black hatred, its espousal of
pedophilia and the Ashkenazi community’s organic
predisposition for pedophilia; however Babylonian Talmud-
adherent, Ashkenazi leadership has been as silent on these
religious doctrines just as nearly all other members of the
Ashkenazi community have done.
– 29d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
et al.
The lawsuit entitled Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et al,
makes the following statements:
For most Americans, the concepts relied upon
by the Palestinian Plaintiffs in this case (i.e.
ethnic cleansing, genocide, denationalization,
and dehumanization) are foreign concepts not
part of normal American vernacular. However,
these concepts are as American as apple pie.
The indigenous American Indian population
and the African slaves brought to America have
been victimized by these identical war crimes.
Each group has been subject to ethnic
cleansing, genocide, expropriation of private
property, confinement to reservations and
ghettos, wholesale denial of their fundamental
freedoms, subjected to a biased criminal justice
system, and deemed to be irrelevant and
disenfranchised members of American society.
Like Palestinian-Americans these groups can
file their own war crime lawsuits here in federal
district court. The reasons: (a) the similarity of
injuries sustained (wanton destruction of
property, starvation diets, and poisoning of
water wells and livestock); (b) the identical
means employed to subjugate these groups
(The New York Police Department murdered
Amadou Diallo with 51 bullets and Mr. Shapira
used 87 bullets to massacre 29 Palestinians);
30
iii e 2 n oc u z a m
/
and (c) for over 400 years, they have been
victims of an ethnic cleansing/genocidal
campaign similar to the one started by
Defendant PMN in 1998. See U.S. State
Department Manual on the 10 Stages of
Genocide, Exhibit B.
With respect to the role that Defendant Cuomo
played in terms of denationalization, he has not
directly funded international terrorists.
However, along with his hero, Defendant
Hikind, he has deprived 195 million Americans
in thirty-six different states of the right to
support the Palestinian cause and criticize
PMN’s campaign to denationalize the
Palestinian population…On behalf of the
Israeli government, not his New York state
constituency (which rejected the anti-BDS
legislation), Defendant Cuomo convinced forty
governors to enact an unconstitutional
executive order criminalizing the anti-Boycott,
Divestiture, and Sanction movement
[hereinafter BDS].
The New York State anti-BDS legislation
violated fundamental liberties cherished by
Americans, e.g. their right to criticize a foreign
country’s human rights record. That legislation
requires US. citizens to sign what amounts to
loyalty oaths to Israel. It has had a serious
chilling effect on freedom of speech and interstate
commerce (italics added). The Israeli
spokespersons in charge of this program and
tasked with convincing their fellow Americans
that Palestinians are “savages” not deserving of
their own state are Defendants Cuomo and
Hikind, even though they are not registered as
Israeli agents under the Federal Agent
31Registration Act 22 U.S.C. 611 (hereinafter
FARA).
II.
The Circuit Court’s and District Court’s Decision
is in Direct Contravention of Its Own Mandate
concerning Court Corruption that was
established in Chevron v. Donziger.
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121
(10th Cir. 1985), the court stated „Fraud upon the court is
fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and
is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents,
false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a
member is corrupted or influenced or influence is
attempted or where the judge has not performed his
judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of
the court have been directly corrupted.”
“Fraud upon the court“ has been defined by the 7th
Circuit Court of Appeals to „embrace that species of fraud
which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a
fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the
judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its
impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for
adjudication.“ Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7
Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ‘I 60.23. The 7th
Circuit further stated: „a decision produced by fraud upon
the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never
becomes final.“
Fraud upon the court violates the Supremacy Clause
of the U.S. Constitution because it violates the Fifth
Amendment’s Due Process Clause. The petitioner further
holds that when judges are involved in acts of fraud upon
the court related to a particular issue, and/or similar
issues that are related to a specific litigant or specific
groups of litigants, especially in relation to issues
regarding the commission of federal law, those acts
32
ui ez nsc u z a m
constitute violation of 18 USC § 1961-1968, RICO laws,
especially as they pertain to the second circuit’s
enforcement of Chevron v. Donziger.
On August 8, 2016, the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court rendered
in the case Chevron v. Donziger, et al (See 974 F.Supp.2d
362 (2014)).
The district court found that defendants Steven
Donziger and his law firm engaged in RICO-predicate acts
under
the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 that resulted in
a corrupt judgment by a Ecuadorian court, and that
because the defendants’ acts led to the Ecuadorian court’s
corrupt decision, the judgment was unenforceable in
federal court under federal law and under New York
common law.
Liberally sprinkled throughout the circuit court’s
decision are the terms “obstruction of justice (pages 96, 97,
98), and “procured by fraud” (pages 70, 109, 111, 112).
The Second Circuit’s decision in Chevron v.
Donziger, et al, in affirming the district court’s decision,
held that the defendants: 1) submitted fraudulent
evidence, 2) told “half-truths…to U.S. courts in attempts
to prevent exposure of other wrongdoing.”
In the petitioner’s case, the district court’s decision
named petitioner’s prior lawsuits: 1) Uzamere v. Allen E.
Kaye, P.C; 2) Uzamere v. Cuomo; 3) Uzamere v. Rice; and
4) Uzamere v. United States.
The district court’s decision stated that:
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action
arising from her 1979 marriage to and
33subsequent abandonment by her husband,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere… Plaintiff submits to
the Court a 205-page complaint with 540
pages of exhibits.
The petitioner cannot understand how the district
court was honestly able to count the 540 pages of exhibits,
while missing the first exhibit: respondent New York State
Department of Health’s/New York City Clerk’s marriage
affidavit that bore the petitioner/bride’s legal name and
proof of identity but failed to provide petitioner’s
husband/groom’s legal name and accompanying proof of
identity.
The district court also removed 79 of 90 defendants
from the petitioner’s case without explanation, and later
withdrew its own decision granting IFP status after the
petitioner filed her complaint regarding the district court’s
unexplained removal of 79 defendants from her lawsuit
(see Appendix C).
Based on the Second Circuit’s enforcement of RICO
laws regarding court corruption in the case Chevron v.
Donziger, the petitioner believes that she has justiciable
issues regarding the district court’s RICO-predicate acts
based on the district court’s and respondent New York
State’s courts’ acts of obstruction of justice regarding
respondent New York State’s facilitation of her husband’s
and his immigration attorneys’ acts of immigration fraud,
identity fraud, and the removal of the petitioner’s husband
as
financial protector to facilitate the sexual violence
committed against the petitioner’s children while they
were clients of respondent New York State’s foster care
system.
34
ui e 2 n o
:c u z a m
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment Right to
advise this Court of Jehovah’s Viewpoint
The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public
Affairs submitted its amicus brief to present Babylonian
Law as humane. However, the amicus brief submitted by
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s in the case Bryan v. Moore was
deceptive.27 The amicus brief cites references that are
unchallengeable to the Babylonian Talmud-ignorant
public who do not know or do not have access to the
Babylonian Talmud. To those who have knowledge of the
Babylonian Talmud, or who like the petitioner, have
downloaded the Babylonian Talmud in its entirety can see
that the cited references were not relevant in Mr. Bryan’s
case. Even worse, COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s capitalizing of Mr.
Bryan’s unfortunate situation was a shameless attempt at
self-aggrandizement and aggrandizement of Babylonian
Talmudic law and Ashkenazi Jewish culture. The brief
itself makes the statement:
COLPA and IAJLJ are vitally interested in
promoting the study of, and respect for,
principles of Jewish Law as they have been
applied throughout the history of the Jewish
people. COLPA and the national groups that
it routinely represents promote and
encourage in-depth study of Talmudic texts.
IAJLJ has sponsored public lectures in
Jewish Law and promoted the publication of
scholarly essays in the field of Jewish Law.
27 “…Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a
(https://halakhah.com/pdfynezikin/Baba_Kama.pdf): Where a suit arises
between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former
according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: ‘This is our law’; so
also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and
say [to the other party:] ‘This is your law’; but if this cannot be done, we
use subterfuges to circumvent him.
35While COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s attorneys cited, but did
not quote Leviticus 20 regarding the use of fire to punish
men who have sexual relations with their mothers-in law
along with their wives, they failed to mention what
Jehovah’s word says in the verses above regarding
Jehovah’s condemnation of the worship of Molech:
Leviticus 20:14: And if a man [take] with his
wife also her mother, it is wickedness: they
shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that
there be no wickedness among you.
Leviticus 20:1-5:And Jehovah spoke unto
Moses, saying: Moreover, thou shalt say to
the children of Israel: Whosoever he be of the
children of Israel, or of the strangers that
sojourn in Israel, that giveth of his seed unto
Molech; he shall surely be put to death; the
people of the land shall stone him with stones.
I also will set My face against that man, and
will cut him off from among his people,
because he hath given of his seed unto
Molech, to defile My sanctuary, and to profane
My holy name.
And if the people of the land do at all hide
their eyes from that man, when he giveth of
his seed unto Molech, and put him not to
death…
Another glaring omission that attorneys for
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s made regarding the Babylonian
Talmud’s pretense at humanity is stated earlier in this
petition in Tractate Sanhedrin 64a:
36
uiEznsc u 2 a m
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Jehovah’s word the Bible has long identified the
nation of Israel as worshippers of Molech. Ancient history
identifies Molech as the god of pedophilia and child
sacrifice.
Jehovah’s Prophet Amos, as well as the Apostle
Stephen says the following regarding Israel’s worship of
Molech:
Amos 5:23: “Did ye bring unto Me sacrifices
and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O
house of Israel? So shall ye take up Siccuth
your king and Chiun your images, the star of
your god, which ye made to yourselves.
Therefore, will I cause you to go into captivity
beyond Damascus, saith He, whose name is
Jehovah God of hosts.”
Acts 7:42-43: “…just as it is written in the
book of the Prophets: ‘It was not to me that
you made offerings and sacrifices for 40 years
in the wilderness, was it, O house of
Israel? But it was the tent of Mo loch and the
star of the god Re phan that you took up, the
images that you made to worship them. So, I
will deport you beyond Babylon.”
In 2012, the University of Ben Gurion in the Negev
submitted a report to the U.S. National Institutes of
Health entitled History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties
37in a Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra – orthodox Males with
Pedophilia based on the Ashkenazi Jewish community’s
problem with pedophilia as a public health concern. It
says:
Results: … 82.6% of participants were victims
of sexual trauma as children and 87% suffer
from some kind of organic vulnerability
(learning disabilities, disinhibitions, etc.).
Limitations: Limitations of this small
convenience sample that influence ability to
generalize are discussed.
Conclusions: The current survey indicates
that in this sample, the ultra-orthodox male
pedophile was frequently a victim of
childhood sexual trauma and exhibited
indications of organic vulnerabilities. This is
more pronounced than findings in previous
studies and calls for further research in order
to understand the underlying causes.
Sexual abuse in the ultra-orthodox
community is a serious and under-researched
phenomenon. …
Lastly, the petitioner makes the following
observations as a respectful reminder that there is a Power
that transcends the power of this Court, and that the
petitioner is obedient to that Power. That Power is
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ.
In the Bible there are examples that show Jehovah’s
condemnation of gang rape, group sexual depravity and
child sacrifice. Genesis 19:1-23 (Sodom and Gomorrah);
Numbers 25 (Israel’s being lured into worship of Baal-Peor
38
ui e z n dcuzam
to engage in group sex); Judges 19-21 (gang rape and
murder of a Levite’s concubine. These acts are consistent
with individuals who are worshippers of Molech, practices
that the Babylonian Talmud allows, but Jehovah Himself
and the U.S. Constitution forbid.
Jehovah’s told the Prophet Moses to warn Israel,
and by extension, the rest of the world about His hatred
for Molech worshippers in Leviticus 20:1: Any man of
Israel and any foreigner …who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail.
CONCLUSION
The Petition for a writ of certiorari should be
granted.
Respectfully submitted,
CHERYL D. UZAMERJE
Sole Proprietor 1/
Uzamere Word Processing More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
chexyl.uzamere_@juzamerewordpr
QC.essing.net
39
i
c u z a m
Supreme Court, U.S.
FILED
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
No.
?o-M
•Bn W&t
Supreme Court pt tfie 3Hmteb States?
CHERYL D. UZAMERE AS SOLE PROPRIETOR OF
UZAMERE WORD PROCESSING & MORE
Petitioner,
v.
THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
Respondents.
On Petition For A Writ of Certiorari
To The United States Court of Appeals
For the Second Circuit
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Appearing Pro Se
Uzamere Word Processing
& More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
cheryl .uzamere @uzamere
w_Qrdpr_QC.essing.net RECEIVED
AUG 1 3 2020
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
SUPREME COURT, II RQUESTIONS PRESENTED
The questions presented are:
1.
unconstitutional:
Whether New York State Law S2942—A is
a) Federal Courts find that New York State Law
S2942—A is unconstitutional.
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates the
Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs Act.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on Its
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et
al.
2.
Whether the circuit court’s and district court’s
decisions are in contravention of the Second Circuit’s
mandate concerning court corruption that was established in
Chevron v. Donziger.
3.
Whether the petitioner has the First
Amendment right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
viewpoint regarding the Babylonian Talmud’s espousal of
the worship of the god Molech, the god of pedophilia.
i
ui e z n oc u z a m
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner
Cheryl D. Uzamere, Individually and as Sole Proprietor
of Uzamere Word Processing & More
Respondents
New York State The Honorable
Pamela L. Fisher
The Honorable
Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor
New York State
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Letitia James
Attorney General
New York State
The Honorable
Janet Difiore
Chief Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Robin S. Garson
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Bernard J. Graham
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
nThe Honorable
Lawrence K. Marks
Chief Administrative Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lara J. Genovesi
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lawrence Knipel
Administrative Judge
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Dawn Jimenez-Salta
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
The Honorable
Jeffrey Sunshine Matrimonial Kathy J. King
Practice Advisory and Rules Justice of the
Committee, Statewide
Kings County
Coordinating Judge for
Supreme Court
Matrimonial Cases
New York State
New York State
Unified Court System
Unified Court System
Susan Kaufman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Donald Kurtz
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
m
ui e z n oThe Honorable
Betty Weinberg Ellerin
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Sondra Miller
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jacqueline Silbermann
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Alton Abramowitz, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
IV
c u 2 a m
The Honorable
Carl Landicino
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Katherine A. Levine
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Richard J. Montelione
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lisa S. Ottley
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemSusan L. Bender, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Roseann Branda, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Andrew Crecca
Justice of the Supreme Court,
Suffolk County Supervising
Judge of Matrimonial Matters
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Kathleen Donelli, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
v
uezn:
The Honorable
Mark Partnow
Justice of the
Kings County .
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michael Pesce
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Eric Prus
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Karen B. Rothenberg
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court Systemc u z a m
The Honorable
The Honorable
Laura A. Drager
Leon Ruchelsman
Acting Justice of the Supreme Justice of the
Court New York County,
Kings County Supreme
Matrimonial Practice
Court
Advisory and Rules
New York State
Committee
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
Donna England, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Stephen J. Gassman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen Gesmer
Associate Justice
Appellate Division for the
First Department
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wayne P. Saitta
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Kenneth Sherman
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Debra Silber
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
viThe Honorable
Cheryl A. Joseph
Acting Supreme Court Justice
Supreme Court, Suffolk
County, Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Elena Karabatos, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jeffrey D. Lebowitz
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Christopher S. Mattingly Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Vll
meznj
The Honorable
Martin Solomon
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen M. Spodek
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court for The New
York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable Marsha
L. Steinhardt Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Peter P. Sweeney
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemMichael A. Mosberg Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Hemalee J. Patel, Esq.,
Referee of the Supreme Court
Richmond County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Florence Richardson Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Yesenia Rivera, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
vm
c u z a m
The Honorable Delores
J. Thomas Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wavny Toussaint
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
David B. Vaughan
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Richard
Velasquez Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemThe Honorable
Emily Ruben
Family Court Judge
Queens County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Sharon Kelly Sayers, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Carolyn
E. Wade Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Zenith T. Taylor, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Eric A. Tepper, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Edgar G. Walker
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michelle Weston
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Paul Wooten
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
IX
uezn:c u 2 a m
Bruce J. Wagner, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Michael McSweeney
New York City Clerk
of the Council
Harriet Weinberger, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Patrick L. Synmoie
Executive Agency
Counsel
New York City
Clerk’s Office
The Honorable
Howard A. Zucker
Hope Zimmerman Justice of M.D., J.D.,
the Supreme Court, Nassau Commissioner
County Matrimonial Practice New York State
Advisory and Rules
Department of Health
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Rachel A. Adams
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Richard Zahnleuter
General Counsel
New York State
Department of Health
xThe Honorable
Sylvia G. Ash
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Loren Baily-Schiffman
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Johnny Lee Baynes
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Reginald A. Boddie
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Andrew M. Saul
Commissioner
Social Security
Administration
Royce B. Min
General Counsel
Social Security
Administration
Monica Chyn
Social Security
Admini stration
Gail Ennis ■
Inspector General
Social Security
Administration
xi
uisznsThe Honorable
Theresa Ciccotto
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Lissette Colon
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Matthew
D’Emic Justice of the
Kings County Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Jeanine Edwards
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Xll
cuzam
Ellen Sovern
Regional General
Counsel, Regional II
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe7“Jane Doe,
Office Manager, Social
Security District Office
3386 Crescent Street,
Brooklyn, New York,
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe”/“Jane Doe,
Office Manager
Social Security
District Office
Social Security
Administration
“Jane Doe”
, a.k.a. “Ms.
Flores, Pass Cadre
Worker, Supervisor,
Social Security District
Office
Social Security
Administrationc u z a m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS xiv
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES xxi
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1
OPINIONS BELOW 1
JURISDICTION 1
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
PROVISIONS……………………………………… 1
INTRODUCTION 5
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 15
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION 27
I. New York State Law
Unconstitutional:……………..
S2942—A is
27
a) Federal Courts find that New York State
Law S2942—A is unconstitutional…………. 27
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates
the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs
Act 28
xivi
c) New York State Abrogated the
Fourteenth Amendment Regarding Age
and Race Based on Its Enforcement of the
Israel Anti-Boycott Law……………………….. 28
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of
Genocide against Palestinians and New
York State’s Acts of Genocide against Black
People are under federal scrutiny in the
case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin
Netanyahu, etal.……………………………………. 30
II.
The Circuit Courts and District Court’s
Decision are in Contravention of the Second
Circuit’s Mandate concerning Court
Corruption that was established in Chevron
v. Donziger.…………………………………………..……
32
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment
Right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
Viewpoint……………………………………………………
35
CONCLUSION
39
APPENDIX A
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3825-cv dated April 10, 2020 3
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3402-cv dated October 24, 2019 4
U.S. District Court Bar Order
19-cv-9064…………………………… 5-7
U.S. District Court Dismissal
19-cv-9064………………………….. 8-12
xv
ui u z n oi
c u 2 a m
APPENDIX B
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 108b,
footnote 34……………………………………………………………. 5
Artsot Ha-Hayyim, pages 52a/52b 8
Midrash Rabbah, Vol. 1, page 293 11
Legends of the Jews, Vol. page 169
The Curse of Drunkenness………… 13
Come and Hear, Sex with Children
by Talmud Rules………………………… 15
History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties in a
Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra-Orthodox Males
with Pedophilia……………………………………………….. 40
News Punch — News Punch — Netanyahu To Release
Evidence of a Pedophile in Washington DC…………… 48
Veterans Today, Larry King, Overachiever 54
Haaretz, A Nation of Pedophiles 66
Haaretz, Defying a Conspiracy of Silence about
Pedophilia…………………………..………………………. 68
Haaretz, Israel Become a Refuge for Pedophiles
Warns Advocate for Child Sex Abuse…………….. 69
Haaretz, Israel Admits Ethiopian Women Were
Given Birth Control Shots…………………………….. 70
The Truth about Prostitution in Israel 71
xviThe Haredim (Orthodox Jews) Who Crowd Tel Aviv
Brothels……………………………………………………………… 72
Tikum Olam: The Ringworm Scandal: When Israeli
Doctors Killed Tens of Thousands of Arab Jewish
Children…………………………………………………………….. 77
Tikun Olam: Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies
Murdered in Medical Experiments, Abducted from
Parents, and Exploited in Paid National Institutes of
Health Experiments……………………………………..…………. 81
Telesur: 59,000 Palestinian Children Physically
Abused by Israel…………………………………………… 86
Monoweiss: Baltimore is Here; Ethiopian Jews
Protest Police Brutality in Jerusalem………….. 87
Anadolu Agency: Ethiopian Jews Suffer Racism in
Israel………………………………………………………………… 90
Personal Representative to the Dawabsheh Family v.
Benjamin Netanyahu……………………………………………. 91
The Ten Stages of Genocide 271
APPENDIX C
David P. Walker’s Facebook Statement 6
Tara A. Uzamere’s Affidavit and Exhibits 7
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Affidavit 11-12
xvn
iu e z n oI
\
c u z a m
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Certificate/License…………………….. 13
New York State Department of Health Father-
Identity-Lacking Birth Certificate………………… 14
1-130 Falsified Immigration Form 15
1-214 Complaint Form to Immigration and
Naturalization Service…………………………... 16-19
Attorney Osato Eugene Uzamere Falsified
Affirmation…………………………………………….. 20-21
Ehigie Uzamere Falsified Affidavit
(Posing as “Godwin E. Uzamere”)… 22-27
Respondent Honorable Justice Jeffrey Sunshine
Interlocutory Decision, page 9…………………………. 28
Respondent Honorable Jeffrey Sunshine
Decision Regarding Identity of Petitioner’s
Husband Ehigie Uzamere……………………….. 29-30
FOIA Response from U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services Regarding Identity of
Ehigie Uzamere with Exhibits…………………. 31-33
General Docket Sheet for Docket No. 19-3402
as of Julyl2, 2020……………………………………… 34-38
Order of Dismissal/Show Cause with
Superimposed Date October 17, 2010
38-43
Petitioner’s Notice on Record of Appeal dated
October 17, 2019…………..……………………………. 44-48
XVlllPetitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Declaration of Motion to Withdraw Court’s
Fraudulent Sua Sponte Notice of Interlocutory
Appeal Docket No. 19-3402 dated
October 22, 2019……………………………………………. 49-185
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York, Case No. 19-3402……………………..
186
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York with Mandate for Case No. 19-3402 187
General Docket Sheet for Docket 19-3825 188-196
Docket Notice and Notice of Appeal for
Docket 19-3825 (pages 1-5) Dated
November 13, 2019…………………………… 197-201
Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
and Certificate of Services dated
December 16, 2019…………………………….. 202-203
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Affidavit/Declaration in Support of Motion
Dated December 16, 2019……………………………… 204-205
Petitioner’s Brief, Page 1 dated
December 16, 2019………………… 206
Letter from Benjamin Torrance dated
January 6, 2020……………………………… 207-208
Letter from Oren L. Zeve dated
January 6, 2020…………………….
209-211
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief dated
January 15, 2020……………………………………… 212
xix
I
1
ui e z n a
!\
c u z
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix A
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 213
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix B
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 214
Petitioner’s Combined Amended Response
And Reply and Motion in Support dated
January 15, 2020…………………………………… 215
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
dated January 21, 2020…………………………………… 216
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix A dated January 21, 2020………………… 217
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix B dated January 21, 2020………………… 218
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix C dated January 21, 2020………………… 219
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix D dated January 21, 2020……………….. 220
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement
and Combined Amended Affidavit in Support
dated January 31, 2020……………………………… 221
xxTABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District 27
Bryan v. Moore
7, 35
Bulloch v. United States,
763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985) 21, 32
Chevron v. Donziger 1, 21, 32, 33, 34
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive
Health, et al., 462 U.S. 416, 103 S. Ct. 2481; 76 L.
Ed. 2d 687……………………………………………………….. 1, 21, 32,
Federal Communications Commission, v. Fox
Television Stations, 10-1293, 567 U.S. 239, 132 S.
Ct. 2307; 183 L. Ed. 2d 234; 2012 WL 2344462;
2012 U.S. LEXIS 4661;…………………………………….. 21
Johnson v. United States, 13-7120, 576 U.S. 591,
135 S. Ct. 2551; 192 L. Ed. 2d 569;………………..…. 21
Jordahl v. Brnovich 21
Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968) 21,32
Kolender, et al. v. Edward Lawson , 461 U.S. 352,
103 S. Ct. 1855; 75 L. Ed. 2d 903………………………. 21
Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1007 (2018) 21
Margaret Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville,
70-5030, 405 U.S. 156, 92 S. Ct. 839; 31 L. Ed. 2d
110; 1972…………………………………………………………….. 21
xxi
ui e z n o
i
ic u z a m
Personal Representative of the Dawabsheh
Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
etal.……………………………………………………….i, 15, 17, 22, 30
Sessions v. Dimaya\ 15-1498, 584 U.S., 138 S. Ct.
1204; 200 1. L. Ed. 2d 549; 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2497 22
Uzamere v. Allen E. Kaye, P.C., l:09-CV-3506,
S.D.N.Y. April 2, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 09-
1600-cv (2d Cir. June 24, 2009), cert, denied, 558
U.S. 965 (Oct. 13, 2009)…..………………………………. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Cuomo, No. ll-CV-2831 (E.D.N.Y. June
22, 2011), appeal dismissed, No. 11-2713-cv (2d Cir.
Nov. 28, 2011), cert denied, 565 U.S. 1264 (Mar. 19,
2012)………………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Rice, No. 08-CV-0891 (NGG)
(E.D.N.Y. July 6, 2007)……………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. United States, No. 13-505S, 2013 WL
5781216 (D.R.I. Oct. 25, 2013), affd, No.13-2454 (1st
Cir. Apr. 11, 2014), cert, denied, 135 S. Ct. 451 (Nov.
3, 2014)……………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Village of Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside,
Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 102 S. Ct.
1186; 71 L. Ed. 2d………………………………………………. 22
Constitutional Provisions
U.S. Const. Article VI, Section 2
Supremacy Clause…………………. 2, 7, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. I .1,2, 5, 7, 15,
22, 23, 27, 25
XXIIU.S. Const. Amend. V (Due Process) 2, 3, 14, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. XIII 2
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV (Due Process) 1, 3,
12, 14, 15, 28, 32
i
Statutes, Regulations, and Rules
18 U.S.C. § 873, blackmail, RICO 26
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 26, 33
18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B), domestic terrorism 23
18 U.S.C. § 1503, obstruction of justice 23
18 U.S.C. § 872, extortion 23
18 U.S.C. § 1951, Hobbs Act extortion 5, 23
28 U.S.C. § 1254(1) 1
Americans with Disabilities Act 15
Civil Rights Act of 1964 23
New York State Domestic Relations Law § 236 23
New York State Executive Law No. 157
16, 23
New York State Sessions Law S2942—A
(The Act) 1, 14, 16 23, 27, 28
Texas House Bill 89
27
Violence Against Women Act 22
XXlll
iu e z n oc u z a m
7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, J 60.23 32
Other Authorities
Babylonian Talmud
Tractate Abodah Zarah, Folio 26b
(Law of Moser)………………………….. 11, 15
Tractate Kethuboth, Folio lib 10
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 64a 36
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 745, 108b 7, 24, 16
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 57a 9
Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a 9, 35
Com eandHear
New America, America’s New Government
Church……………………………………………………. 6, 9
Death Penalty and Talmud Law,
Sentence and Execution…………. 6
What About Gentiles
Co-existence:…………. 24
Informing on Fellow Jews Who Commit
Crimes………………………………………………. 11
Sex with Children by Talmud Rules 11
XXIVThe Benediction against the Minim
Lawrence Schiffman……………………. 9, 11
Guide to the Perplexed
Rabbi Moses Maimonides 7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, page 293 Birkat HaMinim
8, 16, 25
8, 16, 25
8
Holy Bible
Genesis 19:1-23
38
Leviticus 20:1
Leviticus 20:1-5
25, 36
25
Leviticus 20:14
25
Numbers 25 38
Judges 19-21
Amos 5:23
39
37
Acts 7:42-43
37
xxv
ui e z n ac u z a m
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere, sole proprietor of Uzamere
Word Processing & More petitions this Court for a writ of
certiorari to review the judgment of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in this matter.
♦
OPINIONS BELOW
The decisions of the court of appeals is printed in
Appendix A (App. A) at 3a-4a. The district court’s opinions
are printed at App. A 5a-12a.
JURISDICTION
The court of appeals entered its judgment on April
10, 2020; this petition is therefore timely filed. This Court
has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1).
CONSTITUTIONAL AND
STATUTORY PROVISIONS
Article I, Section 8, the Commerce Clause of the United
States Constitution provides:
1. To regulate commerce with foreign nations,
and among the several states, and with the
Indian tribes;
2. To constitute tribunals inferior to the
Supreme Court;
1Article VI, Section 2, the Supremacy Clause of the
United States Constitution provides:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United
States…shall be the supreme Law of the
Land…
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law;
The Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
The Judicial power of the United States shall
not be construed to extend to any suit in law or
equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of
the United States by Citizens of another State,
or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,
except as a punishment for crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
2
ui e z n o
ic u 2 a m
within the United States, or any place subject
to their jurisdiction.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution provides:
Section 1: nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.
Statutory Provisions
Civil Law
42JJ.S.C. §19_8_1,.Equal Rights Under the Law:
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United
States shall have the same right in every State
and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to
sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full
and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings
for the security of persons and property as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject
to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes,
licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no
other.
42JLI.S.C.§1983,CivilActionfor_DeprivatiQn_of
Rights
Every person who, under color of any statute,
ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any
State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen
of the United States or other person within the
jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any
3rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the
party injured in an action at law, suit in equity,
or other proper proceeding for redress, except
that in any action brought against a judicial
officer for an act or omission taken in such
officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall
not be granted unless a declaratory decree was
violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
Criminal Law
15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Law:
Every contract, combination in the form of trust
or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade
or commerce among the several states or with
foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every
person who shall make any contract or engage
in any combination or conspiracy hereby
declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of
a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be
punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if
a corporation, or, if any other person
$1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding
10 years, or by both said punishments, in the
discretion of the court.
18 U.S.C. § 1962, Racketeering-Influenced
C or rupt_organiz ation:
It shall be unlawful for any person through a
pattern of racketeering activity or through
collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or
maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in
or control of any enterprise which is engaged in,
or the activities of which affect, interstate or
foreign commerce.
4
ui e 2 n dl
\
\
cuzam
18U.S.C.§1951,Interferencejvith„Commerce
by ThreatsorViolenee
Whoever in any way or degree obstructs,
delays, or affects commerce or the movement of
any article or commodity in commerce, by
robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires to
do so, or commits or threatens physical violence
to any person or property in furtherance of a
plan or purpose to do anything in violation of
this section shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than twenty years, or
both.
18 U.S.C. § 3771, 18 U.S.C. § 10607(c), Crime
Victims’ Rights: A crime victim has the
following rights:
The right to be treated with fairness and with
respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.
¥
INTRODUCTION
“…Let me say first that a constitution, as
important as it is, will mean nothing unless the
people are yearning for liberty and freedom. If
the people don’t care, then the best constitution
in the world won’t make any difference. So, the
spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and
then the constitution
first, it should
safeguard basic fundamental human rights,
like our First Amendment, the right to speak
5freely, and to publish freely, without the
government as a censor.1,2
You should certainly be aided by all the
constitution-writing that has gone one since the
end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S.
constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in
the year 2012.”
Excerpt from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg interview with A1 Hayat TV in Egypt3
On November 5, 2002, nearly ten (10) years prior to
the publicized statement eschewing the U.S. Constitution
as a model for other countries to emulate, the National
Institute for Judaic Law celebrated its founding in the
building housing the U.S. Supreme Court. The gala …was
attended by 200 dinner guests, including justices from this
honorable Court.
Information regarding the gala was publicized by
Come and Hear, at the website entitled New America,
America’
s New Government Church.4
At the Come and Hear website, a chapter entitled
Death Penalty and Talmud Law, Sentence and Execution5
5, says:
I
I1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg;
2 https://www.memri.org/tv/us-supreme-court-justice-ruth-
baderginsburgegyptians-look-constitutions-south-africa-or-canada
3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg&t=3s
4 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html.
5 http://www.come-and-hear.eom/editor/capunish_l.html#n7
1
6
w p z n o1
c u z a in
SupremeCourtConsidersTalmudic Law
“In December 1999, the United States
Supreme Court set a precedent by accepting
for consideration an amicus [curiae] brief in a
death penalty case (Bryan v. Moore)…the brief
was based wholly on Talmud law.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
prohibits the favoring and/or establishment of any religion
in governmental settings. Governmental reliance on
religion, no matter how well-intentioned, is disingenuous
on its face because it violates the Supremacy Clause of the
U.S. Constitution.
The public is unaware of Babylonian Talmudic
dogma that is discriminatory and deadly to people of
African descent, Gentiles, children and especially
whistleblowers:
HatredofPeopleofAfricanDescent6
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio p. 745, 108b: „Our Rabbis taught: …
Ham was smitten in his skin.“ (This is
footnoted, and the footnote reads: „I.e., from
him was descended Cush (the negro), who is
black-skinned.“
Rabbi Moses Maimonides (RamBam), Guide
to the Perplexed: “[T]he Kushites (Negroes)
found in the remote South… rank lower than
the rank of man but higher than the rank of
apes. For they have the external shape and
lineaments of a man and a faculty of
http://_wjv_w_.ottmalLcom/mj_ht_arch/v_15/mj_vl5i20.html#jCDX
7discernment that is superior to that of the
apes.7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim: “the reason Abraham
Lincoln was killed was because he freed the
blacks, this is also the reason why Kennedy
was killed, i.e. because he was good to the
blacks. He continues by saying that this will
be the fate of any who adopt a progressive
attitude towards blacks, because they are
meant to be enslaved.
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
„AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN
(Breishit 9:25): (Commentary omitted) …R.
Huna also said in R. Joseph’s name: You [i.e.
Noah is speaking to Ham) have prevented me
from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed
will be ugly and dark-skinned. R. Chiyya said:
Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark
therefore, Ham came forth black-skinned
while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.“
Hatred of Christians
Birkat HaMinin (Curse against Christians):
…Let the nozerim and the minim be destroyed
in a moment. And let them be blotted out of
the Book of Life and not be inscribed together
with the righteous. Blessed art thou, O Lord,
who humblest the arrogant.“
7 https://www.sefaria.org/Guide_for_the_Perplexed%2C_Part_3.5171an
g=bi
8
ui e z n oc u z a m
Professor Lawrence H. Schiffman: …These
passages present evidence that some version
of the benediction was already recited in the
mid-second century C.E. and that it included
explicit reference to the Christians.8
ComeandHear, New_Ameriea,_America’s_N_ew
GovernmentChurch9
The Noahide Laws promise deadly
consequences for Christians… LORD God
tasked the Jews to enforce the seven Noahide
Commandments, and to enforce them with
liberal use of the death penalty.
EspQusaloftheSlaughterofGentiles
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio 57a: ‚For murder, whether of a Cuthean
by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean,
punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by
an Israelite, there is no death penalty‘?10
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama,
Folio 113a: ‚Where a suit arises between an
Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the
former according to the laws of Israel, justify
him and say: ‚This is our law‘; so also if you
can justify him by the laws of the heathens
justify him and say [to the other party:] ‚This
is your law‘; but if this cannot be done, we use
subterfuges to circumvent him.11
8 http://lawrenceschiffman.com/the-benediction-against-the-minim/
9 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html
10 https://halakhah.com/sanhedrin/_sanhedrin_5_7_.html
11 https://halakhah.com/babakamma/babakamma
113.html
_
9Death Penalty and the Babylonian Talmud12
…Talmud law insists on unequal justice
under law. Talmudic law holds there is one
law for Jews, and one for Gentiles. This is not
inconsistent
with the Old
Testament…Gentiles are the proper slaves of
Jews.
Co-existence?13
What does the future hold? Can the Jews ever
co-exist with the rest of humanity? The
answer is „yes,“ provided the rest of humanity
accepts the role designed for them by Jewish
leadership. If Gentiles do not accept
enslavement, there will be conflict.
The Worship of Molech and Pedophilia
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth,
Folio lib: GEMARA: … When a grown-up
man has intercourse with a little girl it is
nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it
is as if one puts the finger into the eye…»14
12 http://w_w_w_.come-and-hear.com/editor/cap.unish_4.html
13 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/gentile.html
14 https ://halakhah.com/kethuboth/kethuboth_l 1 .html
10
ui e z n dc u z a m
Come and Hear, Sex with Children by Talmud
Rules:15 Again, there is no prohibition of a
sexual practice that would almost certainly
cause physical damage to a young girl due to
the mismatched sizes of genitals between an
adult’s penis and a child’s vagina or anus.
In the Talmud, grown men are permitted to
have sexual intercourse with female babies and
children, and homosexual relations with boys
younger than nine.
Sentence
of Death
for
Christian/Minim,
__
__
__
Apostates and Whistleblowers/Mosrim16
R. Abbahu recited to R. Johanan: ‚Idolaters and
[Jewish] shepherds of small cattle need not be
brought up though they must not be cast in, but
minim, informers, and apostates may be cast
in, and need not be brought up.
Michael J. Broyde, Esq., Co-Directors of National
Institute for Judaic Law’s Inaugural Project17 expounded on
Zarah 26b’s
Abodah prohibition against
whistleblowing/meshira in his speech entitled “Informing on
Fellow Jews Who Commit Crimes18:
… the Talmud recounts – in a number of places
– that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the
secular government, even when their conduct is
a violation of secular law and even when their
conduct is a violation of Jewish law.
15 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
16 The Curse against Christians,
http://lawrenceschifrman.com/thebenediction-againstrthe-minim
17http://nijLorg/contactJitml
18 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/moser-broyde/index.html
11As of the writing of this petition, the petitioner’s
children are victims of sexual violence by respondent New
York State’s foster care system. They have never been
heard, and the petitioner’s attempts to seek justice on
behalf of her children has been successfully rebuffed by
members of the Ashkenazi community’s legal and judicial
community for several decades. The groom-identity-
lacking marriage affidavit containing the fictitious name
“Godwin E. Uzamere” that the petitioner’s husband and his
attorneys submitted to respondent New York State’s
Department of Health, New York City Clerk’s Marriage
License Bureau and the U.S. Department of Justice’s
Immigration and Naturalization Service were criminally
used as an identification document to produce a falsified
marriage license; a falsified birth certificate; a falsified
request for immigration status; and decades of the
petitioner’s receipt of public assistance from respondent New
York State based on its acceptance of the groom-
identification-lacking marriage affidavit that successfully
removed the petitioner’s husband as financial protector from
the then-pregnant petitioner and her children.
Additionally, in spite of the district court’s, the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security’s and the respondent
New York State appellate court’s recognition of
petitioner’s husband as the former Nigerian Senator
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, the respondent New York State’s
Department of Health and its political subdivision New
York City Clerk’s Marriage License Bureau have
vehemently refused to correct their records to reflect
petitioner and her daughter’s rightful marital and
consanguineous
relationship to their African relative,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
Respondent New York State has normalized the
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause’s extension, the Civil Rights Act that prohibits age
discrimination by allowing the ritualized fellating of
12
ui e z n 3c u z a m
helpless Ashkenazi boys during bris, such that in the City
of New York, eleven (11) Ashkenazi baby boys have
contracted herpes, with two (2) of them dying.19 There has
been an upsurge of the killings of unarmed people of
African descent by law enforcement officers across the
country. Although Chinese citizens and the Chabad
Lubavitch were exposed to COVID-19 during the outbreak
in Wuhan, American citizens of African descent are now
listed as being disproportionately affected because of
issues associated with anti-black racism, with the vast
majority of people still not knowing that anti-Hamite/anti-
Canaanite/anti-African hatred is a defamatory religious
teaching associated with the Babylonian Talmud.
This country is now in the grips of the enforcement
of Israel anti-boycott laws. Israel’s prime minister has: 1)
called for the enforcement of the Babylonian Talmud; 2)
threatened U.S. politicians with exposing those who
engaged in sex with children; but, 3) has withheld the
identities of those U.S. politicians Israel’s prime minister
claims had sex with children from the parents, who like
the petitioner, are worried sick about the effects of rape on
their children, and are victims of the intentional infliction of
emotional distress associated with the inability to obtain
justice for their children because of the respondents’
single-minded determination to support Israel’s Ashkenazi-
led government.
As of the completion of this petition, the petitioner
alleges that the respondents have made themselves
unavailable for service by electronic means – as suggested by
this Court. The respondents have refused to comply with
petitioner’s request for return receipt for e-mail sent to them.
https://_ww_w.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmv/rhtml/mm6122a2.htm7.s_cids
mm6122a
13With the assistance of the district and circuit courts,
the petitioner is again forcibly relegated to the position of a
helpless, nonconsenting sex slave to mimic the sexually
sadistic domestic terrorism, sexual harassment, sexual
predation and psychological gang-rape to which the
respondents subjected the petitioner’s children after
facilitating the use of the fictitious name “Godwin E.
Uzamere” to remove the petitioner’s husband as a financial
protector for the petitioner and her children. The petitioner
also alleges that based on a long-term pattern of behavior
associated with members of the Ashkenazi community who
are jurists, there is a disproportionately high percentage of
them who are pedophile-oriented sexually sadistic predators,
who, when adjudicating the lawsuits of unprotected self-
represented litigants, especially in forma pauperis litigants,
create any legal ruse to use their positions of power
psychologically “gang-rape” helpless pro se litigants20.
The petitioner seeks to avail herself of the benefits
of the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy, Freedom of Speech,
Establishment, Religion, Petition, Due Process and Equal
Protection clauses, and to allow the petitioner to present
her request for certiorari with the openness of which the
attendees of the founding of the National Institute for
Judaic Law availed themselves. More importantly, this
petition seeks to connect respondent New York State’s
enforcement of S2942—A, the Israel Anti-Boycott Law to
20 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Sexual Sadism
Disorder
Diagnostic
Criteria
302.84 ’ (F65.52)
(https://mrkmnls.co/2XtKlgi) Over a period of at least 6 months,
recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological
suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or
behaviors…The diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are
intended to apply both to individuals who freely admit to having such
paraphilic interests and to those who deny any sexual interest in the
physical or psychological suffering of another individual despite
substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
14
ui e z n oc u z a m
the unconstitutional enforcement
Talmud’s Law of Moser.
of the Babylonian
To that end, the petitioner has, in addition to
availing herself of her First Amendment right to petition
the government for a redress of grievances, has further
exercised her First Amendment right to free speech by
informing the members of the European Union and the
African Union of the existence of this petition before filing
it with this honorable Court, as well as members of the
international Hamitic/Canaanite/African community, to
expose the havoc that the continued interference of the
Babylonian Talmud has wrought, and in particular, the
havoc that children of Hamitic/Canaanite/African descent
have suffered, who petitioner alleges like her son, were
gang-raped as a result of the enforcement of the
Babylonian Talmudic Law of Moser, which the petitioner
alleges has now been politicized into the New York State
Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Cheryl D. Uzamere, the petitioner, is a member of
several groups that are protected by federal statutes that
invoke the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause. She is an African American. She is a woman. She
is one of Jehovah’s Witnesses and a servant of the true god,
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ; and hater of Molech, the god of pedophilia, sexual
pervasion associated with pedophilia and child sacrifice.
She was diagnosed as having bipolar disorder, an organic
mental condition in February 1993, that is recognized as a
disability pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act,
and for which she has received Social Security Disability
Insurance retroactively since 1996. She is the mother of
David Paul Walker and Tara Ann Uzamere, African
American children who are victims of sexually sadistic
15terrorism by respondents New York State and New York
City’s Babylonian Talmud-based foster care system, and
who were kidnapped and trafficked by respondent State of
New York and City of New York for purposes of the
Babylonian Talmud/Molech-fomented trafficking of
humans for the sex trade and kidnapping and trafficking
of boys of African descent for anal sodomy. She is an
individual against whom the extrajudicial sentence of
death has been ordered pursuant to the Babylonian
Talmudic crime of meshira/mesira (whistleblowing), a
religious law that is now politicized and legalized by New
York State Executive Order No. 157 and the New York
State Legislative Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A
regarding boycotting Israel.
Based on those matters in which she was personally
involved, and on information and belief as to all other
matters, she makes the following statements under
penalty of perjury.
Statement of Petitioner’s Son, David Paul Walker’s
Sexual Abuse While a Client at JCCA-Edenwald Group
Home
The petitioner became aware of the incident
described below sometime during 2018. The petitioner’s
son, David Paul Walker described an occasion where, while
he was six years old, he was in a setting where the
employees of JCCA-Edenwald did not supervise the
sleeping area, nor provide security cameras or security
guards to ensure that her son’s or other foster children
were safe, in what she alleges was an attempt to hide their
goals of allowing Babylonian Talmud-adherent, sex-crazed
members of the Ashkenazi Jewish community to engage in
the Babylonian Talmudic practice of anally sodomizing the
petitioner’s son:
16
ui e z n Dc u z a m
“Please Mr. Don’t touch me there, I’m only
six…love you not, hate you a lot, Shall we
commence to crucifix???… When I was a little
boy, teenage boy masturbated in front of me,
then politely ask me to lick???… “If you come
near me, I’ll scream”
, First time seeing
someone else’s dick… So easy to pass
judgment, tell everybody else what to do…Say
stranger, my advice but your ass, shall we
suffer together for a spell or two??? Disturbed
by the vacant lifeless expression in my eyes
yes
??? of
Systematic
rape my
soul…prolonged torture of my mind, please
my darling. I wholeheartedly invite you to try
your best…
Statement of Petitioner’s Daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere
That Was Ignored By New York State Supreme Court
Justice Jeffrey S. Sunshine:
The petitioner’s daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere, now a
registered nurse with the State of New York for over 10
years, submitted a New York State-notarized affidavit in
which she described Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, at that time a
senator for the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as her father:
I, Tara A. Uzamere, being duly sworn,
depose and say that:
1) I am the daughter of the Plaintiff
and the Defendant in the above-entitled action.
2) following facts:
I make this Affidavit based on the
3) That the Plaintiff has always told
me that Defendant is my father ever since I was
a child.
174) That I met the Defendant for the first
time at JFK Airport in Jamaica, New York
around the year 2004 to the best of my
recollection.
5)
That I took a photograph of the
Defendant during the aforesaid visit.
Photograph taken at JFK Airport is hereby
attached as Exhibit A.
6) That on the day that I first met the
Defendant at JFK Airport, I called my friend
Eusi Patterson on the cell phone that I used to
take a photograph of the Defendant.
7)
That on the aforesaid day the
Defendant openly and notoriously introduced
himself to Eusi as my father.
8) That I met and visited the
Defendant’s late brother, John Uzamere at 476
Amboy Street.
9) That the Defendant and his
brother George Uzamere openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at 489 Ray
Street, Freeport, New York.
10)
That while I was a resident in
Freeport, New York, I experienced a car
accident, and that George Uzamere and the
Defendant openly and notoriously sent checks
to pay the rest of my car note to Drive
Financial, a financing company based in
Dallas, Texas.
18
uiezn:c u z a m
11) That the Defendant openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at Nichol
Road in Wyandanch, New York.
12) That the Defendant met my
landlord, Martin Marta when the Defendant
visited me while I was living at the aforesaid
address.
13) That during the aforesaid meeting
the Defendant openly and notoriously
identified himself to my landlord as my father.
14) That I spoke with Wellington
Uzamere on the telephone several times before
and after I first met the Defendant.
15) That Wellington Uzamere
referred to the Defendant as „Ehigie.“
16) That based on information
received from members of the Edo/Bini
community as well as my own belief, my facial
structure resembles that of the Defendant as
evidenced in my photograph hereby attached as
Exhibit B.
17) That while I spend three or four
pleasant occasions with the Defendant and
received monetary gifts during those occasions,
the Defendant has never been a consistent part
of my life as I explained in the report [that] I
provided to Nigerian newspaper Huhu Online.
See aforesaid report hereby attached as Exhibit
C.
1918) That based on what I learned at
Long Island College School of Nursing
regarding psychiatric nursing and psychiatric
illnesses, as well as personal day-to-day
observation of the Plaintiff, that while the
Plaintiffs predominate affect is consistent with
what I believe to be hypomania, the Plaintiff is
not psychotic and does not require
hospitalization, as untruthfully implied by
Eugene
Uzamere’s defamatory
characterization of the Plaintiff as „certifiably
insane“ to Nigerian newspaper Point Blank
News Online, hereby attached as Exhibit D.
19) That before 2004 the Defendant
never visited me; never celebrated a birthday
with me; never kissed me; never told me he
loved me; never wiped away my tears; never
talked to me about God; never attended a house
of God with me; never read me a Bible story;
never talked to me about how to comport myself
around men or the importance of being a chaste
woman; never let other men know that I was
precious to him; never let other men know that
they would be responsible to him if they hurt
me; never held my hand; never walked with me;
never sat me on his lap; never played games
with me; never took me to the movies; never
picked me up; never gave me a hug; never
attended a school meeting with my teachers;
never visited me in the hospital; never told me
he was proud of me; never accompanied me to a
father/daughter dance, never attended a
graduation; never invited other members of the
Edo/Bini community to a naming ceremony in
honor of my birth; never told me that he was
glad I was born and never treated me like he
loved me and wanted to protect me from the
20
ui e 2 n ocuzam
dangers of the world the way normal fathers do
with their daughters, and especially in the
manner that Nigerian men are known to treat
their children.
20) That the falsely concocted
„counter-affidavit“ and the falsely concocted
affirmation by Eugene Uzamere makes me
feel heartsick because I have always been
made to believe by the Plaintiff, the
Defendant and members of the Defendant’s
family that the Defendant is my father and
that being a blood member of the Uzamere
clan, a blood member of the proud and ancient
Edo/Bini nation and culture and being a
native Nigerian based on consanguinity are
my birthrights and a part of who I am; that the
aforesaid „counter-affidavit and attorney’s
affirmation are emotionally and psychologically
abusive as they suggest that I am a bastard
child while the Defendant is not willing to end
the question of paternity by taking a simple
DNA test.
21) That I now experience financial
difficulties such that I do not have money to
return to college to continue studying nursing,
and that because of the Plaintiffs advanced age
and disability, it is very difficult for her to
obtain employment to help me pay for college;
PELL grant rejection information is attached at
Exhibit E.
22) That I am willing to submit myself
for honest DNA testing to confirm that the
Defendant is my father if conditions can be
controlled so that the Defendant does not know
and cannot access the location of the laboratory
21where said DNA test is performed so that the
Defendant does not unduly influence anyone to
lie about the results of the DNA test as it seems
the Defendant was able to do on the marriage
affidavit where the municipal clerk signed
his/her name to indicate that he/she verified
the Defendant’s age, but that on inspection of
said page, did not mark off any box to indicate
the type of identification the municipal clerk
used to verify the Defendant’s age and date of
birth and identity; see Plaintiffs Affidavit and
Application for License to Marry, top of back
page hereby attached as Exhibit F.
Wherefore, as the Defendant has forced
the Plaintiff and I to suffer domestic violence as
identified by the U.S. Justice Department’s
Office of Violence Against Women, I
respectfully ask that this Court considers that
the Plaintiff is not just pleading for herself but
for our entire family; that this Court grant the
Plaintiffs lawful and just request to dismiss
attorney
Eugene Uzamere’s falsified
affirmation in its entirety, and to grant the
Plaintiffs motion for default judgment and
money judgment in its entirety.
The basis of the petitioner’s request for a writ of
certiorari by this Court is the lower courts’ refusal of her
request for declaratory and injunctive relief. The
petitioner asked the lower courts for two things: 1) the
right to speak; and 2) for the lower court to prevent the
respondents from violating the petitioner’s First
Amendment right to speak. The response of both the
district court and the circuit court were “Plaintiff, we will
not allow you to speak about issues regarding the gang-
rape of your children, the falsified marriage-affidavit or
other issues contained in the 540 exhibits of your lawsuit.”
22
ui e z n oc u z a m
The petitioner requested the lower courts to grant
her First Amendment right to speak in court about, among
other things, the rape of her children. The Second Circuit,
a Sherman-Antitrust-violating, white supremacist,
Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi-led judicial
cartel where every U.S. attorney that received the
petitioner’s complaints are members of the Ashkenazim,
has consistently demonstrated to the petitioner that black
lives do not matter. The lower courts’ judiciary know that
with a disproportionate percentage of the Second Circuit’s
judiciary being members of a religion that teaches that
people of African descent are meant to be enslaved, that
the petitioner’s chances of being granted certiorari are
slim to none.
Pursuant to a recently enacted law, New York State
Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A, (“2942–A” or “the
Act”), the State of New York requires government
contractors to certify that they are not engaged in boycotts
of Israel or territories controlled by Israel.
The petitioner is the sole proprietor of a home-based
typing service. Over the course of several decades, the
respondents have sought to extort, defraud, and otherwise
torturously injure the petitioner by means of a plan they
conceived and executed against the petitioner and her
children. It has been continuously carried out a
racketeering-influenced criminal organization led by
members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi
leadership in positions of great power, among others,
immigration attorneys, Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro,
New York State Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey S.
Sunshine and other New York State Supreme Court
justices/judges, federal and municipal law enforcement
officers, Affinity Federal Credit Union; Metavante
Corporation; Verizon, Inc.; the New York City Housing
Authority; New York City Comptroller’s Office’s 50-H
23attorney Jane Barrett; New York City Department of
Information Technology and Telecommunication; the City
University of New York; the New York City Police
Department; Web.com; the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission; the Social Security
Administration; the New York State Attorney General’s
Office; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; New York
City Health and Hospitals Corporation; New York State
Office of Mental Health, Brookdale Hospital Medical
Center, Interfaith Medical Center; the National Credit
Union Administration, America Works, Inc.; Brooklyn
Defender, Inc.; Federal Defenders of Brooklyn; Federation
Employment and Guidance Services (FEGS); and other
governmental and nongovernmental employees under the
control of respondent New York State’s powerful
Ashkenazi leadership for whom the petitioner provided the
circuit court with irrefutable proof of embezzlement of the
petitioner’s SSDI funds; malicious prosecution; unlawful
imprisonment; medical malpractice; but against whom
respondent New York State and its subdivision New York
City have done nothing.
The petitioner alleges that the Act superficially
seeks to suppress participation in political boycott
campaigns aimed at Israel and/or territories controlled by
Israel, particularly Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions
(“BDS”) campaigns. These campaigns seek to apply
economic pressure on Israel to protest the Israeli
government’s treatment of Palestinians and occupation of
the Palestinian territories.
The petitioner alleges that the real purpose of the
Act is to facilitate what the Israeli scientific and public
health sectors, the Israel movie entitled Conventional Sins
and CBS Channel 2 News identify as a disproportionately
high percentage of Ashkenazi Jews who have a
predisposition for pedophilia, and to use the Babylonian
Talmud’s misinterpretation regarding the Holy Bible’s
24
Ui G Z n 0c u 7. a ra
identity of Ham and his son Canaanite as the religious
excuse to subject them to international sexualized
enslavement and tyranny the Jehovah God and the U.S.
Constitution forbid. The petitioner alleges that, based on
historical records: a) from the completion of the writing of
the Babylonian Talmud; b) to the Babylonian Talmud’s
promulgation of the inferiority of people of African descent;
c) to Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership’s monopolization of the African slave trade
where Africans, including their children were anally
sodomized; d) to Ashkenazi Jew-controlled Israel’s murder
of over 100,000 Arab-Jewish and Palestinian children
during the Ringworm Experiment; e) to Israel’s Knesset’s
acknowledgment of the Ashkenazi Jew-controlled
kidnapping, torturous experimentation and murder of
thousands of Yemeni Jewish children; f) to the Franklin
Scandal where children, predominately European boys
were removed from foster homes to be anally raped; g) to
the disproportionately high percentage of Ashkenazi
Jewish children who are fellated after circumcision, some
of who contracted herpes and died; h) to Jeffrey Epstein’s
numerous international forays for the purpose of raping
European American children; i) to New York State’s
warehousing of boys of African descent in distantly located
group homes where boys like my son, David Paul Walker
are anally sodomized; j) to Electric Intifada’s description
of Ashkenazi Jew-controlled weaponized rape of
Palestinians; k) to New York State’s immigration policy
that disproportionately admits individuals from South
Asia and the Middle East, parts of the world where the
institutionalized prostitution of children has been
normalized; 1) to Israel’s citizenry’s desperate attempts to
stop the flow of Ashkenazi Jewish pedophiles from using
Aliyah to escape prosecution in countries where they have
raped children, just to escape to Israel to rape children
there; the respondents have exhibited, not just a glaring
refusal to protect children, but an even more glaring
ability to create impoverished children who are trafficked
25and anally raped in its foster care system. The, petitioner
alleges that the respondents’ leaders are violent,
pedophilic sodomites, and that the BDS issue is a cover to
deflect attention from Ashkenazi Jewish’ leadership’s
organic predisposition for pedophilia.
Not only does the petitioner allege that respondent
New York State’s Anti-Boycott law is a cover for the
Ashkenazi community’s organic predisposition with
pedophilia and sexual sadism, the petitioner alleges that
the enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott law is a
violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Act; 18
U.S.C. § 1961-1968 regarding obstruction, domestic
terrorism and Hobbs Act extortion; a violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 873 regarding blackmail; and is as much an act of
sexually sadistic domestic terrorism and psychological
torture as is Israel’s prime minister’s act of sexualized,
blackmail/psychological torture regarding his threat to
expose U.S. politicians who are pedophiles21 relating to the
fate of the missing Yemenite children of the 1950s22, while
intentionally inflicting emotional distress on the parents
of the children who Israel’s prime minister claims were
raped by withholding the names of those U.S. politicians
Israel’s prime minister claims raped children. –
21 Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile Ring —
Chinese https://bit.ly/3hHE0_Cy_.
22 Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies Murdered in Medical
Experiments, https://bit.ly/2ZwEitY.
26
uieznsi
c u z a m
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION
I. New York State Sessions Law S2942—A is
U nconstitutional.
a) Other Federal Courts Have Found that
the Israel Anti-Boycott Law is
U nconstitutional
In an article entitled Third Federal Court Rules
Anti-BDS Law Violates First Amendment3, the website
TheFire.org stated:
Last week, a federal court in Austin,
Texas issued an order blocking enforcement of
a state law dubbed Texas’ “anti-BDS bill” by
the governor. Texas House Bill 89, enacted in
2017, required government contractors to
certify that they do not and would not boycott
Israel while doing business with a state
entity.
The
order in Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District granted the
preliminary injunction motions of five sole
proprietors in two consolidated lawsuits filed
in late 2018 by the ACLU and the Council on
American-Islamic Relations.
Last year, federal district courts in Kansas24 and
Arizona25 sustained First Amendment challenges and
issued injunctions against enforcement of the state laws.
23 Third federal court rules anti-BDS law violates First Amendment,
https://bit.ly/3hQ9MBS.
24 Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp.3d 1007 (2018)
25 Jordahl, et al v. Brnovich, et al, 18-16896
27b) Respondent New York State’s Sessions Law
S2942—A Violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
the Hobbs Act.
The petitioner alleges that enforcement of New York
State’s Israel Anti-Boycott law sets the stage for its own
undoing because it violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
RICO law regarding the Hobbs Act.
The News Punch website published an article entitled
Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile
Ring, the article states:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
just declassified 400,000 documents that
expose child trafficking and a child sex ring
in Washington.
Per se violations of the Sherman Antitrust law do not
allow justifications. Conversely, while per se acts cannot be
defended or justified, there are limited exceptions where
courts will instead apply the rule of reason.26 For example,
in Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 363 F 3d.
761 (8th Cir. 2004), the Eighth Circuit held that an
agreement between Ford and a trade association of
limousine converters to prevent the plaintiff from
advertising its products in the trade association publications
was motivated by safety concerns. Thus, the court applied
the rule of reason even though this was a (non-price)
horizontal conspiracy among competitors.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on It
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
26 BonaLaw PC – Does the Group Boycott Violate Antitrust Laws
https://bit.ly/2Nop6aN
28
ui e z n oc u z a m
The website The Chronicle for Social Change
published an article dated February 27, 2019 entitled New
York City Confronts Massive Overrepresentation of Black
Children in Foster Care. The article states:
… the foster care system is expanding its efforts
to address longstanding disparities, especially
for black children whose presence in the system
is roughly double their share of the general
population.
…It’s part of ACS’ recent focus on “lifting the
value of racial disproportionality to the value of
safety and risk within our system,” says David
Peters, ACS’ head of the Office of Equity
Strategies (OES). That focus was prompted in
part by a legislative package De Blasio
signed in September of 2017, which mandated
training on implicit bias, discrimination and
structural inequity at city agencies.
…Fifty-three percent of the roughly 9,000
children in the city foster care system identified
as black in 2017, according to state data. Yet,
only around a quarter of all New Yorkers
younger than 18 are black.
The petitioner alleges that the implicit bias against
black children is directly related to the Babylonian Talmud’s
explicit dissemination of anti-black hatred, its espousal of
pedophilia and the Ashkenazi community’s organic
predisposition for pedophilia; however Babylonian Talmud-
adherent, Ashkenazi leadership has been as silent on these
religious doctrines just as nearly all other members of the
Ashkenazi community have done.
– 29d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
et al.
The lawsuit entitled Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et al,
makes the following statements:
For most Americans, the concepts relied upon
by the Palestinian Plaintiffs in this case (i.e.
ethnic cleansing, genocide, denationalization,
and dehumanization) are foreign concepts not
part of normal American vernacular. However,
these concepts are as American as apple pie.
The indigenous American Indian population
and the African slaves brought to America have
been victimized by these identical war crimes.
Each group has been subject to ethnic
cleansing, genocide, expropriation of private
property, confinement to reservations and
ghettos, wholesale denial of their fundamental
freedoms, subjected to a biased criminal justice
system, and deemed to be irrelevant and
disenfranchised members of American society.
Like Palestinian-Americans these groups can
file their own war crime lawsuits here in federal
district court. The reasons: (a) the similarity of
injuries sustained (wanton destruction of
property, starvation diets, and poisoning of
water wells and livestock); (b) the identical
means employed to subjugate these groups
(The New York Police Department murdered
Amadou Diallo with 51 bullets and Mr. Shapira
used 87 bullets to massacre 29 Palestinians);
30
iii e 2 n oc u z a m
/
and (c) for over 400 years, they have been
victims of an ethnic cleansing/genocidal
campaign similar to the one started by
Defendant PMN in 1998. See U.S. State
Department Manual on the 10 Stages of
Genocide, Exhibit B.
With respect to the role that Defendant Cuomo
played in terms of denationalization, he has not
directly funded international terrorists.
However, along with his hero, Defendant
Hikind, he has deprived 195 million Americans
in thirty-six different states of the right to
support the Palestinian cause and criticize
PMN’s campaign to denationalize the
Palestinian population…On behalf of the
Israeli government, not his New York state
constituency (which rejected the anti-BDS
legislation), Defendant Cuomo convinced forty
governors to enact an unconstitutional
executive order criminalizing the anti-Boycott,
Divestiture, and Sanction movement
[hereinafter BDS].
The New York State anti-BDS legislation
violated fundamental liberties cherished by
Americans, e.g. their right to criticize a foreign
country’s human rights record. That legislation
requires US. citizens to sign what amounts to
loyalty oaths to Israel. It has had a serious
chilling effect on freedom of speech and interstate
commerce (italics added). The Israeli
spokespersons in charge of this program and
tasked with convincing their fellow Americans
that Palestinians are “savages” not deserving of
their own state are Defendants Cuomo and
Hikind, even though they are not registered as
Israeli agents under the Federal Agent
31Registration Act 22 U.S.C. 611 (hereinafter
FARA).
II.
The Circuit Court’s and District Court’s Decision
is in Direct Contravention of Its Own Mandate
concerning Court Corruption that was
established in Chevron v. Donziger.
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121
(10th Cir. 1985), the court stated „Fraud upon the court is
fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and
is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents,
false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a
member is corrupted or influenced or influence is
attempted or where the judge has not performed his
judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of
the court have been directly corrupted.”
“Fraud upon the court“ has been defined by the 7th
Circuit Court of Appeals to „embrace that species of fraud
which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a
fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the
judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its
impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for
adjudication.“ Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7
Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ‘I 60.23. The 7th
Circuit further stated: „a decision produced by fraud upon
the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never
becomes final.“
Fraud upon the court violates the Supremacy Clause
of the U.S. Constitution because it violates the Fifth
Amendment’s Due Process Clause. The petitioner further
holds that when judges are involved in acts of fraud upon
the court related to a particular issue, and/or similar
issues that are related to a specific litigant or specific
groups of litigants, especially in relation to issues
regarding the commission of federal law, those acts
32
ui ez nsc u z a m
constitute violation of 18 USC § 1961-1968, RICO laws,
especially as they pertain to the second circuit’s
enforcement of Chevron v. Donziger.
On August 8, 2016, the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court rendered
in the case Chevron v. Donziger, et al (See 974 F.Supp.2d
362 (2014)).
The district court found that defendants Steven
Donziger and his law firm engaged in RICO-predicate acts
under
the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 that resulted in
a corrupt judgment by a Ecuadorian court, and that
because the defendants’ acts led to the Ecuadorian court’s
corrupt decision, the judgment was unenforceable in
federal court under federal law and under New York
common law.
Liberally sprinkled throughout the circuit court’s
decision are the terms “obstruction of justice (pages 96, 97,
98), and “procured by fraud” (pages 70, 109, 111, 112).
The Second Circuit’s decision in Chevron v.
Donziger, et al, in affirming the district court’s decision,
held that the defendants: 1) submitted fraudulent
evidence, 2) told “half-truths…to U.S. courts in attempts
to prevent exposure of other wrongdoing.”
In the petitioner’s case, the district court’s decision
named petitioner’s prior lawsuits: 1) Uzamere v. Allen E.
Kaye, P.C; 2) Uzamere v. Cuomo; 3) Uzamere v. Rice; and
4) Uzamere v. United States.
The district court’s decision stated that:
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action
arising from her 1979 marriage to and
33subsequent abandonment by her husband,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere… Plaintiff submits to
the Court a 205-page complaint with 540
pages of exhibits.
The petitioner cannot understand how the district
court was honestly able to count the 540 pages of exhibits,
while missing the first exhibit: respondent New York State
Department of Health’s/New York City Clerk’s marriage
affidavit that bore the petitioner/bride’s legal name and
proof of identity but failed to provide petitioner’s
husband/groom’s legal name and accompanying proof of
identity.
The district court also removed 79 of 90 defendants
from the petitioner’s case without explanation, and later
withdrew its own decision granting IFP status after the
petitioner filed her complaint regarding the district court’s
unexplained removal of 79 defendants from her lawsuit
(see Appendix C).
Based on the Second Circuit’s enforcement of RICO
laws regarding court corruption in the case Chevron v.
Donziger, the petitioner believes that she has justiciable
issues regarding the district court’s RICO-predicate acts
based on the district court’s and respondent New York
State’s courts’ acts of obstruction of justice regarding
respondent New York State’s facilitation of her husband’s
and his immigration attorneys’ acts of immigration fraud,
identity fraud, and the removal of the petitioner’s husband
as
financial protector to facilitate the sexual violence
committed against the petitioner’s children while they
were clients of respondent New York State’s foster care
system.
34
ui e 2 n o
:c u z a m
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment Right to
advise this Court of Jehovah’s Viewpoint
The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public
Affairs submitted its amicus brief to present Babylonian
Law as humane. However, the amicus brief submitted by
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s in the case Bryan v. Moore was
deceptive.27 The amicus brief cites references that are
unchallengeable to the Babylonian Talmud-ignorant
public who do not know or do not have access to the
Babylonian Talmud. To those who have knowledge of the
Babylonian Talmud, or who like the petitioner, have
downloaded the Babylonian Talmud in its entirety can see
that the cited references were not relevant in Mr. Bryan’s
case. Even worse, COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s capitalizing of Mr.
Bryan’s unfortunate situation was a shameless attempt at
self-aggrandizement and aggrandizement of Babylonian
Talmudic law and Ashkenazi Jewish culture. The brief
itself makes the statement:
COLPA and IAJLJ are vitally interested in
promoting the study of, and respect for,
principles of Jewish Law as they have been
applied throughout the history of the Jewish
people. COLPA and the national groups that
it routinely represents promote and
encourage in-depth study of Talmudic texts.
IAJLJ has sponsored public lectures in
Jewish Law and promoted the publication of
scholarly essays in the field of Jewish Law.
27 “…Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a
(https://halakhah.com/pdfynezikin/Baba_Kama.pdf): Where a suit arises
between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former
according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: ‘This is our law’; so
also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and
say [to the other party:] ‘This is your law’; but if this cannot be done, we
use subterfuges to circumvent him.
35While COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s attorneys cited, but did
not quote Leviticus 20 regarding the use of fire to punish
men who have sexual relations with their mothers-in law
along with their wives, they failed to mention what
Jehovah’s word says in the verses above regarding
Jehovah’s condemnation of the worship of Molech:
Leviticus 20:14: And if a man [take] with his
wife also her mother, it is wickedness: they
shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that
there be no wickedness among you.
Leviticus 20:1-5:And Jehovah spoke unto
Moses, saying: Moreover, thou shalt say to
the children of Israel: Whosoever he be of the
children of Israel, or of the strangers that
sojourn in Israel, that giveth of his seed unto
Molech; he shall surely be put to death; the
people of the land shall stone him with stones.
I also will set My face against that man, and
will cut him off from among his people,
because he hath given of his seed unto
Molech, to defile My sanctuary, and to profane
My holy name.
And if the people of the land do at all hide
their eyes from that man, when he giveth of
his seed unto Molech, and put him not to
death…
Another glaring omission that attorneys for
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s made regarding the Babylonian
Talmud’s pretense at humanity is stated earlier in this
petition in Tractate Sanhedrin 64a:
36
uiEznsc u 2 a m
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Jehovah’s word the Bible has long identified the
nation of Israel as worshippers of Molech. Ancient history
identifies Molech as the god of pedophilia and child
sacrifice.
Jehovah’s Prophet Amos, as well as the Apostle
Stephen says the following regarding Israel’s worship of
Molech:
Amos 5:23: “Did ye bring unto Me sacrifices
and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O
house of Israel? So shall ye take up Siccuth
your king and Chiun your images, the star of
your god, which ye made to yourselves.
Therefore, will I cause you to go into captivity
beyond Damascus, saith He, whose name is
Jehovah God of hosts.”
Acts 7:42-43: “…just as it is written in the
book of the Prophets: ‘It was not to me that
you made offerings and sacrifices for 40 years
in the wilderness, was it, O house of
Israel? But it was the tent of Mo loch and the
star of the god Re phan that you took up, the
images that you made to worship them. So, I
will deport you beyond Babylon.”
In 2012, the University of Ben Gurion in the Negev
submitted a report to the U.S. National Institutes of
Health entitled History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties
37in a Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra – orthodox Males with
Pedophilia based on the Ashkenazi Jewish community’s
problem with pedophilia as a public health concern. It
says:
Results: … 82.6% of participants were victims
of sexual trauma as children and 87% suffer
from some kind of organic vulnerability
(learning disabilities, disinhibitions, etc.).
Limitations: Limitations of this small
convenience sample that influence ability to
generalize are discussed.
Conclusions: The current survey indicates
that in this sample, the ultra-orthodox male
pedophile was frequently a victim of
childhood sexual trauma and exhibited
indications of organic vulnerabilities. This is
more pronounced than findings in previous
studies and calls for further research in order
to understand the underlying causes.
Sexual abuse in the ultra-orthodox
community is a serious and under-researched
phenomenon. …
Lastly, the petitioner makes the following
observations as a respectful reminder that there is a Power
that transcends the power of this Court, and that the
petitioner is obedient to that Power. That Power is
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ.
In the Bible there are examples that show Jehovah’s
condemnation of gang rape, group sexual depravity and
child sacrifice. Genesis 19:1-23 (Sodom and Gomorrah);
Numbers 25 (Israel’s being lured into worship of Baal-Peor
38
ui e z n dcuzam
to engage in group sex); Judges 19-21 (gang rape and
murder of a Levite’s concubine. These acts are consistent
with individuals who are worshippers of Molech, practices
that the Babylonian Talmud allows, but Jehovah Himself
and the U.S. Constitution forbid.
Jehovah’s told the Prophet Moses to warn Israel,
and by extension, the rest of the world about His hatred
for Molech worshippers in Leviticus 20:1: Any man of
Israel and any foreigner …who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail.
CONCLUSION
The Petition for a writ of certiorari should be
granted.
Respectfully submitted,
CHERYL D. UZAMERJE
Sole Proprietor 1/
Uzamere Word Processing More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
chexyl.uzamere_@juzamerewordpr
QC.essing.net
39
c u z a m
Supreme Court, U.S.
FILED
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
No.
?o-M
•Bn W&t
Supreme Court pt tfie 3Hmteb States?
CHERYL D. UZAMERE AS SOLE PROPRIETOR OF
UZAMERE WORD PROCESSING & MORE
Petitioner,
v.
THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
Respondents.
On Petition For A Writ of Certiorari
To The United States Court of Appeals
For the Second Circuit
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Appearing Pro Se
Uzamere Word Processing
& More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
cheryl .uzamere @uzamere
w_Qrdpr_QC.essing.net RECEIVED
AUG 1 3 2020
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
SUPREME COURT, II RQUESTIONS PRESENTED
The questions presented are:
1.
unconstitutional:
Whether New York State Law S2942—A is
a) Federal Courts find that New York State Law
S2942—A is unconstitutional.
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates the
Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs Act.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on Its
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et
al.
2.
Whether the circuit court’s and district court’s
decisions are in contravention of the Second Circuit’s
mandate concerning court corruption that was established in
Chevron v. Donziger.
3.
Whether the petitioner has the First
Amendment right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
viewpoint regarding the Babylonian Talmud’s espousal of
the worship of the god Molech, the god of pedophilia.
i
ui e z n oc u z a m
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner
Cheryl D. Uzamere, Individually and as Sole Proprietor
of Uzamere Word Processing & More
Respondents
New York State The Honorable
Pamela L. Fisher
The Honorable
Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor
New York State
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Letitia James
Attorney General
New York State
The Honorable
Janet Difiore
Chief Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Robin S. Garson
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Bernard J. Graham
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
nThe Honorable
Lawrence K. Marks
Chief Administrative Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lara J. Genovesi
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lawrence Knipel
Administrative Judge
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Dawn Jimenez-Salta
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
The Honorable
Jeffrey Sunshine Matrimonial Kathy J. King
Practice Advisory and Rules Justice of the
Committee, Statewide
Kings County
Coordinating Judge for
Supreme Court
Matrimonial Cases
New York State
New York State
Unified Court System
Unified Court System
Susan Kaufman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Donald Kurtz
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
m
ui e z n oThe Honorable
Betty Weinberg Ellerin
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Sondra Miller
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jacqueline Silbermann
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Alton Abramowitz, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
IV
c u 2 a m
The Honorable
Carl Landicino
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Katherine A. Levine
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Richard J. Montelione
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lisa S. Ottley
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemSusan L. Bender, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Roseann Branda, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Andrew Crecca
Justice of the Supreme Court,
Suffolk County Supervising
Judge of Matrimonial Matters
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Kathleen Donelli, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
v
uezn:
The Honorable
Mark Partnow
Justice of the
Kings County .
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michael Pesce
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Eric Prus
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Karen B. Rothenberg
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court Systemc u z a m
The Honorable
The Honorable
Laura A. Drager
Leon Ruchelsman
Acting Justice of the Supreme Justice of the
Court New York County,
Kings County Supreme
Matrimonial Practice
Court
Advisory and Rules
New York State
Committee
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
Donna England, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Stephen J. Gassman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen Gesmer
Associate Justice
Appellate Division for the
First Department
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wayne P. Saitta
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Kenneth Sherman
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Debra Silber
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
viThe Honorable
Cheryl A. Joseph
Acting Supreme Court Justice
Supreme Court, Suffolk
County, Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Elena Karabatos, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jeffrey D. Lebowitz
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Christopher S. Mattingly Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Vll
meznj
The Honorable
Martin Solomon
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen M. Spodek
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court for The New
York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable Marsha
L. Steinhardt Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Peter P. Sweeney
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemMichael A. Mosberg Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Hemalee J. Patel, Esq.,
Referee of the Supreme Court
Richmond County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Florence Richardson Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Yesenia Rivera, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
vm
c u z a m
The Honorable Delores
J. Thomas Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wavny Toussaint
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
David B. Vaughan
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Richard
Velasquez Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemThe Honorable
Emily Ruben
Family Court Judge
Queens County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Sharon Kelly Sayers, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Carolyn
E. Wade Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Zenith T. Taylor, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Eric A. Tepper, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Edgar G. Walker
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michelle Weston
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Paul Wooten
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
IX
uezn:c u 2 a m
Bruce J. Wagner, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Michael McSweeney
New York City Clerk
of the Council
Harriet Weinberger, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Patrick L. Synmoie
Executive Agency
Counsel
New York City
Clerk’s Office
The Honorable
Howard A. Zucker
Hope Zimmerman Justice of M.D., J.D.,
the Supreme Court, Nassau Commissioner
County Matrimonial Practice New York State
Advisory and Rules
Department of Health
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Rachel A. Adams
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Richard Zahnleuter
General Counsel
New York State
Department of Health
xThe Honorable
Sylvia G. Ash
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Loren Baily-Schiffman
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Johnny Lee Baynes
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Reginald A. Boddie
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Andrew M. Saul
Commissioner
Social Security
Administration
Royce B. Min
General Counsel
Social Security
Administration
Monica Chyn
Social Security
Admini stration
Gail Ennis ■
Inspector General
Social Security
Administration
xi
uisznsThe Honorable
Theresa Ciccotto
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Lissette Colon
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Matthew
D’Emic Justice of the
Kings County Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Jeanine Edwards
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Xll
cuzam
Ellen Sovern
Regional General
Counsel, Regional II
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe7“Jane Doe,
Office Manager, Social
Security District Office
3386 Crescent Street,
Brooklyn, New York,
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe”/“Jane Doe,
Office Manager
Social Security
District Office
Social Security
Administration
“Jane Doe”
, a.k.a. “Ms.
Flores, Pass Cadre
Worker, Supervisor,
Social Security District
Office
Social Security
Administrationc u z a m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS xiv
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES xxi
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1
OPINIONS BELOW 1
JURISDICTION 1
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
PROVISIONS……………………………………… 1
INTRODUCTION 5
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 15
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION 27
I. New York State Law
Unconstitutional:……………..
S2942—A is
27
a) Federal Courts find that New York State
Law S2942—A is unconstitutional…………. 27
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates
the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs
Act 28
xivi
c) New York State Abrogated the
Fourteenth Amendment Regarding Age
and Race Based on Its Enforcement of the
Israel Anti-Boycott Law……………………….. 28
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of
Genocide against Palestinians and New
York State’s Acts of Genocide against Black
People are under federal scrutiny in the
case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin
Netanyahu, etal.……………………………………. 30
II.
The Circuit Courts and District Court’s
Decision are in Contravention of the Second
Circuit’s Mandate concerning Court
Corruption that was established in Chevron
v. Donziger.…………………………………………..……
32
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment
Right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
Viewpoint……………………………………………………
35
CONCLUSION
39
APPENDIX A
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3825-cv dated April 10, 2020 3
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3402-cv dated October 24, 2019 4
U.S. District Court Bar Order
19-cv-9064…………………………… 5-7
U.S. District Court Dismissal
19-cv-9064………………………….. 8-12
xv
ui u z n oi
c u 2 a m
APPENDIX B
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 108b,
footnote 34……………………………………………………………. 5
Artsot Ha-Hayyim, pages 52a/52b 8
Midrash Rabbah, Vol. 1, page 293 11
Legends of the Jews, Vol. page 169
The Curse of Drunkenness………… 13
Come and Hear, Sex with Children
by Talmud Rules………………………… 15
History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties in a
Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra-Orthodox Males
with Pedophilia……………………………………………….. 40
News Punch — News Punch — Netanyahu To Release
Evidence of a Pedophile in Washington DC…………… 48
Veterans Today, Larry King, Overachiever 54
Haaretz, A Nation of Pedophiles 66
Haaretz, Defying a Conspiracy of Silence about
Pedophilia…………………………..………………………. 68
Haaretz, Israel Become a Refuge for Pedophiles
Warns Advocate for Child Sex Abuse…………….. 69
Haaretz, Israel Admits Ethiopian Women Were
Given Birth Control Shots…………………………….. 70
The Truth about Prostitution in Israel 71
xviThe Haredim (Orthodox Jews) Who Crowd Tel Aviv
Brothels……………………………………………………………… 72
Tikum Olam: The Ringworm Scandal: When Israeli
Doctors Killed Tens of Thousands of Arab Jewish
Children…………………………………………………………….. 77
Tikun Olam: Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies
Murdered in Medical Experiments, Abducted from
Parents, and Exploited in Paid National Institutes of
Health Experiments……………………………………..…………. 81
Telesur: 59,000 Palestinian Children Physically
Abused by Israel…………………………………………… 86
Monoweiss: Baltimore is Here; Ethiopian Jews
Protest Police Brutality in Jerusalem………….. 87
Anadolu Agency: Ethiopian Jews Suffer Racism in
Israel………………………………………………………………… 90
Personal Representative to the Dawabsheh Family v.
Benjamin Netanyahu……………………………………………. 91
The Ten Stages of Genocide 271
APPENDIX C
David P. Walker’s Facebook Statement 6
Tara A. Uzamere’s Affidavit and Exhibits 7
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Affidavit 11-12
xvn
iu e z n oI
\
c u z a m
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Certificate/License…………………….. 13
New York State Department of Health Father-
Identity-Lacking Birth Certificate………………… 14
1-130 Falsified Immigration Form 15
1-214 Complaint Form to Immigration and
Naturalization Service…………………………... 16-19
Attorney Osato Eugene Uzamere Falsified
Affirmation…………………………………………….. 20-21
Ehigie Uzamere Falsified Affidavit
(Posing as “Godwin E. Uzamere”)… 22-27
Respondent Honorable Justice Jeffrey Sunshine
Interlocutory Decision, page 9…………………………. 28
Respondent Honorable Jeffrey Sunshine
Decision Regarding Identity of Petitioner’s
Husband Ehigie Uzamere……………………….. 29-30
FOIA Response from U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services Regarding Identity of
Ehigie Uzamere with Exhibits…………………. 31-33
General Docket Sheet for Docket No. 19-3402
as of Julyl2, 2020……………………………………… 34-38
Order of Dismissal/Show Cause with
Superimposed Date October 17, 2010
38-43
Petitioner’s Notice on Record of Appeal dated
October 17, 2019…………..……………………………. 44-48
XVlllPetitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Declaration of Motion to Withdraw Court’s
Fraudulent Sua Sponte Notice of Interlocutory
Appeal Docket No. 19-3402 dated
October 22, 2019……………………………………………. 49-185
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York, Case No. 19-3402……………………..
186
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York with Mandate for Case No. 19-3402 187
General Docket Sheet for Docket 19-3825 188-196
Docket Notice and Notice of Appeal for
Docket 19-3825 (pages 1-5) Dated
November 13, 2019…………………………… 197-201
Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
and Certificate of Services dated
December 16, 2019…………………………….. 202-203
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Affidavit/Declaration in Support of Motion
Dated December 16, 2019……………………………… 204-205
Petitioner’s Brief, Page 1 dated
December 16, 2019………………… 206
Letter from Benjamin Torrance dated
January 6, 2020……………………………… 207-208
Letter from Oren L. Zeve dated
January 6, 2020…………………….
209-211
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief dated
January 15, 2020……………………………………… 212
xix
I
1
ui e z n a
!\
c u z
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix A
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 213
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix B
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 214
Petitioner’s Combined Amended Response
And Reply and Motion in Support dated
January 15, 2020…………………………………… 215
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
dated January 21, 2020…………………………………… 216
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix A dated January 21, 2020………………… 217
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix B dated January 21, 2020………………… 218
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix C dated January 21, 2020………………… 219
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix D dated January 21, 2020……………….. 220
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement
and Combined Amended Affidavit in Support
dated January 31, 2020……………………………… 221
xxTABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District 27
Bryan v. Moore
7, 35
Bulloch v. United States,
763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985) 21, 32
Chevron v. Donziger 1, 21, 32, 33, 34
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive
Health, et al., 462 U.S. 416, 103 S. Ct. 2481; 76 L.
Ed. 2d 687……………………………………………………….. 1, 21, 32,
Federal Communications Commission, v. Fox
Television Stations, 10-1293, 567 U.S. 239, 132 S.
Ct. 2307; 183 L. Ed. 2d 234; 2012 WL 2344462;
2012 U.S. LEXIS 4661;…………………………………….. 21
Johnson v. United States, 13-7120, 576 U.S. 591,
135 S. Ct. 2551; 192 L. Ed. 2d 569;………………..…. 21
Jordahl v. Brnovich 21
Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968) 21,32
Kolender, et al. v. Edward Lawson , 461 U.S. 352,
103 S. Ct. 1855; 75 L. Ed. 2d 903………………………. 21
Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1007 (2018) 21
Margaret Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville,
70-5030, 405 U.S. 156, 92 S. Ct. 839; 31 L. Ed. 2d
110; 1972…………………………………………………………….. 21
xxi
ui e z n o
i
ic u z a m
Personal Representative of the Dawabsheh
Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
etal.……………………………………………………….i, 15, 17, 22, 30
Sessions v. Dimaya\ 15-1498, 584 U.S., 138 S. Ct.
1204; 200 1. L. Ed. 2d 549; 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2497 22
Uzamere v. Allen E. Kaye, P.C., l:09-CV-3506,
S.D.N.Y. April 2, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 09-
1600-cv (2d Cir. June 24, 2009), cert, denied, 558
U.S. 965 (Oct. 13, 2009)…..………………………………. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Cuomo, No. ll-CV-2831 (E.D.N.Y. June
22, 2011), appeal dismissed, No. 11-2713-cv (2d Cir.
Nov. 28, 2011), cert denied, 565 U.S. 1264 (Mar. 19,
2012)………………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Rice, No. 08-CV-0891 (NGG)
(E.D.N.Y. July 6, 2007)……………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. United States, No. 13-505S, 2013 WL
5781216 (D.R.I. Oct. 25, 2013), affd, No.13-2454 (1st
Cir. Apr. 11, 2014), cert, denied, 135 S. Ct. 451 (Nov.
3, 2014)……………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Village of Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside,
Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 102 S. Ct.
1186; 71 L. Ed. 2d………………………………………………. 22
Constitutional Provisions
U.S. Const. Article VI, Section 2
Supremacy Clause…………………. 2, 7, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. I .1,2, 5, 7, 15,
22, 23, 27, 25
XXIIU.S. Const. Amend. V (Due Process) 2, 3, 14, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. XIII 2
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV (Due Process) 1, 3,
12, 14, 15, 28, 32
i
Statutes, Regulations, and Rules
18 U.S.C. § 873, blackmail, RICO 26
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 26, 33
18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B), domestic terrorism 23
18 U.S.C. § 1503, obstruction of justice 23
18 U.S.C. § 872, extortion 23
18 U.S.C. § 1951, Hobbs Act extortion 5, 23
28 U.S.C. § 1254(1) 1
Americans with Disabilities Act 15
Civil Rights Act of 1964 23
New York State Domestic Relations Law § 236 23
New York State Executive Law No. 157
16, 23
New York State Sessions Law S2942—A
(The Act) 1, 14, 16 23, 27, 28
Texas House Bill 89
27
Violence Against Women Act 22
XXlll
iu e z n oc u z a m
7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, J 60.23 32
Other Authorities
Babylonian Talmud
Tractate Abodah Zarah, Folio 26b
(Law of Moser)………………………….. 11, 15
Tractate Kethuboth, Folio lib 10
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 64a 36
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 745, 108b 7, 24, 16
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 57a 9
Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a 9, 35
Com eandHear
New America, America’s New Government
Church……………………………………………………. 6, 9
Death Penalty and Talmud Law,
Sentence and Execution…………. 6
What About Gentiles
Co-existence:…………. 24
Informing on Fellow Jews Who Commit
Crimes………………………………………………. 11
Sex with Children by Talmud Rules 11
XXIVThe Benediction against the Minim
Lawrence Schiffman……………………. 9, 11
Guide to the Perplexed
Rabbi Moses Maimonides 7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, page 293 Birkat HaMinim
8, 16, 25
8, 16, 25
8
Holy Bible
Genesis 19:1-23
38
Leviticus 20:1
Leviticus 20:1-5
25, 36
25
Leviticus 20:14
25
Numbers 25 38
Judges 19-21
Amos 5:23
39
37
Acts 7:42-43
37
xxv
ui e z n ac u z a m
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere, sole proprietor of Uzamere
Word Processing & More petitions this Court for a writ of
certiorari to review the judgment of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in this matter.
♦
OPINIONS BELOW
The decisions of the court of appeals is printed in
Appendix A (App. A) at 3a-4a. The district court’s opinions
are printed at App. A 5a-12a.
JURISDICTION
The court of appeals entered its judgment on April
10, 2020; this petition is therefore timely filed. This Court
has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1).
CONSTITUTIONAL AND
STATUTORY PROVISIONS
Article I, Section 8, the Commerce Clause of the United
States Constitution provides:
1. To regulate commerce with foreign nations,
and among the several states, and with the
Indian tribes;
2. To constitute tribunals inferior to the
Supreme Court;
1Article VI, Section 2, the Supremacy Clause of the
United States Constitution provides:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United
States…shall be the supreme Law of the
Land…
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law;
The Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
The Judicial power of the United States shall
not be construed to extend to any suit in law or
equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of
the United States by Citizens of another State,
or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,
except as a punishment for crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
2
ui e z n o
ic u 2 a m
within the United States, or any place subject
to their jurisdiction.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution provides:
Section 1: nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.
Statutory Provisions
Civil Law
42JJ.S.C. §19_8_1,.Equal Rights Under the Law:
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United
States shall have the same right in every State
and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to
sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full
and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings
for the security of persons and property as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject
to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes,
licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no
other.
42JLI.S.C.§1983,CivilActionfor_DeprivatiQn_of
Rights
Every person who, under color of any statute,
ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any
State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen
of the United States or other person within the
jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any
3rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the
party injured in an action at law, suit in equity,
or other proper proceeding for redress, except
that in any action brought against a judicial
officer for an act or omission taken in such
officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall
not be granted unless a declaratory decree was
violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
Criminal Law
15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Law:
Every contract, combination in the form of trust
or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade
or commerce among the several states or with
foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every
person who shall make any contract or engage
in any combination or conspiracy hereby
declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of
a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be
punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if
a corporation, or, if any other person
$1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding
10 years, or by both said punishments, in the
discretion of the court.
18 U.S.C. § 1962, Racketeering-Influenced
C or rupt_organiz ation:
It shall be unlawful for any person through a
pattern of racketeering activity or through
collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or
maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in
or control of any enterprise which is engaged in,
or the activities of which affect, interstate or
foreign commerce.
4
ui e 2 n dl
\
\
cuzam
18U.S.C.§1951,Interferencejvith„Commerce
by ThreatsorViolenee
Whoever in any way or degree obstructs,
delays, or affects commerce or the movement of
any article or commodity in commerce, by
robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires to
do so, or commits or threatens physical violence
to any person or property in furtherance of a
plan or purpose to do anything in violation of
this section shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than twenty years, or
both.
18 U.S.C. § 3771, 18 U.S.C. § 10607(c), Crime
Victims’ Rights: A crime victim has the
following rights:
The right to be treated with fairness and with
respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.
¥
INTRODUCTION
“…Let me say first that a constitution, as
important as it is, will mean nothing unless the
people are yearning for liberty and freedom. If
the people don’t care, then the best constitution
in the world won’t make any difference. So, the
spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and
then the constitution
first, it should
safeguard basic fundamental human rights,
like our First Amendment, the right to speak
5freely, and to publish freely, without the
government as a censor.1,2
You should certainly be aided by all the
constitution-writing that has gone one since the
end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S.
constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in
the year 2012.”
Excerpt from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg interview with A1 Hayat TV in Egypt3
On November 5, 2002, nearly ten (10) years prior to
the publicized statement eschewing the U.S. Constitution
as a model for other countries to emulate, the National
Institute for Judaic Law celebrated its founding in the
building housing the U.S. Supreme Court. The gala …was
attended by 200 dinner guests, including justices from this
honorable Court.
Information regarding the gala was publicized by
Come and Hear, at the website entitled New America,
America’
s New Government Church.4
At the Come and Hear website, a chapter entitled
Death Penalty and Talmud Law, Sentence and Execution5
5, says:
I
I1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg;
2 https://www.memri.org/tv/us-supreme-court-justice-ruth-
baderginsburgegyptians-look-constitutions-south-africa-or-canada
3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg&t=3s
4 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html.
5 http://www.come-and-hear.eom/editor/capunish_l.html#n7
1
6
w p z n o1
c u z a in
SupremeCourtConsidersTalmudic Law
“In December 1999, the United States
Supreme Court set a precedent by accepting
for consideration an amicus [curiae] brief in a
death penalty case (Bryan v. Moore)…the brief
was based wholly on Talmud law.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
prohibits the favoring and/or establishment of any religion
in governmental settings. Governmental reliance on
religion, no matter how well-intentioned, is disingenuous
on its face because it violates the Supremacy Clause of the
U.S. Constitution.
The public is unaware of Babylonian Talmudic
dogma that is discriminatory and deadly to people of
African descent, Gentiles, children and especially
whistleblowers:
HatredofPeopleofAfricanDescent6
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio p. 745, 108b: „Our Rabbis taught: …
Ham was smitten in his skin.“ (This is
footnoted, and the footnote reads: „I.e., from
him was descended Cush (the negro), who is
black-skinned.“
Rabbi Moses Maimonides (RamBam), Guide
to the Perplexed: “[T]he Kushites (Negroes)
found in the remote South… rank lower than
the rank of man but higher than the rank of
apes. For they have the external shape and
lineaments of a man and a faculty of
http://_wjv_w_.ottmalLcom/mj_ht_arch/v_15/mj_vl5i20.html#jCDX
7discernment that is superior to that of the
apes.7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim: “the reason Abraham
Lincoln was killed was because he freed the
blacks, this is also the reason why Kennedy
was killed, i.e. because he was good to the
blacks. He continues by saying that this will
be the fate of any who adopt a progressive
attitude towards blacks, because they are
meant to be enslaved.
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
„AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN
(Breishit 9:25): (Commentary omitted) …R.
Huna also said in R. Joseph’s name: You [i.e.
Noah is speaking to Ham) have prevented me
from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed
will be ugly and dark-skinned. R. Chiyya said:
Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark
therefore, Ham came forth black-skinned
while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.“
Hatred of Christians
Birkat HaMinin (Curse against Christians):
…Let the nozerim and the minim be destroyed
in a moment. And let them be blotted out of
the Book of Life and not be inscribed together
with the righteous. Blessed art thou, O Lord,
who humblest the arrogant.“
7 https://www.sefaria.org/Guide_for_the_Perplexed%2C_Part_3.5171an
g=bi
8
ui e z n oc u z a m
Professor Lawrence H. Schiffman: …These
passages present evidence that some version
of the benediction was already recited in the
mid-second century C.E. and that it included
explicit reference to the Christians.8
ComeandHear, New_Ameriea,_America’s_N_ew
GovernmentChurch9
The Noahide Laws promise deadly
consequences for Christians… LORD God
tasked the Jews to enforce the seven Noahide
Commandments, and to enforce them with
liberal use of the death penalty.
EspQusaloftheSlaughterofGentiles
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio 57a: ‚For murder, whether of a Cuthean
by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean,
punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by
an Israelite, there is no death penalty‘?10
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama,
Folio 113a: ‚Where a suit arises between an
Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the
former according to the laws of Israel, justify
him and say: ‚This is our law‘; so also if you
can justify him by the laws of the heathens
justify him and say [to the other party:] ‚This
is your law‘; but if this cannot be done, we use
subterfuges to circumvent him.11
8 http://lawrenceschiffman.com/the-benediction-against-the-minim/
9 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html
10 https://halakhah.com/sanhedrin/_sanhedrin_5_7_.html
11 https://halakhah.com/babakamma/babakamma
113.html
_
9Death Penalty and the Babylonian Talmud12
…Talmud law insists on unequal justice
under law. Talmudic law holds there is one
law for Jews, and one for Gentiles. This is not
inconsistent
with the Old
Testament…Gentiles are the proper slaves of
Jews.
Co-existence?13
What does the future hold? Can the Jews ever
co-exist with the rest of humanity? The
answer is „yes,“ provided the rest of humanity
accepts the role designed for them by Jewish
leadership. If Gentiles do not accept
enslavement, there will be conflict.
The Worship of Molech and Pedophilia
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth,
Folio lib: GEMARA: … When a grown-up
man has intercourse with a little girl it is
nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it
is as if one puts the finger into the eye…»14
12 http://w_w_w_.come-and-hear.com/editor/cap.unish_4.html
13 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/gentile.html
14 https ://halakhah.com/kethuboth/kethuboth_l 1 .html
10
ui e z n dc u z a m
Come and Hear, Sex with Children by Talmud
Rules:15 Again, there is no prohibition of a
sexual practice that would almost certainly
cause physical damage to a young girl due to
the mismatched sizes of genitals between an
adult’s penis and a child’s vagina or anus.
In the Talmud, grown men are permitted to
have sexual intercourse with female babies and
children, and homosexual relations with boys
younger than nine.
Sentence
of Death
for
Christian/Minim,
__
__
__
Apostates and Whistleblowers/Mosrim16
R. Abbahu recited to R. Johanan: ‚Idolaters and
[Jewish] shepherds of small cattle need not be
brought up though they must not be cast in, but
minim, informers, and apostates may be cast
in, and need not be brought up.
Michael J. Broyde, Esq., Co-Directors of National
Institute for Judaic Law’s Inaugural Project17 expounded on
Zarah 26b’s
Abodah prohibition against
whistleblowing/meshira in his speech entitled “Informing on
Fellow Jews Who Commit Crimes18:
… the Talmud recounts – in a number of places
– that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the
secular government, even when their conduct is
a violation of secular law and even when their
conduct is a violation of Jewish law.
15 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
16 The Curse against Christians,
http://lawrenceschifrman.com/thebenediction-againstrthe-minim
17http://nijLorg/contactJitml
18 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/moser-broyde/index.html
11As of the writing of this petition, the petitioner’s
children are victims of sexual violence by respondent New
York State’s foster care system. They have never been
heard, and the petitioner’s attempts to seek justice on
behalf of her children has been successfully rebuffed by
members of the Ashkenazi community’s legal and judicial
community for several decades. The groom-identity-
lacking marriage affidavit containing the fictitious name
“Godwin E. Uzamere” that the petitioner’s husband and his
attorneys submitted to respondent New York State’s
Department of Health, New York City Clerk’s Marriage
License Bureau and the U.S. Department of Justice’s
Immigration and Naturalization Service were criminally
used as an identification document to produce a falsified
marriage license; a falsified birth certificate; a falsified
request for immigration status; and decades of the
petitioner’s receipt of public assistance from respondent New
York State based on its acceptance of the groom-
identification-lacking marriage affidavit that successfully
removed the petitioner’s husband as financial protector from
the then-pregnant petitioner and her children.
Additionally, in spite of the district court’s, the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security’s and the respondent
New York State appellate court’s recognition of
petitioner’s husband as the former Nigerian Senator
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, the respondent New York State’s
Department of Health and its political subdivision New
York City Clerk’s Marriage License Bureau have
vehemently refused to correct their records to reflect
petitioner and her daughter’s rightful marital and
consanguineous
relationship to their African relative,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
Respondent New York State has normalized the
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause’s extension, the Civil Rights Act that prohibits age
discrimination by allowing the ritualized fellating of
12
ui e z n 3c u z a m
helpless Ashkenazi boys during bris, such that in the City
of New York, eleven (11) Ashkenazi baby boys have
contracted herpes, with two (2) of them dying.19 There has
been an upsurge of the killings of unarmed people of
African descent by law enforcement officers across the
country. Although Chinese citizens and the Chabad
Lubavitch were exposed to COVID-19 during the outbreak
in Wuhan, American citizens of African descent are now
listed as being disproportionately affected because of
issues associated with anti-black racism, with the vast
majority of people still not knowing that anti-Hamite/anti-
Canaanite/anti-African hatred is a defamatory religious
teaching associated with the Babylonian Talmud.
This country is now in the grips of the enforcement
of Israel anti-boycott laws. Israel’s prime minister has: 1)
called for the enforcement of the Babylonian Talmud; 2)
threatened U.S. politicians with exposing those who
engaged in sex with children; but, 3) has withheld the
identities of those U.S. politicians Israel’s prime minister
claims had sex with children from the parents, who like
the petitioner, are worried sick about the effects of rape on
their children, and are victims of the intentional infliction of
emotional distress associated with the inability to obtain
justice for their children because of the respondents’
single-minded determination to support Israel’s Ashkenazi-
led government.
As of the completion of this petition, the petitioner
alleges that the respondents have made themselves
unavailable for service by electronic means – as suggested by
this Court. The respondents have refused to comply with
petitioner’s request for return receipt for e-mail sent to them.
https://_ww_w.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmv/rhtml/mm6122a2.htm7.s_cids
mm6122a
13With the assistance of the district and circuit courts,
the petitioner is again forcibly relegated to the position of a
helpless, nonconsenting sex slave to mimic the sexually
sadistic domestic terrorism, sexual harassment, sexual
predation and psychological gang-rape to which the
respondents subjected the petitioner’s children after
facilitating the use of the fictitious name “Godwin E.
Uzamere” to remove the petitioner’s husband as a financial
protector for the petitioner and her children. The petitioner
also alleges that based on a long-term pattern of behavior
associated with members of the Ashkenazi community who
are jurists, there is a disproportionately high percentage of
them who are pedophile-oriented sexually sadistic predators,
who, when adjudicating the lawsuits of unprotected self-
represented litigants, especially in forma pauperis litigants,
create any legal ruse to use their positions of power
psychologically “gang-rape” helpless pro se litigants20.
The petitioner seeks to avail herself of the benefits
of the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy, Freedom of Speech,
Establishment, Religion, Petition, Due Process and Equal
Protection clauses, and to allow the petitioner to present
her request for certiorari with the openness of which the
attendees of the founding of the National Institute for
Judaic Law availed themselves. More importantly, this
petition seeks to connect respondent New York State’s
enforcement of S2942—A, the Israel Anti-Boycott Law to
20 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Sexual Sadism
Disorder
Diagnostic
Criteria
302.84 ’ (F65.52)
(https://mrkmnls.co/2XtKlgi) Over a period of at least 6 months,
recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological
suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or
behaviors…The diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are
intended to apply both to individuals who freely admit to having such
paraphilic interests and to those who deny any sexual interest in the
physical or psychological suffering of another individual despite
substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
14
ui e z n oc u z a m
the unconstitutional enforcement
Talmud’s Law of Moser.
of the Babylonian
To that end, the petitioner has, in addition to
availing herself of her First Amendment right to petition
the government for a redress of grievances, has further
exercised her First Amendment right to free speech by
informing the members of the European Union and the
African Union of the existence of this petition before filing
it with this honorable Court, as well as members of the
international Hamitic/Canaanite/African community, to
expose the havoc that the continued interference of the
Babylonian Talmud has wrought, and in particular, the
havoc that children of Hamitic/Canaanite/African descent
have suffered, who petitioner alleges like her son, were
gang-raped as a result of the enforcement of the
Babylonian Talmudic Law of Moser, which the petitioner
alleges has now been politicized into the New York State
Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Cheryl D. Uzamere, the petitioner, is a member of
several groups that are protected by federal statutes that
invoke the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause. She is an African American. She is a woman. She
is one of Jehovah’s Witnesses and a servant of the true god,
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ; and hater of Molech, the god of pedophilia, sexual
pervasion associated with pedophilia and child sacrifice.
She was diagnosed as having bipolar disorder, an organic
mental condition in February 1993, that is recognized as a
disability pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act,
and for which she has received Social Security Disability
Insurance retroactively since 1996. She is the mother of
David Paul Walker and Tara Ann Uzamere, African
American children who are victims of sexually sadistic
15terrorism by respondents New York State and New York
City’s Babylonian Talmud-based foster care system, and
who were kidnapped and trafficked by respondent State of
New York and City of New York for purposes of the
Babylonian Talmud/Molech-fomented trafficking of
humans for the sex trade and kidnapping and trafficking
of boys of African descent for anal sodomy. She is an
individual against whom the extrajudicial sentence of
death has been ordered pursuant to the Babylonian
Talmudic crime of meshira/mesira (whistleblowing), a
religious law that is now politicized and legalized by New
York State Executive Order No. 157 and the New York
State Legislative Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A
regarding boycotting Israel.
Based on those matters in which she was personally
involved, and on information and belief as to all other
matters, she makes the following statements under
penalty of perjury.
Statement of Petitioner’s Son, David Paul Walker’s
Sexual Abuse While a Client at JCCA-Edenwald Group
Home
The petitioner became aware of the incident
described below sometime during 2018. The petitioner’s
son, David Paul Walker described an occasion where, while
he was six years old, he was in a setting where the
employees of JCCA-Edenwald did not supervise the
sleeping area, nor provide security cameras or security
guards to ensure that her son’s or other foster children
were safe, in what she alleges was an attempt to hide their
goals of allowing Babylonian Talmud-adherent, sex-crazed
members of the Ashkenazi Jewish community to engage in
the Babylonian Talmudic practice of anally sodomizing the
petitioner’s son:
16
ui e z n Dc u z a m
“Please Mr. Don’t touch me there, I’m only
six…love you not, hate you a lot, Shall we
commence to crucifix???… When I was a little
boy, teenage boy masturbated in front of me,
then politely ask me to lick???… “If you come
near me, I’ll scream”
, First time seeing
someone else’s dick… So easy to pass
judgment, tell everybody else what to do…Say
stranger, my advice but your ass, shall we
suffer together for a spell or two??? Disturbed
by the vacant lifeless expression in my eyes
yes
??? of
Systematic
rape my
soul…prolonged torture of my mind, please
my darling. I wholeheartedly invite you to try
your best…
Statement of Petitioner’s Daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere
That Was Ignored By New York State Supreme Court
Justice Jeffrey S. Sunshine:
The petitioner’s daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere, now a
registered nurse with the State of New York for over 10
years, submitted a New York State-notarized affidavit in
which she described Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, at that time a
senator for the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as her father:
I, Tara A. Uzamere, being duly sworn,
depose and say that:
1) I am the daughter of the Plaintiff
and the Defendant in the above-entitled action.
2) following facts:
I make this Affidavit based on the
3) That the Plaintiff has always told
me that Defendant is my father ever since I was
a child.
174) That I met the Defendant for the first
time at JFK Airport in Jamaica, New York
around the year 2004 to the best of my
recollection.
5)
That I took a photograph of the
Defendant during the aforesaid visit.
Photograph taken at JFK Airport is hereby
attached as Exhibit A.
6) That on the day that I first met the
Defendant at JFK Airport, I called my friend
Eusi Patterson on the cell phone that I used to
take a photograph of the Defendant.
7)
That on the aforesaid day the
Defendant openly and notoriously introduced
himself to Eusi as my father.
8) That I met and visited the
Defendant’s late brother, John Uzamere at 476
Amboy Street.
9) That the Defendant and his
brother George Uzamere openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at 489 Ray
Street, Freeport, New York.
10)
That while I was a resident in
Freeport, New York, I experienced a car
accident, and that George Uzamere and the
Defendant openly and notoriously sent checks
to pay the rest of my car note to Drive
Financial, a financing company based in
Dallas, Texas.
18
uiezn:c u z a m
11) That the Defendant openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at Nichol
Road in Wyandanch, New York.
12) That the Defendant met my
landlord, Martin Marta when the Defendant
visited me while I was living at the aforesaid
address.
13) That during the aforesaid meeting
the Defendant openly and notoriously
identified himself to my landlord as my father.
14) That I spoke with Wellington
Uzamere on the telephone several times before
and after I first met the Defendant.
15) That Wellington Uzamere
referred to the Defendant as „Ehigie.“
16) That based on information
received from members of the Edo/Bini
community as well as my own belief, my facial
structure resembles that of the Defendant as
evidenced in my photograph hereby attached as
Exhibit B.
17) That while I spend three or four
pleasant occasions with the Defendant and
received monetary gifts during those occasions,
the Defendant has never been a consistent part
of my life as I explained in the report [that] I
provided to Nigerian newspaper Huhu Online.
See aforesaid report hereby attached as Exhibit
C.
1918) That based on what I learned at
Long Island College School of Nursing
regarding psychiatric nursing and psychiatric
illnesses, as well as personal day-to-day
observation of the Plaintiff, that while the
Plaintiffs predominate affect is consistent with
what I believe to be hypomania, the Plaintiff is
not psychotic and does not require
hospitalization, as untruthfully implied by
Eugene
Uzamere’s defamatory
characterization of the Plaintiff as „certifiably
insane“ to Nigerian newspaper Point Blank
News Online, hereby attached as Exhibit D.
19) That before 2004 the Defendant
never visited me; never celebrated a birthday
with me; never kissed me; never told me he
loved me; never wiped away my tears; never
talked to me about God; never attended a house
of God with me; never read me a Bible story;
never talked to me about how to comport myself
around men or the importance of being a chaste
woman; never let other men know that I was
precious to him; never let other men know that
they would be responsible to him if they hurt
me; never held my hand; never walked with me;
never sat me on his lap; never played games
with me; never took me to the movies; never
picked me up; never gave me a hug; never
attended a school meeting with my teachers;
never visited me in the hospital; never told me
he was proud of me; never accompanied me to a
father/daughter dance, never attended a
graduation; never invited other members of the
Edo/Bini community to a naming ceremony in
honor of my birth; never told me that he was
glad I was born and never treated me like he
loved me and wanted to protect me from the
20
ui e 2 n ocuzam
dangers of the world the way normal fathers do
with their daughters, and especially in the
manner that Nigerian men are known to treat
their children.
20) That the falsely concocted
„counter-affidavit“ and the falsely concocted
affirmation by Eugene Uzamere makes me
feel heartsick because I have always been
made to believe by the Plaintiff, the
Defendant and members of the Defendant’s
family that the Defendant is my father and
that being a blood member of the Uzamere
clan, a blood member of the proud and ancient
Edo/Bini nation and culture and being a
native Nigerian based on consanguinity are
my birthrights and a part of who I am; that the
aforesaid „counter-affidavit and attorney’s
affirmation are emotionally and psychologically
abusive as they suggest that I am a bastard
child while the Defendant is not willing to end
the question of paternity by taking a simple
DNA test.
21) That I now experience financial
difficulties such that I do not have money to
return to college to continue studying nursing,
and that because of the Plaintiffs advanced age
and disability, it is very difficult for her to
obtain employment to help me pay for college;
PELL grant rejection information is attached at
Exhibit E.
22) That I am willing to submit myself
for honest DNA testing to confirm that the
Defendant is my father if conditions can be
controlled so that the Defendant does not know
and cannot access the location of the laboratory
21where said DNA test is performed so that the
Defendant does not unduly influence anyone to
lie about the results of the DNA test as it seems
the Defendant was able to do on the marriage
affidavit where the municipal clerk signed
his/her name to indicate that he/she verified
the Defendant’s age, but that on inspection of
said page, did not mark off any box to indicate
the type of identification the municipal clerk
used to verify the Defendant’s age and date of
birth and identity; see Plaintiffs Affidavit and
Application for License to Marry, top of back
page hereby attached as Exhibit F.
Wherefore, as the Defendant has forced
the Plaintiff and I to suffer domestic violence as
identified by the U.S. Justice Department’s
Office of Violence Against Women, I
respectfully ask that this Court considers that
the Plaintiff is not just pleading for herself but
for our entire family; that this Court grant the
Plaintiffs lawful and just request to dismiss
attorney
Eugene Uzamere’s falsified
affirmation in its entirety, and to grant the
Plaintiffs motion for default judgment and
money judgment in its entirety.
The basis of the petitioner’s request for a writ of
certiorari by this Court is the lower courts’ refusal of her
request for declaratory and injunctive relief. The
petitioner asked the lower courts for two things: 1) the
right to speak; and 2) for the lower court to prevent the
respondents from violating the petitioner’s First
Amendment right to speak. The response of both the
district court and the circuit court were “Plaintiff, we will
not allow you to speak about issues regarding the gang-
rape of your children, the falsified marriage-affidavit or
other issues contained in the 540 exhibits of your lawsuit.”
22
ui e z n oc u z a m
The petitioner requested the lower courts to grant
her First Amendment right to speak in court about, among
other things, the rape of her children. The Second Circuit,
a Sherman-Antitrust-violating, white supremacist,
Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi-led judicial
cartel where every U.S. attorney that received the
petitioner’s complaints are members of the Ashkenazim,
has consistently demonstrated to the petitioner that black
lives do not matter. The lower courts’ judiciary know that
with a disproportionate percentage of the Second Circuit’s
judiciary being members of a religion that teaches that
people of African descent are meant to be enslaved, that
the petitioner’s chances of being granted certiorari are
slim to none.
Pursuant to a recently enacted law, New York State
Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A, (“2942–A” or “the
Act”), the State of New York requires government
contractors to certify that they are not engaged in boycotts
of Israel or territories controlled by Israel.
The petitioner is the sole proprietor of a home-based
typing service. Over the course of several decades, the
respondents have sought to extort, defraud, and otherwise
torturously injure the petitioner by means of a plan they
conceived and executed against the petitioner and her
children. It has been continuously carried out a
racketeering-influenced criminal organization led by
members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi
leadership in positions of great power, among others,
immigration attorneys, Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro,
New York State Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey S.
Sunshine and other New York State Supreme Court
justices/judges, federal and municipal law enforcement
officers, Affinity Federal Credit Union; Metavante
Corporation; Verizon, Inc.; the New York City Housing
Authority; New York City Comptroller’s Office’s 50-H
23attorney Jane Barrett; New York City Department of
Information Technology and Telecommunication; the City
University of New York; the New York City Police
Department; Web.com; the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission; the Social Security
Administration; the New York State Attorney General’s
Office; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; New York
City Health and Hospitals Corporation; New York State
Office of Mental Health, Brookdale Hospital Medical
Center, Interfaith Medical Center; the National Credit
Union Administration, America Works, Inc.; Brooklyn
Defender, Inc.; Federal Defenders of Brooklyn; Federation
Employment and Guidance Services (FEGS); and other
governmental and nongovernmental employees under the
control of respondent New York State’s powerful
Ashkenazi leadership for whom the petitioner provided the
circuit court with irrefutable proof of embezzlement of the
petitioner’s SSDI funds; malicious prosecution; unlawful
imprisonment; medical malpractice; but against whom
respondent New York State and its subdivision New York
City have done nothing.
The petitioner alleges that the Act superficially
seeks to suppress participation in political boycott
campaigns aimed at Israel and/or territories controlled by
Israel, particularly Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions
(“BDS”) campaigns. These campaigns seek to apply
economic pressure on Israel to protest the Israeli
government’s treatment of Palestinians and occupation of
the Palestinian territories.
The petitioner alleges that the real purpose of the
Act is to facilitate what the Israeli scientific and public
health sectors, the Israel movie entitled Conventional Sins
and CBS Channel 2 News identify as a disproportionately
high percentage of Ashkenazi Jews who have a
predisposition for pedophilia, and to use the Babylonian
Talmud’s misinterpretation regarding the Holy Bible’s
24
Ui G Z n 0c u 7. a ra
identity of Ham and his son Canaanite as the religious
excuse to subject them to international sexualized
enslavement and tyranny the Jehovah God and the U.S.
Constitution forbid. The petitioner alleges that, based on
historical records: a) from the completion of the writing of
the Babylonian Talmud; b) to the Babylonian Talmud’s
promulgation of the inferiority of people of African descent;
c) to Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership’s monopolization of the African slave trade
where Africans, including their children were anally
sodomized; d) to Ashkenazi Jew-controlled Israel’s murder
of over 100,000 Arab-Jewish and Palestinian children
during the Ringworm Experiment; e) to Israel’s Knesset’s
acknowledgment of the Ashkenazi Jew-controlled
kidnapping, torturous experimentation and murder of
thousands of Yemeni Jewish children; f) to the Franklin
Scandal where children, predominately European boys
were removed from foster homes to be anally raped; g) to
the disproportionately high percentage of Ashkenazi
Jewish children who are fellated after circumcision, some
of who contracted herpes and died; h) to Jeffrey Epstein’s
numerous international forays for the purpose of raping
European American children; i) to New York State’s
warehousing of boys of African descent in distantly located
group homes where boys like my son, David Paul Walker
are anally sodomized; j) to Electric Intifada’s description
of Ashkenazi Jew-controlled weaponized rape of
Palestinians; k) to New York State’s immigration policy
that disproportionately admits individuals from South
Asia and the Middle East, parts of the world where the
institutionalized prostitution of children has been
normalized; 1) to Israel’s citizenry’s desperate attempts to
stop the flow of Ashkenazi Jewish pedophiles from using
Aliyah to escape prosecution in countries where they have
raped children, just to escape to Israel to rape children
there; the respondents have exhibited, not just a glaring
refusal to protect children, but an even more glaring
ability to create impoverished children who are trafficked
25and anally raped in its foster care system. The, petitioner
alleges that the respondents’ leaders are violent,
pedophilic sodomites, and that the BDS issue is a cover to
deflect attention from Ashkenazi Jewish’ leadership’s
organic predisposition for pedophilia.
Not only does the petitioner allege that respondent
New York State’s Anti-Boycott law is a cover for the
Ashkenazi community’s organic predisposition with
pedophilia and sexual sadism, the petitioner alleges that
the enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott law is a
violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Act; 18
U.S.C. § 1961-1968 regarding obstruction, domestic
terrorism and Hobbs Act extortion; a violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 873 regarding blackmail; and is as much an act of
sexually sadistic domestic terrorism and psychological
torture as is Israel’s prime minister’s act of sexualized,
blackmail/psychological torture regarding his threat to
expose U.S. politicians who are pedophiles21 relating to the
fate of the missing Yemenite children of the 1950s22, while
intentionally inflicting emotional distress on the parents
of the children who Israel’s prime minister claims were
raped by withholding the names of those U.S. politicians
Israel’s prime minister claims raped children. –
21 Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile Ring —
Chinese https://bit.ly/3hHE0_Cy_.
22 Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies Murdered in Medical
Experiments, https://bit.ly/2ZwEitY.
26
uieznsi
c u z a m
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION
I. New York State Sessions Law S2942—A is
U nconstitutional.
a) Other Federal Courts Have Found that
the Israel Anti-Boycott Law is
U nconstitutional
In an article entitled Third Federal Court Rules
Anti-BDS Law Violates First Amendment3, the website
TheFire.org stated:
Last week, a federal court in Austin,
Texas issued an order blocking enforcement of
a state law dubbed Texas’ “anti-BDS bill” by
the governor. Texas House Bill 89, enacted in
2017, required government contractors to
certify that they do not and would not boycott
Israel while doing business with a state
entity.
The
order in Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District granted the
preliminary injunction motions of five sole
proprietors in two consolidated lawsuits filed
in late 2018 by the ACLU and the Council on
American-Islamic Relations.
Last year, federal district courts in Kansas24 and
Arizona25 sustained First Amendment challenges and
issued injunctions against enforcement of the state laws.
23 Third federal court rules anti-BDS law violates First Amendment,
https://bit.ly/3hQ9MBS.
24 Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp.3d 1007 (2018)
25 Jordahl, et al v. Brnovich, et al, 18-16896
27b) Respondent New York State’s Sessions Law
S2942—A Violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
the Hobbs Act.
The petitioner alleges that enforcement of New York
State’s Israel Anti-Boycott law sets the stage for its own
undoing because it violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
RICO law regarding the Hobbs Act.
The News Punch website published an article entitled
Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile
Ring, the article states:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
just declassified 400,000 documents that
expose child trafficking and a child sex ring
in Washington.
Per se violations of the Sherman Antitrust law do not
allow justifications. Conversely, while per se acts cannot be
defended or justified, there are limited exceptions where
courts will instead apply the rule of reason.26 For example,
in Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 363 F 3d.
761 (8th Cir. 2004), the Eighth Circuit held that an
agreement between Ford and a trade association of
limousine converters to prevent the plaintiff from
advertising its products in the trade association publications
was motivated by safety concerns. Thus, the court applied
the rule of reason even though this was a (non-price)
horizontal conspiracy among competitors.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on It
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
26 BonaLaw PC – Does the Group Boycott Violate Antitrust Laws
https://bit.ly/2Nop6aN
28
ui e z n oc u z a m
The website The Chronicle for Social Change
published an article dated February 27, 2019 entitled New
York City Confronts Massive Overrepresentation of Black
Children in Foster Care. The article states:
… the foster care system is expanding its efforts
to address longstanding disparities, especially
for black children whose presence in the system
is roughly double their share of the general
population.
…It’s part of ACS’ recent focus on “lifting the
value of racial disproportionality to the value of
safety and risk within our system,” says David
Peters, ACS’ head of the Office of Equity
Strategies (OES). That focus was prompted in
part by a legislative package De Blasio
signed in September of 2017, which mandated
training on implicit bias, discrimination and
structural inequity at city agencies.
…Fifty-three percent of the roughly 9,000
children in the city foster care system identified
as black in 2017, according to state data. Yet,
only around a quarter of all New Yorkers
younger than 18 are black.
The petitioner alleges that the implicit bias against
black children is directly related to the Babylonian Talmud’s
explicit dissemination of anti-black hatred, its espousal of
pedophilia and the Ashkenazi community’s organic
predisposition for pedophilia; however Babylonian Talmud-
adherent, Ashkenazi leadership has been as silent on these
religious doctrines just as nearly all other members of the
Ashkenazi community have done.
– 29d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
et al.
The lawsuit entitled Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et al,
makes the following statements:
For most Americans, the concepts relied upon
by the Palestinian Plaintiffs in this case (i.e.
ethnic cleansing, genocide, denationalization,
and dehumanization) are foreign concepts not
part of normal American vernacular. However,
these concepts are as American as apple pie.
The indigenous American Indian population
and the African slaves brought to America have
been victimized by these identical war crimes.
Each group has been subject to ethnic
cleansing, genocide, expropriation of private
property, confinement to reservations and
ghettos, wholesale denial of their fundamental
freedoms, subjected to a biased criminal justice
system, and deemed to be irrelevant and
disenfranchised members of American society.
Like Palestinian-Americans these groups can
file their own war crime lawsuits here in federal
district court. The reasons: (a) the similarity of
injuries sustained (wanton destruction of
property, starvation diets, and poisoning of
water wells and livestock); (b) the identical
means employed to subjugate these groups
(The New York Police Department murdered
Amadou Diallo with 51 bullets and Mr. Shapira
used 87 bullets to massacre 29 Palestinians);
30
iii e 2 n oc u z a m
/
and (c) for over 400 years, they have been
victims of an ethnic cleansing/genocidal
campaign similar to the one started by
Defendant PMN in 1998. See U.S. State
Department Manual on the 10 Stages of
Genocide, Exhibit B.
With respect to the role that Defendant Cuomo
played in terms of denationalization, he has not
directly funded international terrorists.
However, along with his hero, Defendant
Hikind, he has deprived 195 million Americans
in thirty-six different states of the right to
support the Palestinian cause and criticize
PMN’s campaign to denationalize the
Palestinian population…On behalf of the
Israeli government, not his New York state
constituency (which rejected the anti-BDS
legislation), Defendant Cuomo convinced forty
governors to enact an unconstitutional
executive order criminalizing the anti-Boycott,
Divestiture, and Sanction movement
[hereinafter BDS].
The New York State anti-BDS legislation
violated fundamental liberties cherished by
Americans, e.g. their right to criticize a foreign
country’s human rights record. That legislation
requires US. citizens to sign what amounts to
loyalty oaths to Israel. It has had a serious
chilling effect on freedom of speech and interstate
commerce (italics added). The Israeli
spokespersons in charge of this program and
tasked with convincing their fellow Americans
that Palestinians are “savages” not deserving of
their own state are Defendants Cuomo and
Hikind, even though they are not registered as
Israeli agents under the Federal Agent
31Registration Act 22 U.S.C. 611 (hereinafter
FARA).
II.
The Circuit Court’s and District Court’s Decision
is in Direct Contravention of Its Own Mandate
concerning Court Corruption that was
established in Chevron v. Donziger.
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121
(10th Cir. 1985), the court stated „Fraud upon the court is
fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and
is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents,
false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a
member is corrupted or influenced or influence is
attempted or where the judge has not performed his
judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of
the court have been directly corrupted.”
“Fraud upon the court“ has been defined by the 7th
Circuit Court of Appeals to „embrace that species of fraud
which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a
fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the
judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its
impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for
adjudication.“ Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7
Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ‘I 60.23. The 7th
Circuit further stated: „a decision produced by fraud upon
the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never
becomes final.“
Fraud upon the court violates the Supremacy Clause
of the U.S. Constitution because it violates the Fifth
Amendment’s Due Process Clause. The petitioner further
holds that when judges are involved in acts of fraud upon
the court related to a particular issue, and/or similar
issues that are related to a specific litigant or specific
groups of litigants, especially in relation to issues
regarding the commission of federal law, those acts
32
ui ez nsc u z a m
constitute violation of 18 USC § 1961-1968, RICO laws,
especially as they pertain to the second circuit’s
enforcement of Chevron v. Donziger.
On August 8, 2016, the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court rendered
in the case Chevron v. Donziger, et al (See 974 F.Supp.2d
362 (2014)).
The district court found that defendants Steven
Donziger and his law firm engaged in RICO-predicate acts
under
the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 that resulted in
a corrupt judgment by a Ecuadorian court, and that
because the defendants’ acts led to the Ecuadorian court’s
corrupt decision, the judgment was unenforceable in
federal court under federal law and under New York
common law.
Liberally sprinkled throughout the circuit court’s
decision are the terms “obstruction of justice (pages 96, 97,
98), and “procured by fraud” (pages 70, 109, 111, 112).
The Second Circuit’s decision in Chevron v.
Donziger, et al, in affirming the district court’s decision,
held that the defendants: 1) submitted fraudulent
evidence, 2) told “half-truths…to U.S. courts in attempts
to prevent exposure of other wrongdoing.”
In the petitioner’s case, the district court’s decision
named petitioner’s prior lawsuits: 1) Uzamere v. Allen E.
Kaye, P.C; 2) Uzamere v. Cuomo; 3) Uzamere v. Rice; and
4) Uzamere v. United States.
The district court’s decision stated that:
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action
arising from her 1979 marriage to and
33subsequent abandonment by her husband,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere… Plaintiff submits to
the Court a 205-page complaint with 540
pages of exhibits.
The petitioner cannot understand how the district
court was honestly able to count the 540 pages of exhibits,
while missing the first exhibit: respondent New York State
Department of Health’s/New York City Clerk’s marriage
affidavit that bore the petitioner/bride’s legal name and
proof of identity but failed to provide petitioner’s
husband/groom’s legal name and accompanying proof of
identity.
The district court also removed 79 of 90 defendants
from the petitioner’s case without explanation, and later
withdrew its own decision granting IFP status after the
petitioner filed her complaint regarding the district court’s
unexplained removal of 79 defendants from her lawsuit
(see Appendix C).
Based on the Second Circuit’s enforcement of RICO
laws regarding court corruption in the case Chevron v.
Donziger, the petitioner believes that she has justiciable
issues regarding the district court’s RICO-predicate acts
based on the district court’s and respondent New York
State’s courts’ acts of obstruction of justice regarding
respondent New York State’s facilitation of her husband’s
and his immigration attorneys’ acts of immigration fraud,
identity fraud, and the removal of the petitioner’s husband
as
financial protector to facilitate the sexual violence
committed against the petitioner’s children while they
were clients of respondent New York State’s foster care
system.
34
ui e 2 n o
:c u z a m
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment Right to
advise this Court of Jehovah’s Viewpoint
The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public
Affairs submitted its amicus brief to present Babylonian
Law as humane. However, the amicus brief submitted by
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s in the case Bryan v. Moore was
deceptive.27 The amicus brief cites references that are
unchallengeable to the Babylonian Talmud-ignorant
public who do not know or do not have access to the
Babylonian Talmud. To those who have knowledge of the
Babylonian Talmud, or who like the petitioner, have
downloaded the Babylonian Talmud in its entirety can see
that the cited references were not relevant in Mr. Bryan’s
case. Even worse, COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s capitalizing of Mr.
Bryan’s unfortunate situation was a shameless attempt at
self-aggrandizement and aggrandizement of Babylonian
Talmudic law and Ashkenazi Jewish culture. The brief
itself makes the statement:
COLPA and IAJLJ are vitally interested in
promoting the study of, and respect for,
principles of Jewish Law as they have been
applied throughout the history of the Jewish
people. COLPA and the national groups that
it routinely represents promote and
encourage in-depth study of Talmudic texts.
IAJLJ has sponsored public lectures in
Jewish Law and promoted the publication of
scholarly essays in the field of Jewish Law.
27 “…Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a
(https://halakhah.com/pdfynezikin/Baba_Kama.pdf): Where a suit arises
between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former
according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: ‘This is our law’; so
also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and
say [to the other party:] ‘This is your law’; but if this cannot be done, we
use subterfuges to circumvent him.
35While COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s attorneys cited, but did
not quote Leviticus 20 regarding the use of fire to punish
men who have sexual relations with their mothers-in law
along with their wives, they failed to mention what
Jehovah’s word says in the verses above regarding
Jehovah’s condemnation of the worship of Molech:
Leviticus 20:14: And if a man [take] with his
wife also her mother, it is wickedness: they
shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that
there be no wickedness among you.
Leviticus 20:1-5:And Jehovah spoke unto
Moses, saying: Moreover, thou shalt say to
the children of Israel: Whosoever he be of the
children of Israel, or of the strangers that
sojourn in Israel, that giveth of his seed unto
Molech; he shall surely be put to death; the
people of the land shall stone him with stones.
I also will set My face against that man, and
will cut him off from among his people,
because he hath given of his seed unto
Molech, to defile My sanctuary, and to profane
My holy name.
And if the people of the land do at all hide
their eyes from that man, when he giveth of
his seed unto Molech, and put him not to
death…
Another glaring omission that attorneys for
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s made regarding the Babylonian
Talmud’s pretense at humanity is stated earlier in this
petition in Tractate Sanhedrin 64a:
36
uiEznsc u 2 a m
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Jehovah’s word the Bible has long identified the
nation of Israel as worshippers of Molech. Ancient history
identifies Molech as the god of pedophilia and child
sacrifice.
Jehovah’s Prophet Amos, as well as the Apostle
Stephen says the following regarding Israel’s worship of
Molech:
Amos 5:23: “Did ye bring unto Me sacrifices
and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O
house of Israel? So shall ye take up Siccuth
your king and Chiun your images, the star of
your god, which ye made to yourselves.
Therefore, will I cause you to go into captivity
beyond Damascus, saith He, whose name is
Jehovah God of hosts.”
Acts 7:42-43: “…just as it is written in the
book of the Prophets: ‘It was not to me that
you made offerings and sacrifices for 40 years
in the wilderness, was it, O house of
Israel? But it was the tent of Mo loch and the
star of the god Re phan that you took up, the
images that you made to worship them. So, I
will deport you beyond Babylon.”
In 2012, the University of Ben Gurion in the Negev
submitted a report to the U.S. National Institutes of
Health entitled History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties
37in a Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra – orthodox Males with
Pedophilia based on the Ashkenazi Jewish community’s
problem with pedophilia as a public health concern. It
says:
Results: … 82.6% of participants were victims
of sexual trauma as children and 87% suffer
from some kind of organic vulnerability
(learning disabilities, disinhibitions, etc.).
Limitations: Limitations of this small
convenience sample that influence ability to
generalize are discussed.
Conclusions: The current survey indicates
that in this sample, the ultra-orthodox male
pedophile was frequently a victim of
childhood sexual trauma and exhibited
indications of organic vulnerabilities. This is
more pronounced than findings in previous
studies and calls for further research in order
to understand the underlying causes.
Sexual abuse in the ultra-orthodox
community is a serious and under-researched
phenomenon. …
Lastly, the petitioner makes the following
observations as a respectful reminder that there is a Power
that transcends the power of this Court, and that the
petitioner is obedient to that Power. That Power is
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ.
In the Bible there are examples that show Jehovah’s
condemnation of gang rape, group sexual depravity and
child sacrifice. Genesis 19:1-23 (Sodom and Gomorrah);
Numbers 25 (Israel’s being lured into worship of Baal-Peor
38
ui e z n dcuzam
to engage in group sex); Judges 19-21 (gang rape and
murder of a Levite’s concubine. These acts are consistent
with individuals who are worshippers of Molech, practices
that the Babylonian Talmud allows, but Jehovah Himself
and the U.S. Constitution forbid.
Jehovah’s told the Prophet Moses to warn Israel,
and by extension, the rest of the world about His hatred
for Molech worshippers in Leviticus 20:1: Any man of
Israel and any foreigner …who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail.
CONCLUSION
The Petition for a writ of certiorari should be
granted.
Respectfully submitted,
CHERYL D. UZAMERJE
Sole Proprietor 1/
Uzamere Word Processing More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
chexyl.uzamere_@juzamerewordpr
QC.essing.net
39
c u z a m
Supreme Court, U.S.
FILED
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
No.
?o-M
•Bn W&t
Supreme Court pt tfie 3Hmteb States?
CHERYL D. UZAMERE AS SOLE PROPRIETOR OF
UZAMERE WORD PROCESSING & MORE
Petitioner,
v.
THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
Respondents.
On Petition For A Writ of Certiorari
To The United States Court of Appeals
For the Second Circuit
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Appearing Pro Se
Uzamere Word Processing
& More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
cheryl .uzamere @uzamere
w_Qrdpr_QC.essing.net RECEIVED
AUG 1 3 2020
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
SUPREME COURT, II RQUESTIONS PRESENTED
The questions presented are:
1.
unconstitutional:
Whether New York State Law S2942—A is
a) Federal Courts find that New York State Law
S2942—A is unconstitutional.
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates the
Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs Act.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on Its
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et
al.
2.
Whether the circuit court’s and district court’s
decisions are in contravention of the Second Circuit’s
mandate concerning court corruption that was established in
Chevron v. Donziger.
3.
Whether the petitioner has the First
Amendment right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
viewpoint regarding the Babylonian Talmud’s espousal of
the worship of the god Molech, the god of pedophilia.
i
ui e z n oc u z a m
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner
Cheryl D. Uzamere, Individually and as Sole Proprietor
of Uzamere Word Processing & More
Respondents
New York State The Honorable
Pamela L. Fisher
The Honorable
Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor
New York State
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Letitia James
Attorney General
New York State
The Honorable
Janet Difiore
Chief Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Robin S. Garson
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Bernard J. Graham
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
nThe Honorable
Lawrence K. Marks
Chief Administrative Judge
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lara J. Genovesi
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lawrence Knipel
Administrative Judge
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Dawn Jimenez-Salta
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
The Honorable
Jeffrey Sunshine Matrimonial Kathy J. King
Practice Advisory and Rules Justice of the
Committee, Statewide
Kings County
Coordinating Judge for
Supreme Court
Matrimonial Cases
New York State
New York State
Unified Court System
Unified Court System
Susan Kaufman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Donald Kurtz
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
m
ui e z n oThe Honorable
Betty Weinberg Ellerin
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Sondra Miller
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jacqueline Silbermann
Honorary Chair Matrimonial
Practice Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Alton Abramowitz, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
IV
c u 2 a m
The Honorable
Carl Landicino
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Katherine A. Levine
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Richard J. Montelione
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Lisa S. Ottley
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemSusan L. Bender, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Roseann Branda, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Andrew Crecca
Justice of the Supreme Court,
Suffolk County Supervising
Judge of Matrimonial Matters
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Kathleen Donelli, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
v
uezn:
The Honorable
Mark Partnow
Justice of the
Kings County .
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michael Pesce
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Eric Prus
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Karen B. Rothenberg
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court Systemc u z a m
The Honorable
The Honorable
Laura A. Drager
Leon Ruchelsman
Acting Justice of the Supreme Justice of the
Court New York County,
Kings County Supreme
Matrimonial Practice
Court
Advisory and Rules
New York State
Committee
Unified Court System
New York State
Unified Court System
Donna England, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Stephen J. Gassman, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen Gesmer
Associate Justice
Appellate Division for the
First Department
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wayne P. Saitta
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Kenneth Sherman
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Debra Silber
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
viThe Honorable
Cheryl A. Joseph
Acting Supreme Court Justice
Supreme Court, Suffolk
County, Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Elena Karabatos, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Jeffrey D. Lebowitz
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Christopher S. Mattingly Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Vll
meznj
The Honorable
Martin Solomon
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Ellen M. Spodek
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court for The New
York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable Marsha
L. Steinhardt Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Peter P. Sweeney
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemMichael A. Mosberg Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Hemalee J. Patel, Esq.,
Referee of the Supreme Court
Richmond County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Florence Richardson Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Yesenia Rivera, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
vm
c u z a m
The Honorable Delores
J. Thomas Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Wavny Toussaint
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
David B. Vaughan
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Richard
Velasquez Justice of
the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court SystemThe Honorable
Emily Ruben
Family Court Judge
Queens County
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Sharon Kelly Sayers, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Carolyn
E. Wade Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Zenith T. Taylor, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Eric A. Tepper, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Edgar G. Walker
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Michelle Weston
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Paul Wooten
Justice of the
Kings County Supreme
Court
New York State
Unified Court System
IX
uezn:c u 2 a m
Bruce J. Wagner, Esq.
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Michael McSweeney
New York City Clerk
of the Council
Harriet Weinberger, Esq.,
Matrimonial Practice
Advisory and Rules
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
Patrick L. Synmoie
Executive Agency
Counsel
New York City
Clerk’s Office
The Honorable
Howard A. Zucker
Hope Zimmerman Justice of M.D., J.D.,
the Supreme Court, Nassau Commissioner
County Matrimonial Practice New York State
Advisory and Rules
Department of Health
Committee
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Rachel A. Adams
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Richard Zahnleuter
General Counsel
New York State
Department of Health
xThe Honorable
Sylvia G. Ash
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Loren Baily-Schiffman
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Johnny Lee Baynes
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable
Reginald A. Boddie
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Andrew M. Saul
Commissioner
Social Security
Administration
Royce B. Min
General Counsel
Social Security
Administration
Monica Chyn
Social Security
Admini stration
Gail Ennis ■
Inspector General
Social Security
Administration
xi
uisznsThe Honorable
Theresa Ciccotto
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Lissette Colon
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
The Honorable Matthew
D’Emic Justice of the
Kings County Supreme Court
New York State Unified
Court System
The Honorable
Jeanine Edwards
Justice of the
Kings County
Supreme Court
New York State
Unified Court System
Xll
cuzam
Ellen Sovern
Regional General
Counsel, Regional II
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe7“Jane Doe,
Office Manager, Social
Security District Office
3386 Crescent Street,
Brooklyn, New York,
Social Security
Administration
“John Doe”/“Jane Doe,
Office Manager
Social Security
District Office
Social Security
Administration
“Jane Doe”
, a.k.a. “Ms.
Flores, Pass Cadre
Worker, Supervisor,
Social Security District
Office
Social Security
Administrationc u z a m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS xiv
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES xxi
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1
OPINIONS BELOW 1
JURISDICTION 1
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
PROVISIONS……………………………………… 1
INTRODUCTION 5
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 15
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION 27
I. New York State Law
Unconstitutional:……………..
S2942—A is
27
a) Federal Courts find that New York State
Law S2942—A is unconstitutional…………. 27
b) New York State’s Law S2942—A Violates
the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Hobbs
Act 28
xivi
c) New York State Abrogated the
Fourteenth Amendment Regarding Age
and Race Based on Its Enforcement of the
Israel Anti-Boycott Law……………………….. 28
d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of
Genocide against Palestinians and New
York State’s Acts of Genocide against Black
People are under federal scrutiny in the
case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin
Netanyahu, etal.……………………………………. 30
II.
The Circuit Courts and District Court’s
Decision are in Contravention of the Second
Circuit’s Mandate concerning Court
Corruption that was established in Chevron
v. Donziger.…………………………………………..……
32
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment
Right to advise this Court of Jehovah’s
Viewpoint……………………………………………………
35
CONCLUSION
39
APPENDIX A
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3825-cv dated April 10, 2020 3
U.S. Court of Appeals
19-3402-cv dated October 24, 2019 4
U.S. District Court Bar Order
19-cv-9064…………………………… 5-7
U.S. District Court Dismissal
19-cv-9064………………………….. 8-12
xv
ui u z n oi
c u 2 a m
APPENDIX B
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 108b,
footnote 34……………………………………………………………. 5
Artsot Ha-Hayyim, pages 52a/52b 8
Midrash Rabbah, Vol. 1, page 293 11
Legends of the Jews, Vol. page 169
The Curse of Drunkenness………… 13
Come and Hear, Sex with Children
by Talmud Rules………………………… 15
History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties in a
Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra-Orthodox Males
with Pedophilia……………………………………………….. 40
News Punch — News Punch — Netanyahu To Release
Evidence of a Pedophile in Washington DC…………… 48
Veterans Today, Larry King, Overachiever 54
Haaretz, A Nation of Pedophiles 66
Haaretz, Defying a Conspiracy of Silence about
Pedophilia…………………………..………………………. 68
Haaretz, Israel Become a Refuge for Pedophiles
Warns Advocate for Child Sex Abuse…………….. 69
Haaretz, Israel Admits Ethiopian Women Were
Given Birth Control Shots…………………………….. 70
The Truth about Prostitution in Israel 71
xviThe Haredim (Orthodox Jews) Who Crowd Tel Aviv
Brothels……………………………………………………………… 72
Tikum Olam: The Ringworm Scandal: When Israeli
Doctors Killed Tens of Thousands of Arab Jewish
Children…………………………………………………………….. 77
Tikun Olam: Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies
Murdered in Medical Experiments, Abducted from
Parents, and Exploited in Paid National Institutes of
Health Experiments……………………………………..…………. 81
Telesur: 59,000 Palestinian Children Physically
Abused by Israel…………………………………………… 86
Monoweiss: Baltimore is Here; Ethiopian Jews
Protest Police Brutality in Jerusalem………….. 87
Anadolu Agency: Ethiopian Jews Suffer Racism in
Israel………………………………………………………………… 90
Personal Representative to the Dawabsheh Family v.
Benjamin Netanyahu……………………………………………. 91
The Ten Stages of Genocide 271
APPENDIX C
David P. Walker’s Facebook Statement 6
Tara A. Uzamere’s Affidavit and Exhibits 7
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Affidavit 11-12
xvn
iu e z n oI
\
c u z a m
New York State Department of Health/New York City
Clerk Marriage License Bureau Groom-Identity-
Lacking Marriage Certificate/License…………………….. 13
New York State Department of Health Father-
Identity-Lacking Birth Certificate………………… 14
1-130 Falsified Immigration Form 15
1-214 Complaint Form to Immigration and
Naturalization Service…………………………... 16-19
Attorney Osato Eugene Uzamere Falsified
Affirmation…………………………………………….. 20-21
Ehigie Uzamere Falsified Affidavit
(Posing as “Godwin E. Uzamere”)… 22-27
Respondent Honorable Justice Jeffrey Sunshine
Interlocutory Decision, page 9…………………………. 28
Respondent Honorable Jeffrey Sunshine
Decision Regarding Identity of Petitioner’s
Husband Ehigie Uzamere……………………….. 29-30
FOIA Response from U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services Regarding Identity of
Ehigie Uzamere with Exhibits…………………. 31-33
General Docket Sheet for Docket No. 19-3402
as of Julyl2, 2020……………………………………… 34-38
Order of Dismissal/Show Cause with
Superimposed Date October 17, 2010
38-43
Petitioner’s Notice on Record of Appeal dated
October 17, 2019…………..……………………………. 44-48
XVlllPetitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Declaration of Motion to Withdraw Court’s
Fraudulent Sua Sponte Notice of Interlocutory
Appeal Docket No. 19-3402 dated
October 22, 2019……………………………………………. 49-185
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York, Case No. 19-3402……………………..
186
Order for Cheryl D. Uzamere v. The State of
New York with Mandate for Case No. 19-3402 187
General Docket Sheet for Docket 19-3825 188-196
Docket Notice and Notice of Appeal for
Docket 19-3825 (pages 1-5) Dated
November 13, 2019…………………………… 197-201
Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
and Certificate of Services dated
December 16, 2019…………………………….. 202-203
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement and
Affidavit/Declaration in Support of Motion
Dated December 16, 2019……………………………… 204-205
Petitioner’s Brief, Page 1 dated
December 16, 2019………………… 206
Letter from Benjamin Torrance dated
January 6, 2020……………………………… 207-208
Letter from Oren L. Zeve dated
January 6, 2020…………………….
209-211
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief dated
January 15, 2020……………………………………… 212
xix
I
1
ui e z n a
!\
c u z
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix A
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 213
Petitioner’s Response and Reply Brief Appendix B
Dated January 15, 2020 …………………………………….. 214
Petitioner’s Combined Amended Response
And Reply and Motion in Support dated
January 15, 2020…………………………………… 215
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
dated January 21, 2020…………………………………… 216
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix A dated January 21, 2020………………… 217
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix B dated January 21, 2020………………… 218
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix C dated January 21, 2020………………… 219
Petitioner’s Amended Response and Reply Brief
Appendix D dated January 21, 2020……………….. 220
Petitioner’s Motion Information Statement
and Combined Amended Affidavit in Support
dated January 31, 2020……………………………… 221
xxTABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District 27
Bryan v. Moore
7, 35
Bulloch v. United States,
763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985) 21, 32
Chevron v. Donziger 1, 21, 32, 33, 34
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive
Health, et al., 462 U.S. 416, 103 S. Ct. 2481; 76 L.
Ed. 2d 687……………………………………………………….. 1, 21, 32,
Federal Communications Commission, v. Fox
Television Stations, 10-1293, 567 U.S. 239, 132 S.
Ct. 2307; 183 L. Ed. 2d 234; 2012 WL 2344462;
2012 U.S. LEXIS 4661;…………………………………….. 21
Johnson v. United States, 13-7120, 576 U.S. 591,
135 S. Ct. 2551; 192 L. Ed. 2d 569;………………..…. 21
Jordahl v. Brnovich 21
Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968) 21,32
Kolender, et al. v. Edward Lawson , 461 U.S. 352,
103 S. Ct. 1855; 75 L. Ed. 2d 903………………………. 21
Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1007 (2018) 21
Margaret Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville,
70-5030, 405 U.S. 156, 92 S. Ct. 839; 31 L. Ed. 2d
110; 1972…………………………………………………………….. 21
xxi
ui e z n o
i
ic u z a m
Personal Representative of the Dawabsheh
Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
etal.……………………………………………………….i, 15, 17, 22, 30
Sessions v. Dimaya\ 15-1498, 584 U.S., 138 S. Ct.
1204; 200 1. L. Ed. 2d 549; 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2497 22
Uzamere v. Allen E. Kaye, P.C., l:09-CV-3506,
S.D.N.Y. April 2, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 09-
1600-cv (2d Cir. June 24, 2009), cert, denied, 558
U.S. 965 (Oct. 13, 2009)…..………………………………. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Cuomo, No. ll-CV-2831 (E.D.N.Y. June
22, 2011), appeal dismissed, No. 11-2713-cv (2d Cir.
Nov. 28, 2011), cert denied, 565 U.S. 1264 (Mar. 19,
2012)………………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. Rice, No. 08-CV-0891 (NGG)
(E.D.N.Y. July 6, 2007)……………………….. 22, 33
Uzamere v. United States, No. 13-505S, 2013 WL
5781216 (D.R.I. Oct. 25, 2013), affd, No.13-2454 (1st
Cir. Apr. 11, 2014), cert, denied, 135 S. Ct. 451 (Nov.
3, 2014)……………………………………………………………….. 22, 33
Village of Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside,
Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 102 S. Ct.
1186; 71 L. Ed. 2d………………………………………………. 22
Constitutional Provisions
U.S. Const. Article VI, Section 2
Supremacy Clause…………………. 2, 7, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. I .1,2, 5, 7, 15,
22, 23, 27, 25
XXIIU.S. Const. Amend. V (Due Process) 2, 3, 14, 32
U.S. Const. Amend. XIII 2
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV (Due Process) 1, 3,
12, 14, 15, 28, 32
i
Statutes, Regulations, and Rules
18 U.S.C. § 873, blackmail, RICO 26
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 26, 33
18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B), domestic terrorism 23
18 U.S.C. § 1503, obstruction of justice 23
18 U.S.C. § 872, extortion 23
18 U.S.C. § 1951, Hobbs Act extortion 5, 23
28 U.S.C. § 1254(1) 1
Americans with Disabilities Act 15
Civil Rights Act of 1964 23
New York State Domestic Relations Law § 236 23
New York State Executive Law No. 157
16, 23
New York State Sessions Law S2942—A
(The Act) 1, 14, 16 23, 27, 28
Texas House Bill 89
27
Violence Against Women Act 22
XXlll
iu e z n oc u z a m
7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, J 60.23 32
Other Authorities
Babylonian Talmud
Tractate Abodah Zarah, Folio 26b
(Law of Moser)………………………….. 11, 15
Tractate Kethuboth, Folio lib 10
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 64a 36
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 745, 108b 7, 24, 16
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 57a 9
Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a 9, 35
Com eandHear
New America, America’s New Government
Church……………………………………………………. 6, 9
Death Penalty and Talmud Law,
Sentence and Execution…………. 6
What About Gentiles
Co-existence:…………. 24
Informing on Fellow Jews Who Commit
Crimes………………………………………………. 11
Sex with Children by Talmud Rules 11
XXIVThe Benediction against the Minim
Lawrence Schiffman……………………. 9, 11
Guide to the Perplexed
Rabbi Moses Maimonides 7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, page 293 Birkat HaMinim
8, 16, 25
8, 16, 25
8
Holy Bible
Genesis 19:1-23
38
Leviticus 20:1
Leviticus 20:1-5
25, 36
25
Leviticus 20:14
25
Numbers 25 38
Judges 19-21
Amos 5:23
39
37
Acts 7:42-43
37
xxv
ui e z n ac u z a m
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Cheryl D. Uzamere, sole proprietor of Uzamere
Word Processing & More petitions this Court for a writ of
certiorari to review the judgment of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in this matter.
♦
OPINIONS BELOW
The decisions of the court of appeals is printed in
Appendix A (App. A) at 3a-4a. The district court’s opinions
are printed at App. A 5a-12a.
JURISDICTION
The court of appeals entered its judgment on April
10, 2020; this petition is therefore timely filed. This Court
has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1).
CONSTITUTIONAL AND
STATUTORY PROVISIONS
Article I, Section 8, the Commerce Clause of the United
States Constitution provides:
1. To regulate commerce with foreign nations,
and among the several states, and with the
Indian tribes;
2. To constitute tribunals inferior to the
Supreme Court;
1Article VI, Section 2, the Supremacy Clause of the
United States Constitution provides:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United
States…shall be the supreme Law of the
Land…
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law;
The Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
The Judicial power of the United States shall
not be construed to extend to any suit in law or
equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of
the United States by Citizens of another State,
or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
provides:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,
except as a punishment for crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
2
ui e z n o
ic u 2 a m
within the United States, or any place subject
to their jurisdiction.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution provides:
Section 1: nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.
Statutory Provisions
Civil Law
42JJ.S.C. §19_8_1,.Equal Rights Under the Law:
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United
States shall have the same right in every State
and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to
sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full
and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings
for the security of persons and property as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject
to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes,
licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no
other.
42JLI.S.C.§1983,CivilActionfor_DeprivatiQn_of
Rights
Every person who, under color of any statute,
ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any
State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen
of the United States or other person within the
jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any
3rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the
party injured in an action at law, suit in equity,
or other proper proceeding for redress, except
that in any action brought against a judicial
officer for an act or omission taken in such
officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall
not be granted unless a declaratory decree was
violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
Criminal Law
15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Law:
Every contract, combination in the form of trust
or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade
or commerce among the several states or with
foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every
person who shall make any contract or engage
in any combination or conspiracy hereby
declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of
a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be
punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if
a corporation, or, if any other person
$1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding
10 years, or by both said punishments, in the
discretion of the court.
18 U.S.C. § 1962, Racketeering-Influenced
C or rupt_organiz ation:
It shall be unlawful for any person through a
pattern of racketeering activity or through
collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or
maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in
or control of any enterprise which is engaged in,
or the activities of which affect, interstate or
foreign commerce.
4
ui e 2 n dl
\
\
cuzam
18U.S.C.§1951,Interferencejvith„Commerce
by ThreatsorViolenee
Whoever in any way or degree obstructs,
delays, or affects commerce or the movement of
any article or commodity in commerce, by
robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires to
do so, or commits or threatens physical violence
to any person or property in furtherance of a
plan or purpose to do anything in violation of
this section shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than twenty years, or
both.
18 U.S.C. § 3771, 18 U.S.C. § 10607(c), Crime
Victims’ Rights: A crime victim has the
following rights:
The right to be treated with fairness and with
respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.
¥
INTRODUCTION
“…Let me say first that a constitution, as
important as it is, will mean nothing unless the
people are yearning for liberty and freedom. If
the people don’t care, then the best constitution
in the world won’t make any difference. So, the
spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and
then the constitution
first, it should
safeguard basic fundamental human rights,
like our First Amendment, the right to speak
5freely, and to publish freely, without the
government as a censor.1,2
You should certainly be aided by all the
constitution-writing that has gone one since the
end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S.
constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in
the year 2012.”
Excerpt from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg interview with A1 Hayat TV in Egypt3
On November 5, 2002, nearly ten (10) years prior to
the publicized statement eschewing the U.S. Constitution
as a model for other countries to emulate, the National
Institute for Judaic Law celebrated its founding in the
building housing the U.S. Supreme Court. The gala …was
attended by 200 dinner guests, including justices from this
honorable Court.
Information regarding the gala was publicized by
Come and Hear, at the website entitled New America,
America’
s New Government Church.4
At the Come and Hear website, a chapter entitled
Death Penalty and Talmud Law, Sentence and Execution5
5, says:
I
I1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg;
2 https://www.memri.org/tv/us-supreme-court-justice-ruth-
baderginsburgegyptians-look-constitutions-south-africa-or-canada
3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg&t=3s
4 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html.
5 http://www.come-and-hear.eom/editor/capunish_l.html#n7
1
6
w p z n o1
c u z a in
SupremeCourtConsidersTalmudic Law
“In December 1999, the United States
Supreme Court set a precedent by accepting
for consideration an amicus [curiae] brief in a
death penalty case (Bryan v. Moore)…the brief
was based wholly on Talmud law.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
prohibits the favoring and/or establishment of any religion
in governmental settings. Governmental reliance on
religion, no matter how well-intentioned, is disingenuous
on its face because it violates the Supremacy Clause of the
U.S. Constitution.
The public is unaware of Babylonian Talmudic
dogma that is discriminatory and deadly to people of
African descent, Gentiles, children and especially
whistleblowers:
HatredofPeopleofAfricanDescent6
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio p. 745, 108b: „Our Rabbis taught: …
Ham was smitten in his skin.“ (This is
footnoted, and the footnote reads: „I.e., from
him was descended Cush (the negro), who is
black-skinned.“
Rabbi Moses Maimonides (RamBam), Guide
to the Perplexed: “[T]he Kushites (Negroes)
found in the remote South… rank lower than
the rank of man but higher than the rank of
apes. For they have the external shape and
lineaments of a man and a faculty of
http://_wjv_w_.ottmalLcom/mj_ht_arch/v_15/mj_vl5i20.html#jCDX
7discernment that is superior to that of the
apes.7
Artsot Ha-Hayyim: “the reason Abraham
Lincoln was killed was because he freed the
blacks, this is also the reason why Kennedy
was killed, i.e. because he was good to the
blacks. He continues by saying that this will
be the fate of any who adopt a progressive
attitude towards blacks, because they are
meant to be enslaved.
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
„AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN
(Breishit 9:25): (Commentary omitted) …R.
Huna also said in R. Joseph’s name: You [i.e.
Noah is speaking to Ham) have prevented me
from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed
will be ugly and dark-skinned. R. Chiyya said:
Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark
therefore, Ham came forth black-skinned
while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.“
Hatred of Christians
Birkat HaMinin (Curse against Christians):
…Let the nozerim and the minim be destroyed
in a moment. And let them be blotted out of
the Book of Life and not be inscribed together
with the righteous. Blessed art thou, O Lord,
who humblest the arrogant.“
7 https://www.sefaria.org/Guide_for_the_Perplexed%2C_Part_3.5171an
g=bi
8
ui e z n oc u z a m
Professor Lawrence H. Schiffman: …These
passages present evidence that some version
of the benediction was already recited in the
mid-second century C.E. and that it included
explicit reference to the Christians.8
ComeandHear, New_Ameriea,_America’s_N_ew
GovernmentChurch9
The Noahide Laws promise deadly
consequences for Christians… LORD God
tasked the Jews to enforce the seven Noahide
Commandments, and to enforce them with
liberal use of the death penalty.
EspQusaloftheSlaughterofGentiles
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin,
Folio 57a: ‚For murder, whether of a Cuthean
by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean,
punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by
an Israelite, there is no death penalty‘?10
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama,
Folio 113a: ‚Where a suit arises between an
Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the
former according to the laws of Israel, justify
him and say: ‚This is our law‘; so also if you
can justify him by the laws of the heathens
justify him and say [to the other party:] ‚This
is your law‘; but if this cannot be done, we use
subterfuges to circumvent him.11
8 http://lawrenceschiffman.com/the-benediction-against-the-minim/
9 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_l.html
10 https://halakhah.com/sanhedrin/_sanhedrin_5_7_.html
11 https://halakhah.com/babakamma/babakamma
113.html
_
9Death Penalty and the Babylonian Talmud12
…Talmud law insists on unequal justice
under law. Talmudic law holds there is one
law for Jews, and one for Gentiles. This is not
inconsistent
with the Old
Testament…Gentiles are the proper slaves of
Jews.
Co-existence?13
What does the future hold? Can the Jews ever
co-exist with the rest of humanity? The
answer is „yes,“ provided the rest of humanity
accepts the role designed for them by Jewish
leadership. If Gentiles do not accept
enslavement, there will be conflict.
The Worship of Molech and Pedophilia
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth,
Folio lib: GEMARA: … When a grown-up
man has intercourse with a little girl it is
nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it
is as if one puts the finger into the eye…»14
12 http://w_w_w_.come-and-hear.com/editor/cap.unish_4.html
13 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/gentile.html
14 https ://halakhah.com/kethuboth/kethuboth_l 1 .html
10
ui e z n dc u z a m
Come and Hear, Sex with Children by Talmud
Rules:15 Again, there is no prohibition of a
sexual practice that would almost certainly
cause physical damage to a young girl due to
the mismatched sizes of genitals between an
adult’s penis and a child’s vagina or anus.
In the Talmud, grown men are permitted to
have sexual intercourse with female babies and
children, and homosexual relations with boys
younger than nine.
Sentence
of Death
for
Christian/Minim,
__
__
__
Apostates and Whistleblowers/Mosrim16
R. Abbahu recited to R. Johanan: ‚Idolaters and
[Jewish] shepherds of small cattle need not be
brought up though they must not be cast in, but
minim, informers, and apostates may be cast
in, and need not be brought up.
Michael J. Broyde, Esq., Co-Directors of National
Institute for Judaic Law’s Inaugural Project17 expounded on
Zarah 26b’s
Abodah prohibition against
whistleblowing/meshira in his speech entitled “Informing on
Fellow Jews Who Commit Crimes18:
… the Talmud recounts – in a number of places
– that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the
secular government, even when their conduct is
a violation of secular law and even when their
conduct is a violation of Jewish law.
15 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
16 The Curse against Christians,
http://lawrenceschifrman.com/thebenediction-againstrthe-minim
17http://nijLorg/contactJitml
18 http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/moser-broyde/index.html
11As of the writing of this petition, the petitioner’s
children are victims of sexual violence by respondent New
York State’s foster care system. They have never been
heard, and the petitioner’s attempts to seek justice on
behalf of her children has been successfully rebuffed by
members of the Ashkenazi community’s legal and judicial
community for several decades. The groom-identity-
lacking marriage affidavit containing the fictitious name
“Godwin E. Uzamere” that the petitioner’s husband and his
attorneys submitted to respondent New York State’s
Department of Health, New York City Clerk’s Marriage
License Bureau and the U.S. Department of Justice’s
Immigration and Naturalization Service were criminally
used as an identification document to produce a falsified
marriage license; a falsified birth certificate; a falsified
request for immigration status; and decades of the
petitioner’s receipt of public assistance from respondent New
York State based on its acceptance of the groom-
identification-lacking marriage affidavit that successfully
removed the petitioner’s husband as financial protector from
the then-pregnant petitioner and her children.
Additionally, in spite of the district court’s, the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security’s and the respondent
New York State appellate court’s recognition of
petitioner’s husband as the former Nigerian Senator
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, the respondent New York State’s
Department of Health and its political subdivision New
York City Clerk’s Marriage License Bureau have
vehemently refused to correct their records to reflect
petitioner and her daughter’s rightful marital and
consanguineous
relationship to their African relative,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
Respondent New York State has normalized the
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause’s extension, the Civil Rights Act that prohibits age
discrimination by allowing the ritualized fellating of
12
ui e z n 3c u z a m
helpless Ashkenazi boys during bris, such that in the City
of New York, eleven (11) Ashkenazi baby boys have
contracted herpes, with two (2) of them dying.19 There has
been an upsurge of the killings of unarmed people of
African descent by law enforcement officers across the
country. Although Chinese citizens and the Chabad
Lubavitch were exposed to COVID-19 during the outbreak
in Wuhan, American citizens of African descent are now
listed as being disproportionately affected because of
issues associated with anti-black racism, with the vast
majority of people still not knowing that anti-Hamite/anti-
Canaanite/anti-African hatred is a defamatory religious
teaching associated with the Babylonian Talmud.
This country is now in the grips of the enforcement
of Israel anti-boycott laws. Israel’s prime minister has: 1)
called for the enforcement of the Babylonian Talmud; 2)
threatened U.S. politicians with exposing those who
engaged in sex with children; but, 3) has withheld the
identities of those U.S. politicians Israel’s prime minister
claims had sex with children from the parents, who like
the petitioner, are worried sick about the effects of rape on
their children, and are victims of the intentional infliction of
emotional distress associated with the inability to obtain
justice for their children because of the respondents’
single-minded determination to support Israel’s Ashkenazi-
led government.
As of the completion of this petition, the petitioner
alleges that the respondents have made themselves
unavailable for service by electronic means – as suggested by
this Court. The respondents have refused to comply with
petitioner’s request for return receipt for e-mail sent to them.
https://_ww_w.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmv/rhtml/mm6122a2.htm7.s_cids
mm6122a
13With the assistance of the district and circuit courts,
the petitioner is again forcibly relegated to the position of a
helpless, nonconsenting sex slave to mimic the sexually
sadistic domestic terrorism, sexual harassment, sexual
predation and psychological gang-rape to which the
respondents subjected the petitioner’s children after
facilitating the use of the fictitious name “Godwin E.
Uzamere” to remove the petitioner’s husband as a financial
protector for the petitioner and her children. The petitioner
also alleges that based on a long-term pattern of behavior
associated with members of the Ashkenazi community who
are jurists, there is a disproportionately high percentage of
them who are pedophile-oriented sexually sadistic predators,
who, when adjudicating the lawsuits of unprotected self-
represented litigants, especially in forma pauperis litigants,
create any legal ruse to use their positions of power
psychologically “gang-rape” helpless pro se litigants20.
The petitioner seeks to avail herself of the benefits
of the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy, Freedom of Speech,
Establishment, Religion, Petition, Due Process and Equal
Protection clauses, and to allow the petitioner to present
her request for certiorari with the openness of which the
attendees of the founding of the National Institute for
Judaic Law availed themselves. More importantly, this
petition seeks to connect respondent New York State’s
enforcement of S2942—A, the Israel Anti-Boycott Law to
20 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Sexual Sadism
Disorder
Diagnostic
Criteria
302.84 ’ (F65.52)
(https://mrkmnls.co/2XtKlgi) Over a period of at least 6 months,
recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological
suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or
behaviors…The diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are
intended to apply both to individuals who freely admit to having such
paraphilic interests and to those who deny any sexual interest in the
physical or psychological suffering of another individual despite
substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
14
ui e z n oc u z a m
the unconstitutional enforcement
Talmud’s Law of Moser.
of the Babylonian
To that end, the petitioner has, in addition to
availing herself of her First Amendment right to petition
the government for a redress of grievances, has further
exercised her First Amendment right to free speech by
informing the members of the European Union and the
African Union of the existence of this petition before filing
it with this honorable Court, as well as members of the
international Hamitic/Canaanite/African community, to
expose the havoc that the continued interference of the
Babylonian Talmud has wrought, and in particular, the
havoc that children of Hamitic/Canaanite/African descent
have suffered, who petitioner alleges like her son, were
gang-raped as a result of the enforcement of the
Babylonian Talmudic Law of Moser, which the petitioner
alleges has now been politicized into the New York State
Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Cheryl D. Uzamere, the petitioner, is a member of
several groups that are protected by federal statutes that
invoke the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause. She is an African American. She is a woman. She
is one of Jehovah’s Witnesses and a servant of the true god,
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ; and hater of Molech, the god of pedophilia, sexual
pervasion associated with pedophilia and child sacrifice.
She was diagnosed as having bipolar disorder, an organic
mental condition in February 1993, that is recognized as a
disability pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act,
and for which she has received Social Security Disability
Insurance retroactively since 1996. She is the mother of
David Paul Walker and Tara Ann Uzamere, African
American children who are victims of sexually sadistic
15terrorism by respondents New York State and New York
City’s Babylonian Talmud-based foster care system, and
who were kidnapped and trafficked by respondent State of
New York and City of New York for purposes of the
Babylonian Talmud/Molech-fomented trafficking of
humans for the sex trade and kidnapping and trafficking
of boys of African descent for anal sodomy. She is an
individual against whom the extrajudicial sentence of
death has been ordered pursuant to the Babylonian
Talmudic crime of meshira/mesira (whistleblowing), a
religious law that is now politicized and legalized by New
York State Executive Order No. 157 and the New York
State Legislative Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A
regarding boycotting Israel.
Based on those matters in which she was personally
involved, and on information and belief as to all other
matters, she makes the following statements under
penalty of perjury.
Statement of Petitioner’s Son, David Paul Walker’s
Sexual Abuse While a Client at JCCA-Edenwald Group
Home
The petitioner became aware of the incident
described below sometime during 2018. The petitioner’s
son, David Paul Walker described an occasion where, while
he was six years old, he was in a setting where the
employees of JCCA-Edenwald did not supervise the
sleeping area, nor provide security cameras or security
guards to ensure that her son’s or other foster children
were safe, in what she alleges was an attempt to hide their
goals of allowing Babylonian Talmud-adherent, sex-crazed
members of the Ashkenazi Jewish community to engage in
the Babylonian Talmudic practice of anally sodomizing the
petitioner’s son:
16
ui e z n Dc u z a m
“Please Mr. Don’t touch me there, I’m only
six…love you not, hate you a lot, Shall we
commence to crucifix???… When I was a little
boy, teenage boy masturbated in front of me,
then politely ask me to lick???… “If you come
near me, I’ll scream”
, First time seeing
someone else’s dick… So easy to pass
judgment, tell everybody else what to do…Say
stranger, my advice but your ass, shall we
suffer together for a spell or two??? Disturbed
by the vacant lifeless expression in my eyes
yes
??? of
Systematic
rape my
soul…prolonged torture of my mind, please
my darling. I wholeheartedly invite you to try
your best…
Statement of Petitioner’s Daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere
That Was Ignored By New York State Supreme Court
Justice Jeffrey S. Sunshine:
The petitioner’s daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere, now a
registered nurse with the State of New York for over 10
years, submitted a New York State-notarized affidavit in
which she described Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, at that time a
senator for the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as her father:
I, Tara A. Uzamere, being duly sworn,
depose and say that:
1) I am the daughter of the Plaintiff
and the Defendant in the above-entitled action.
2) following facts:
I make this Affidavit based on the
3) That the Plaintiff has always told
me that Defendant is my father ever since I was
a child.
174) That I met the Defendant for the first
time at JFK Airport in Jamaica, New York
around the year 2004 to the best of my
recollection.
5)
That I took a photograph of the
Defendant during the aforesaid visit.
Photograph taken at JFK Airport is hereby
attached as Exhibit A.
6) That on the day that I first met the
Defendant at JFK Airport, I called my friend
Eusi Patterson on the cell phone that I used to
take a photograph of the Defendant.
7)
That on the aforesaid day the
Defendant openly and notoriously introduced
himself to Eusi as my father.
8) That I met and visited the
Defendant’s late brother, John Uzamere at 476
Amboy Street.
9) That the Defendant and his
brother George Uzamere openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at 489 Ray
Street, Freeport, New York.
10)
That while I was a resident in
Freeport, New York, I experienced a car
accident, and that George Uzamere and the
Defendant openly and notoriously sent checks
to pay the rest of my car note to Drive
Financial, a financing company based in
Dallas, Texas.
18
uiezn:c u z a m
11) That the Defendant openly and
notoriously visited me when I lived at Nichol
Road in Wyandanch, New York.
12) That the Defendant met my
landlord, Martin Marta when the Defendant
visited me while I was living at the aforesaid
address.
13) That during the aforesaid meeting
the Defendant openly and notoriously
identified himself to my landlord as my father.
14) That I spoke with Wellington
Uzamere on the telephone several times before
and after I first met the Defendant.
15) That Wellington Uzamere
referred to the Defendant as „Ehigie.“
16) That based on information
received from members of the Edo/Bini
community as well as my own belief, my facial
structure resembles that of the Defendant as
evidenced in my photograph hereby attached as
Exhibit B.
17) That while I spend three or four
pleasant occasions with the Defendant and
received monetary gifts during those occasions,
the Defendant has never been a consistent part
of my life as I explained in the report [that] I
provided to Nigerian newspaper Huhu Online.
See aforesaid report hereby attached as Exhibit
C.
1918) That based on what I learned at
Long Island College School of Nursing
regarding psychiatric nursing and psychiatric
illnesses, as well as personal day-to-day
observation of the Plaintiff, that while the
Plaintiffs predominate affect is consistent with
what I believe to be hypomania, the Plaintiff is
not psychotic and does not require
hospitalization, as untruthfully implied by
Eugene
Uzamere’s defamatory
characterization of the Plaintiff as „certifiably
insane“ to Nigerian newspaper Point Blank
News Online, hereby attached as Exhibit D.
19) That before 2004 the Defendant
never visited me; never celebrated a birthday
with me; never kissed me; never told me he
loved me; never wiped away my tears; never
talked to me about God; never attended a house
of God with me; never read me a Bible story;
never talked to me about how to comport myself
around men or the importance of being a chaste
woman; never let other men know that I was
precious to him; never let other men know that
they would be responsible to him if they hurt
me; never held my hand; never walked with me;
never sat me on his lap; never played games
with me; never took me to the movies; never
picked me up; never gave me a hug; never
attended a school meeting with my teachers;
never visited me in the hospital; never told me
he was proud of me; never accompanied me to a
father/daughter dance, never attended a
graduation; never invited other members of the
Edo/Bini community to a naming ceremony in
honor of my birth; never told me that he was
glad I was born and never treated me like he
loved me and wanted to protect me from the
20
ui e 2 n ocuzam
dangers of the world the way normal fathers do
with their daughters, and especially in the
manner that Nigerian men are known to treat
their children.
20) That the falsely concocted
„counter-affidavit“ and the falsely concocted
affirmation by Eugene Uzamere makes me
feel heartsick because I have always been
made to believe by the Plaintiff, the
Defendant and members of the Defendant’s
family that the Defendant is my father and
that being a blood member of the Uzamere
clan, a blood member of the proud and ancient
Edo/Bini nation and culture and being a
native Nigerian based on consanguinity are
my birthrights and a part of who I am; that the
aforesaid „counter-affidavit and attorney’s
affirmation are emotionally and psychologically
abusive as they suggest that I am a bastard
child while the Defendant is not willing to end
the question of paternity by taking a simple
DNA test.
21) That I now experience financial
difficulties such that I do not have money to
return to college to continue studying nursing,
and that because of the Plaintiffs advanced age
and disability, it is very difficult for her to
obtain employment to help me pay for college;
PELL grant rejection information is attached at
Exhibit E.
22) That I am willing to submit myself
for honest DNA testing to confirm that the
Defendant is my father if conditions can be
controlled so that the Defendant does not know
and cannot access the location of the laboratory
21where said DNA test is performed so that the
Defendant does not unduly influence anyone to
lie about the results of the DNA test as it seems
the Defendant was able to do on the marriage
affidavit where the municipal clerk signed
his/her name to indicate that he/she verified
the Defendant’s age, but that on inspection of
said page, did not mark off any box to indicate
the type of identification the municipal clerk
used to verify the Defendant’s age and date of
birth and identity; see Plaintiffs Affidavit and
Application for License to Marry, top of back
page hereby attached as Exhibit F.
Wherefore, as the Defendant has forced
the Plaintiff and I to suffer domestic violence as
identified by the U.S. Justice Department’s
Office of Violence Against Women, I
respectfully ask that this Court considers that
the Plaintiff is not just pleading for herself but
for our entire family; that this Court grant the
Plaintiffs lawful and just request to dismiss
attorney
Eugene Uzamere’s falsified
affirmation in its entirety, and to grant the
Plaintiffs motion for default judgment and
money judgment in its entirety.
The basis of the petitioner’s request for a writ of
certiorari by this Court is the lower courts’ refusal of her
request for declaratory and injunctive relief. The
petitioner asked the lower courts for two things: 1) the
right to speak; and 2) for the lower court to prevent the
respondents from violating the petitioner’s First
Amendment right to speak. The response of both the
district court and the circuit court were “Plaintiff, we will
not allow you to speak about issues regarding the gang-
rape of your children, the falsified marriage-affidavit or
other issues contained in the 540 exhibits of your lawsuit.”
22
ui e z n oc u z a m
The petitioner requested the lower courts to grant
her First Amendment right to speak in court about, among
other things, the rape of her children. The Second Circuit,
a Sherman-Antitrust-violating, white supremacist,
Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi-led judicial
cartel where every U.S. attorney that received the
petitioner’s complaints are members of the Ashkenazim,
has consistently demonstrated to the petitioner that black
lives do not matter. The lower courts’ judiciary know that
with a disproportionate percentage of the Second Circuit’s
judiciary being members of a religion that teaches that
people of African descent are meant to be enslaved, that
the petitioner’s chances of being granted certiorari are
slim to none.
Pursuant to a recently enacted law, New York State
Law (Session 2017-2018) S2942—A, (“2942–A” or “the
Act”), the State of New York requires government
contractors to certify that they are not engaged in boycotts
of Israel or territories controlled by Israel.
The petitioner is the sole proprietor of a home-based
typing service. Over the course of several decades, the
respondents have sought to extort, defraud, and otherwise
torturously injure the petitioner by means of a plan they
conceived and executed against the petitioner and her
children. It has been continuously carried out a
racketeering-influenced criminal organization led by
members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi
leadership in positions of great power, among others,
immigration attorneys, Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro,
New York State Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey S.
Sunshine and other New York State Supreme Court
justices/judges, federal and municipal law enforcement
officers, Affinity Federal Credit Union; Metavante
Corporation; Verizon, Inc.; the New York City Housing
Authority; New York City Comptroller’s Office’s 50-H
23attorney Jane Barrett; New York City Department of
Information Technology and Telecommunication; the City
University of New York; the New York City Police
Department; Web.com; the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission; the Social Security
Administration; the New York State Attorney General’s
Office; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; New York
City Health and Hospitals Corporation; New York State
Office of Mental Health, Brookdale Hospital Medical
Center, Interfaith Medical Center; the National Credit
Union Administration, America Works, Inc.; Brooklyn
Defender, Inc.; Federal Defenders of Brooklyn; Federation
Employment and Guidance Services (FEGS); and other
governmental and nongovernmental employees under the
control of respondent New York State’s powerful
Ashkenazi leadership for whom the petitioner provided the
circuit court with irrefutable proof of embezzlement of the
petitioner’s SSDI funds; malicious prosecution; unlawful
imprisonment; medical malpractice; but against whom
respondent New York State and its subdivision New York
City have done nothing.
The petitioner alleges that the Act superficially
seeks to suppress participation in political boycott
campaigns aimed at Israel and/or territories controlled by
Israel, particularly Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions
(“BDS”) campaigns. These campaigns seek to apply
economic pressure on Israel to protest the Israeli
government’s treatment of Palestinians and occupation of
the Palestinian territories.
The petitioner alleges that the real purpose of the
Act is to facilitate what the Israeli scientific and public
health sectors, the Israel movie entitled Conventional Sins
and CBS Channel 2 News identify as a disproportionately
high percentage of Ashkenazi Jews who have a
predisposition for pedophilia, and to use the Babylonian
Talmud’s misinterpretation regarding the Holy Bible’s
24
Ui G Z n 0c u 7. a ra
identity of Ham and his son Canaanite as the religious
excuse to subject them to international sexualized
enslavement and tyranny the Jehovah God and the U.S.
Constitution forbid. The petitioner alleges that, based on
historical records: a) from the completion of the writing of
the Babylonian Talmud; b) to the Babylonian Talmud’s
promulgation of the inferiority of people of African descent;
c) to Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish
leadership’s monopolization of the African slave trade
where Africans, including their children were anally
sodomized; d) to Ashkenazi Jew-controlled Israel’s murder
of over 100,000 Arab-Jewish and Palestinian children
during the Ringworm Experiment; e) to Israel’s Knesset’s
acknowledgment of the Ashkenazi Jew-controlled
kidnapping, torturous experimentation and murder of
thousands of Yemeni Jewish children; f) to the Franklin
Scandal where children, predominately European boys
were removed from foster homes to be anally raped; g) to
the disproportionately high percentage of Ashkenazi
Jewish children who are fellated after circumcision, some
of who contracted herpes and died; h) to Jeffrey Epstein’s
numerous international forays for the purpose of raping
European American children; i) to New York State’s
warehousing of boys of African descent in distantly located
group homes where boys like my son, David Paul Walker
are anally sodomized; j) to Electric Intifada’s description
of Ashkenazi Jew-controlled weaponized rape of
Palestinians; k) to New York State’s immigration policy
that disproportionately admits individuals from South
Asia and the Middle East, parts of the world where the
institutionalized prostitution of children has been
normalized; 1) to Israel’s citizenry’s desperate attempts to
stop the flow of Ashkenazi Jewish pedophiles from using
Aliyah to escape prosecution in countries where they have
raped children, just to escape to Israel to rape children
there; the respondents have exhibited, not just a glaring
refusal to protect children, but an even more glaring
ability to create impoverished children who are trafficked
25and anally raped in its foster care system. The, petitioner
alleges that the respondents’ leaders are violent,
pedophilic sodomites, and that the BDS issue is a cover to
deflect attention from Ashkenazi Jewish’ leadership’s
organic predisposition for pedophilia.
Not only does the petitioner allege that respondent
New York State’s Anti-Boycott law is a cover for the
Ashkenazi community’s organic predisposition with
pedophilia and sexual sadism, the petitioner alleges that
the enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott law is a
violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1, Sherman Antitrust Act; 18
U.S.C. § 1961-1968 regarding obstruction, domestic
terrorism and Hobbs Act extortion; a violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 873 regarding blackmail; and is as much an act of
sexually sadistic domestic terrorism and psychological
torture as is Israel’s prime minister’s act of sexualized,
blackmail/psychological torture regarding his threat to
expose U.S. politicians who are pedophiles21 relating to the
fate of the missing Yemenite children of the 1950s22, while
intentionally inflicting emotional distress on the parents
of the children who Israel’s prime minister claims were
raped by withholding the names of those U.S. politicians
Israel’s prime minister claims raped children. –
21 Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile Ring —
Chinese https://bit.ly/3hHE0_Cy_.
22 Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies Murdered in Medical
Experiments, https://bit.ly/2ZwEitY.
26
uieznsi
c u z a m
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION
I. New York State Sessions Law S2942—A is
U nconstitutional.
a) Other Federal Courts Have Found that
the Israel Anti-Boycott Law is
U nconstitutional
In an article entitled Third Federal Court Rules
Anti-BDS Law Violates First Amendment3, the website
TheFire.org stated:
Last week, a federal court in Austin,
Texas issued an order blocking enforcement of
a state law dubbed Texas’ “anti-BDS bill” by
the governor. Texas House Bill 89, enacted in
2017, required government contractors to
certify that they do not and would not boycott
Israel while doing business with a state
entity.
The
order in Amawi v. Pflugerville
Independent School District granted the
preliminary injunction motions of five sole
proprietors in two consolidated lawsuits filed
in late 2018 by the ACLU and the Council on
American-Islamic Relations.
Last year, federal district courts in Kansas24 and
Arizona25 sustained First Amendment challenges and
issued injunctions against enforcement of the state laws.
23 Third federal court rules anti-BDS law violates First Amendment,
https://bit.ly/3hQ9MBS.
24 Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp.3d 1007 (2018)
25 Jordahl, et al v. Brnovich, et al, 18-16896
27b) Respondent New York State’s Sessions Law
S2942—A Violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
the Hobbs Act.
The petitioner alleges that enforcement of New York
State’s Israel Anti-Boycott law sets the stage for its own
undoing because it violates the Sherman Antitrust Act and
RICO law regarding the Hobbs Act.
The News Punch website published an article entitled
Netanyahu to Release Evidence of Washington Pedophile
Ring, the article states:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
just declassified 400,000 documents that
expose child trafficking and a child sex ring
in Washington.
Per se violations of the Sherman Antitrust law do not
allow justifications. Conversely, while per se acts cannot be
defended or justified, there are limited exceptions where
courts will instead apply the rule of reason.26 For example,
in Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 363 F 3d.
761 (8th Cir. 2004), the Eighth Circuit held that an
agreement between Ford and a trade association of
limousine converters to prevent the plaintiff from
advertising its products in the trade association publications
was motivated by safety concerns. Thus, the court applied
the rule of reason even though this was a (non-price)
horizontal conspiracy among competitors.
c) New York State Abrogated the Fourteenth
Amendment Regarding Age and Race Based on It
Enforcement of the Israel Anti-Boycott Law.
26 BonaLaw PC – Does the Group Boycott Violate Antitrust Laws
https://bit.ly/2Nop6aN
28
ui e z n oc u z a m
The website The Chronicle for Social Change
published an article dated February 27, 2019 entitled New
York City Confronts Massive Overrepresentation of Black
Children in Foster Care. The article states:
… the foster care system is expanding its efforts
to address longstanding disparities, especially
for black children whose presence in the system
is roughly double their share of the general
population.
…It’s part of ACS’ recent focus on “lifting the
value of racial disproportionality to the value of
safety and risk within our system,” says David
Peters, ACS’ head of the Office of Equity
Strategies (OES). That focus was prompted in
part by a legislative package De Blasio
signed in September of 2017, which mandated
training on implicit bias, discrimination and
structural inequity at city agencies.
…Fifty-three percent of the roughly 9,000
children in the city foster care system identified
as black in 2017, according to state data. Yet,
only around a quarter of all New Yorkers
younger than 18 are black.
The petitioner alleges that the implicit bias against
black children is directly related to the Babylonian Talmud’s
explicit dissemination of anti-black hatred, its espousal of
pedophilia and the Ashkenazi community’s organic
predisposition for pedophilia; however Babylonian Talmud-
adherent, Ashkenazi leadership has been as silent on these
religious doctrines just as nearly all other members of the
Ashkenazi community have done.
– 29d) Andrew Cuomo’s Aiding and Abetting of Genocide
against Palestinians and New York State’s Acts of
Genocide against Black People are under Federal
Scrutiny in the case Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu,
et al.
The lawsuit entitled Personal Representative of the
Dawabsheh Family, et al v. Benjamin Netanyahu, et al,
makes the following statements:
For most Americans, the concepts relied upon
by the Palestinian Plaintiffs in this case (i.e.
ethnic cleansing, genocide, denationalization,
and dehumanization) are foreign concepts not
part of normal American vernacular. However,
these concepts are as American as apple pie.
The indigenous American Indian population
and the African slaves brought to America have
been victimized by these identical war crimes.
Each group has been subject to ethnic
cleansing, genocide, expropriation of private
property, confinement to reservations and
ghettos, wholesale denial of their fundamental
freedoms, subjected to a biased criminal justice
system, and deemed to be irrelevant and
disenfranchised members of American society.
Like Palestinian-Americans these groups can
file their own war crime lawsuits here in federal
district court. The reasons: (a) the similarity of
injuries sustained (wanton destruction of
property, starvation diets, and poisoning of
water wells and livestock); (b) the identical
means employed to subjugate these groups
(The New York Police Department murdered
Amadou Diallo with 51 bullets and Mr. Shapira
used 87 bullets to massacre 29 Palestinians);
30
iii e 2 n oc u z a m
/
and (c) for over 400 years, they have been
victims of an ethnic cleansing/genocidal
campaign similar to the one started by
Defendant PMN in 1998. See U.S. State
Department Manual on the 10 Stages of
Genocide, Exhibit B.
With respect to the role that Defendant Cuomo
played in terms of denationalization, he has not
directly funded international terrorists.
However, along with his hero, Defendant
Hikind, he has deprived 195 million Americans
in thirty-six different states of the right to
support the Palestinian cause and criticize
PMN’s campaign to denationalize the
Palestinian population…On behalf of the
Israeli government, not his New York state
constituency (which rejected the anti-BDS
legislation), Defendant Cuomo convinced forty
governors to enact an unconstitutional
executive order criminalizing the anti-Boycott,
Divestiture, and Sanction movement
[hereinafter BDS].
The New York State anti-BDS legislation
violated fundamental liberties cherished by
Americans, e.g. their right to criticize a foreign
country’s human rights record. That legislation
requires US. citizens to sign what amounts to
loyalty oaths to Israel. It has had a serious
chilling effect on freedom of speech and interstate
commerce (italics added). The Israeli
spokespersons in charge of this program and
tasked with convincing their fellow Americans
that Palestinians are “savages” not deserving of
their own state are Defendants Cuomo and
Hikind, even though they are not registered as
Israeli agents under the Federal Agent
31Registration Act 22 U.S.C. 611 (hereinafter
FARA).
II.
The Circuit Court’s and District Court’s Decision
is in Direct Contravention of Its Own Mandate
concerning Court Corruption that was
established in Chevron v. Donziger.
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121
(10th Cir. 1985), the court stated „Fraud upon the court is
fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and
is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents,
false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a
member is corrupted or influenced or influence is
attempted or where the judge has not performed his
judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of
the court have been directly corrupted.”
“Fraud upon the court“ has been defined by the 7th
Circuit Court of Appeals to „embrace that species of fraud
which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a
fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the
judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its
impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for
adjudication.“ Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7
Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ‘I 60.23. The 7th
Circuit further stated: „a decision produced by fraud upon
the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never
becomes final.“
Fraud upon the court violates the Supremacy Clause
of the U.S. Constitution because it violates the Fifth
Amendment’s Due Process Clause. The petitioner further
holds that when judges are involved in acts of fraud upon
the court related to a particular issue, and/or similar
issues that are related to a specific litigant or specific
groups of litigants, especially in relation to issues
regarding the commission of federal law, those acts
32
ui ez nsc u z a m
constitute violation of 18 USC § 1961-1968, RICO laws,
especially as they pertain to the second circuit’s
enforcement of Chevron v. Donziger.
On August 8, 2016, the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court rendered
in the case Chevron v. Donziger, et al (See 974 F.Supp.2d
362 (2014)).
The district court found that defendants Steven
Donziger and his law firm engaged in RICO-predicate acts
under
the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 that resulted in
a corrupt judgment by a Ecuadorian court, and that
because the defendants’ acts led to the Ecuadorian court’s
corrupt decision, the judgment was unenforceable in
federal court under federal law and under New York
common law.
Liberally sprinkled throughout the circuit court’s
decision are the terms “obstruction of justice (pages 96, 97,
98), and “procured by fraud” (pages 70, 109, 111, 112).
The Second Circuit’s decision in Chevron v.
Donziger, et al, in affirming the district court’s decision,
held that the defendants: 1) submitted fraudulent
evidence, 2) told “half-truths…to U.S. courts in attempts
to prevent exposure of other wrongdoing.”
In the petitioner’s case, the district court’s decision
named petitioner’s prior lawsuits: 1) Uzamere v. Allen E.
Kaye, P.C; 2) Uzamere v. Cuomo; 3) Uzamere v. Rice; and
4) Uzamere v. United States.
The district court’s decision stated that:
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action
arising from her 1979 marriage to and
33subsequent abandonment by her husband,
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere… Plaintiff submits to
the Court a 205-page complaint with 540
pages of exhibits.
The petitioner cannot understand how the district
court was honestly able to count the 540 pages of exhibits,
while missing the first exhibit: respondent New York State
Department of Health’s/New York City Clerk’s marriage
affidavit that bore the petitioner/bride’s legal name and
proof of identity but failed to provide petitioner’s
husband/groom’s legal name and accompanying proof of
identity.
The district court also removed 79 of 90 defendants
from the petitioner’s case without explanation, and later
withdrew its own decision granting IFP status after the
petitioner filed her complaint regarding the district court’s
unexplained removal of 79 defendants from her lawsuit
(see Appendix C).
Based on the Second Circuit’s enforcement of RICO
laws regarding court corruption in the case Chevron v.
Donziger, the petitioner believes that she has justiciable
issues regarding the district court’s RICO-predicate acts
based on the district court’s and respondent New York
State’s courts’ acts of obstruction of justice regarding
respondent New York State’s facilitation of her husband’s
and his immigration attorneys’ acts of immigration fraud,
identity fraud, and the removal of the petitioner’s husband
as
financial protector to facilitate the sexual violence
committed against the petitioner’s children while they
were clients of respondent New York State’s foster care
system.
34
ui e 2 n o
:c u z a m
III.
The Petitioner has the First Amendment Right to
advise this Court of Jehovah’s Viewpoint
The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public
Affairs submitted its amicus brief to present Babylonian
Law as humane. However, the amicus brief submitted by
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s in the case Bryan v. Moore was
deceptive.27 The amicus brief cites references that are
unchallengeable to the Babylonian Talmud-ignorant
public who do not know or do not have access to the
Babylonian Talmud. To those who have knowledge of the
Babylonian Talmud, or who like the petitioner, have
downloaded the Babylonian Talmud in its entirety can see
that the cited references were not relevant in Mr. Bryan’s
case. Even worse, COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s capitalizing of Mr.
Bryan’s unfortunate situation was a shameless attempt at
self-aggrandizement and aggrandizement of Babylonian
Talmudic law and Ashkenazi Jewish culture. The brief
itself makes the statement:
COLPA and IAJLJ are vitally interested in
promoting the study of, and respect for,
principles of Jewish Law as they have been
applied throughout the history of the Jewish
people. COLPA and the national groups that
it routinely represents promote and
encourage in-depth study of Talmudic texts.
IAJLJ has sponsored public lectures in
Jewish Law and promoted the publication of
scholarly essays in the field of Jewish Law.
27 “…Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama, Folio 113a
(https://halakhah.com/pdfynezikin/Baba_Kama.pdf): Where a suit arises
between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former
according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: ‘This is our law’; so
also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and
say [to the other party:] ‘This is your law’; but if this cannot be done, we
use subterfuges to circumvent him.
35While COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s attorneys cited, but did
not quote Leviticus 20 regarding the use of fire to punish
men who have sexual relations with their mothers-in law
along with their wives, they failed to mention what
Jehovah’s word says in the verses above regarding
Jehovah’s condemnation of the worship of Molech:
Leviticus 20:14: And if a man [take] with his
wife also her mother, it is wickedness: they
shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that
there be no wickedness among you.
Leviticus 20:1-5:And Jehovah spoke unto
Moses, saying: Moreover, thou shalt say to
the children of Israel: Whosoever he be of the
children of Israel, or of the strangers that
sojourn in Israel, that giveth of his seed unto
Molech; he shall surely be put to death; the
people of the land shall stone him with stones.
I also will set My face against that man, and
will cut him off from among his people,
because he hath given of his seed unto
Molech, to defile My sanctuary, and to profane
My holy name.
And if the people of the land do at all hide
their eyes from that man, when he giveth of
his seed unto Molech, and put him not to
death…
Another glaring omission that attorneys for
COLPA’s and IAJLJ’s made regarding the Babylonian
Talmud’s pretense at humanity is stated earlier in this
petition in Tractate Sanhedrin 64a:
36
uiEznsc u 2 a m
MISHNAH: He who gives of his seed to
Molech incurs no punishment unless he
delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass
through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the
reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does
both.
Jehovah’s word the Bible has long identified the
nation of Israel as worshippers of Molech. Ancient history
identifies Molech as the god of pedophilia and child
sacrifice.
Jehovah’s Prophet Amos, as well as the Apostle
Stephen says the following regarding Israel’s worship of
Molech:
Amos 5:23: “Did ye bring unto Me sacrifices
and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O
house of Israel? So shall ye take up Siccuth
your king and Chiun your images, the star of
your god, which ye made to yourselves.
Therefore, will I cause you to go into captivity
beyond Damascus, saith He, whose name is
Jehovah God of hosts.”
Acts 7:42-43: “…just as it is written in the
book of the Prophets: ‘It was not to me that
you made offerings and sacrifices for 40 years
in the wilderness, was it, O house of
Israel? But it was the tent of Mo loch and the
star of the god Re phan that you took up, the
images that you made to worship them. So, I
will deport you beyond Babylon.”
In 2012, the University of Ben Gurion in the Negev
submitted a report to the U.S. National Institutes of
Health entitled History of Abuse and Organic Difficulties
37in a Convenience Sample of 46 Ultra – orthodox Males with
Pedophilia based on the Ashkenazi Jewish community’s
problem with pedophilia as a public health concern. It
says:
Results: … 82.6% of participants were victims
of sexual trauma as children and 87% suffer
from some kind of organic vulnerability
(learning disabilities, disinhibitions, etc.).
Limitations: Limitations of this small
convenience sample that influence ability to
generalize are discussed.
Conclusions: The current survey indicates
that in this sample, the ultra-orthodox male
pedophile was frequently a victim of
childhood sexual trauma and exhibited
indications of organic vulnerabilities. This is
more pronounced than findings in previous
studies and calls for further research in order
to understand the underlying causes.
Sexual abuse in the ultra-orthodox
community is a serious and under-researched
phenomenon. …
Lastly, the petitioner makes the following
observations as a respectful reminder that there is a Power
that transcends the power of this Court, and that the
petitioner is obedient to that Power. That Power is
Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus
Christ.
In the Bible there are examples that show Jehovah’s
condemnation of gang rape, group sexual depravity and
child sacrifice. Genesis 19:1-23 (Sodom and Gomorrah);
Numbers 25 (Israel’s being lured into worship of Baal-Peor
38
ui e z n dcuzam
to engage in group sex); Judges 19-21 (gang rape and
murder of a Levite’s concubine. These acts are consistent
with individuals who are worshippers of Molech, practices
that the Babylonian Talmud allows, but Jehovah Himself
and the U.S. Constitution forbid.
Jehovah’s told the Prophet Moses to warn Israel,
and by extension, the rest of the world about His hatred
for Molech worshippers in Leviticus 20:1: Any man of
Israel and any foreigner …who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail.
CONCLUSION
The Petition for a writ of certiorari should be
granted.
Respectfully submitted,
CHERYL D. UZAMERJE
Sole Proprietor 1/
Uzamere Word Processing More
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (929) 225-8837
Fax: (929) 225-8827
chexyl.uzamere_@juzamerewordpr
QC.essing.net
39